Yingying Jia , Nianqi Cui , Tingting Jia , Hammza Jabbar Abdl Sattar Hamoudi , Jianping Song
{"title":"Measurement properties of assessment tools of Kinesophobia in patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review","authors":"Yingying Jia , Nianqi Cui , Tingting Jia , Hammza Jabbar Abdl Sattar Hamoudi , Jianping Song","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the measurement properties and methodological quality of assessment tools for Kinesophobia among patients with cardiovascular disease and provide a reference for healthcare professionals in selecting high-quality assessment tools.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search was performed on specific databases: Embase, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, China Biological Medicine disc, CINAHL, and China Science and Technology Journal Database, from inception to April 1, 2023. The researchers retrieved studies on the measurement attributes of the exercise fear scale in patients with cardiovascular diseases. They also traced back the references of the included studies to supplement relevant literature. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, screening and data extraction were independently undertaken by two reviewers. Two researchers individually used the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias Checklist to assess the methodological quality of the scale, applied the COSMIN criteria to evaluate the measurement properties of the scale, and used a modified Grading, Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system to assess the certainty of evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventeen studies were identified that reported the psychometric properties of six patient reported outcome measurement tools (included different languages version) The methodological quality of content validity was adequate in only two studies, the remaining patient-reported outcome measures demonstrated doubtful content validity. Limited information on cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance, measurement error, and responsiveness was retrieved. The Swedish version and the Chinese version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia Heart were graded “A.” The remaining instruments were graded “B.”</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The methodological and measurement attributes of the Swedish and Chinese versions of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia Heart are relatively high quality and can be tentatively recommended. The measurement properties of the remaining scales remain to be verified.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001588/pdfft?md5=204c0e80ecca38ae58f518d9a94b6e69&pid=1-s2.0-S2352013223001588-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the measurement properties and methodological quality of assessment tools for Kinesophobia among patients with cardiovascular disease and provide a reference for healthcare professionals in selecting high-quality assessment tools.
Methods
A systematic search was performed on specific databases: Embase, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, China Biological Medicine disc, CINAHL, and China Science and Technology Journal Database, from inception to April 1, 2023. The researchers retrieved studies on the measurement attributes of the exercise fear scale in patients with cardiovascular diseases. They also traced back the references of the included studies to supplement relevant literature. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, screening and data extraction were independently undertaken by two reviewers. Two researchers individually used the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias Checklist to assess the methodological quality of the scale, applied the COSMIN criteria to evaluate the measurement properties of the scale, and used a modified Grading, Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system to assess the certainty of evidence.
Results
Seventeen studies were identified that reported the psychometric properties of six patient reported outcome measurement tools (included different languages version) The methodological quality of content validity was adequate in only two studies, the remaining patient-reported outcome measures demonstrated doubtful content validity. Limited information on cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance, measurement error, and responsiveness was retrieved. The Swedish version and the Chinese version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia Heart were graded “A.” The remaining instruments were graded “B.”
Conclusions
The methodological and measurement attributes of the Swedish and Chinese versions of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia Heart are relatively high quality and can be tentatively recommended. The measurement properties of the remaining scales remain to be verified.
目的 本研究旨在评估心血管疾病患者运动恐怖症评估工具的测量属性和方法学质量，为医护人员选择高质量的评估工具提供参考。方法 在特定数据库中进行了系统检索：Embase、Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Web of Science、中国国家知识基础设施、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、CINAHL和中国科技期刊数据库。研究人员检索了有关心血管疾病患者运动恐惧量表测量属性的研究。研究人员还追溯了纳入研究的参考文献，以补充相关文献。根据纳入和排除标准，由两名审稿人独立进行筛选和数据提取。两位研究人员分别使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准（COSMIN）偏倚风险检查表评估量表的方法学质量，应用COSMIN标准评估量表的测量属性，并使用修改后的分级、推荐、评估、开发和评价系统评估证据的确定性。结果发现有 17 项研究报告了六种患者报告结果测量工具（包括不同的语言版本）的心理测量特性，其中只有两项研究的内容效度方法学质量足够高，其余患者报告结果测量工具的内容效度值得怀疑。有关跨文化有效性/测量不变性、测量误差和响应性的信息有限。坦帕运动恐惧心理量表的瑞典语版本和中文版本被评为 "A "级。结论 瑞典版和中文版《坦帕运动恐惧心理量表》的方法和测量属性相对较高，可以初步推荐使用。其余量表的测量属性还有待验证。
期刊介绍：
This journal aims to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, providing an international platform for exchanging knowledge, research findings and nursing practice experience. This journal covers a wide range of nursing topics such as advanced nursing practice, bio-psychosocial issues related to health, cultural perspectives, lifestyle change as a component of health promotion, chronic disease, including end-of-life care, family care giving. IJNSS publishes four issues per year in Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. IJNSS intended readership includes practicing nurses in all spheres and at all levels who are committed to advancing practice and professional development on the basis of new knowledge and evidence; managers and senior members of the nursing; nurse educators and nursing students etc. IJNSS seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Contributions are welcomed from other health professions on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
