Where do opportunity beliefs come from? Implications of intergenerational social mobility for beliefs about the distribution system in China

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Research in Social Stratification and Mobility Pub Date : 2024-01-06 DOI:10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100888
Peng Wang , Francisco Olivos
{"title":"Where do opportunity beliefs come from? Implications of intergenerational social mobility for beliefs about the distribution system in China","authors":"Peng Wang ,&nbsp;Francisco Olivos","doi":"10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>People’s understanding of the drivers of inequality is a function of their position in the social structure. Nevertheless, the ways in which intergenerational social mobility is associated with opportunity beliefs remain under researched. Recent findings in cultural sociology suggest that individuals seldom update their beliefs, and that settled dispositions lead people to reproduce their beliefs in their adulthood. This study used a probabilistic and representative survey of Chinese citizens to explore how intergenerational social mobility relates to opportunity beliefs. China presents an interesting context to explore this question, since Chinese society is considered to be highly unequal yet highly tolerant of social inequalities. Our results indicate a U-shaped relationship between social class and opportunity beliefs. The upper class and farmers exhibit stronger meritocratic beliefs than middle-classes. Moreover, upwardly and downwardly mobile individuals show greater weights for origin and destination, respectively. Thus, opportunity beliefs are explained by the social class where they rank lower. These findings suggest that when beliefs are updated through social mobility, they interact with the mobility trajectory. In addition, the stronger meritocratic beliefs of the farmers’ class and the greater weight of social origin for upwardly mobile individuals could help explain the dormant social volcano in China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47384,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 100888"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562424000015/pdfft?md5=0c1c6242008e0bc74dd535a910ea0d8a&pid=1-s2.0-S0276562424000015-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562424000015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People’s understanding of the drivers of inequality is a function of their position in the social structure. Nevertheless, the ways in which intergenerational social mobility is associated with opportunity beliefs remain under researched. Recent findings in cultural sociology suggest that individuals seldom update their beliefs, and that settled dispositions lead people to reproduce their beliefs in their adulthood. This study used a probabilistic and representative survey of Chinese citizens to explore how intergenerational social mobility relates to opportunity beliefs. China presents an interesting context to explore this question, since Chinese society is considered to be highly unequal yet highly tolerant of social inequalities. Our results indicate a U-shaped relationship between social class and opportunity beliefs. The upper class and farmers exhibit stronger meritocratic beliefs than middle-classes. Moreover, upwardly and downwardly mobile individuals show greater weights for origin and destination, respectively. Thus, opportunity beliefs are explained by the social class where they rank lower. These findings suggest that when beliefs are updated through social mobility, they interact with the mobility trajectory. In addition, the stronger meritocratic beliefs of the farmers’ class and the greater weight of social origin for upwardly mobile individuals could help explain the dormant social volcano in China.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机会信念从何而来?代际社会流动对中国分配制度信念的影响
人们对不平等驱动因素的理解取决于他们在社会结构中的地位。然而,人们对代际社会流动与机会信念之间的关系仍缺乏研究。文化社会学的最新研究结果表明,个人很少更新自己的信念,而固定的倾向性会导致人们在成年后复制自己的信念。本研究通过对中国公民进行概率性和代表性调查,探讨代际社会流动与机会信念之间的关系。由于中国社会被认为是一个高度不平等但又高度容忍社会不平等的社会,因此中国为探讨这一问题提供了一个有趣的背景。我们的研究结果表明,社会阶层与机会信念之间呈 U 型关系。与中产阶级相比,上层阶级和农民表现出更强烈的择优信念。此外,向上流动和向下流动的个人分别对原籍地和目的地表现出更大的权重。因此,机会信念是由其排名较低的社会阶层来解释的。这些发现表明,当信念通过社会流动而更新时,它们会与流动轨迹相互作用。此外,农民阶层更强的功利主义信念和上向流动个体更大的社会出身权重也有助于解释中国沉睡的社会火山。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility is dedicated to publishing the highest, most innovative research on issues of social inequality from a broad diversity of theoretical and methodological perspectives. The journal is also dedicated to cutting edge summaries of prior research and fruitful exchanges that will stimulate future research on issues of social inequality. The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists.
期刊最新文献
His and hers earnings trajectories: Economic homogamy and long-term earnings inequality within and between different-sex couples The distribution of privately held business assets in the United States The U-turn in educational inequality. Why a multidimensional approach matters for measuring social inequalities in tertiary educational attainment Intergenerational poverty persistence in Europe – Is there a ‘Great Gatsby Curve’ for poverty? Beauty pays, but not under all circumstances: Evidence on gendered hiring discrimination from a novel experimental treatment using deepfakes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1