Abordajes mínimamente invasivos para meningiomas de la base craneal

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Neurocirugia Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neucir.2023.11.002
Carlos Roberto Vargas Gálvez, Omar López Arbolay, Marlon Manuel Ortiz Machín
{"title":"Abordajes mínimamente invasivos para meningiomas de la base craneal","authors":"Carlos Roberto Vargas Gálvez,&nbsp;Omar López Arbolay,&nbsp;Marlon Manuel Ortiz Machín","doi":"10.1016/j.neucir.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Skull base meningiomas constitute a complex group of skull base tumors. The endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) and endoscopic Keyhole have a minimally invasive philosophy with high effectiveness, safety, and a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity in these tumors.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the results of the use of minimally invasive approaches to skull base meningiomas.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out in 140 patients at the Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital who underwent surgery for cranial base meningiomas using minimally invasive approaches to the cranial base. The degree of tumor resection, tumor recurrence, reinterventions, and complications were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>EEA were used in 72.8% of the study, while endoscopic Keyholes were used in 26.4% and combined approaches in 0.7%. In relation to total tumor resection, 91.9% was generally achieved. Overall tumor recurrence and reinterventions were less than 8.5% and 4%, respectively. Complications in EEA were: cerebrospinal fluid fistula (2.1%), diabetes insipidus, hydrocephalus, cerebral infarction, surgical site hematoma, worsening of cranial nerves <span>i-iv</span> (1.4%) respectively. While in the Keyhole type approaches: seizures (2.9%), hydrocephalus (1.4%), cerebrospinal fluid fistula (1.4%), worsening of nerves <span>ix-xii</span> (0.7%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The following study reaffirms that minimally invasive approaches for skull base meningiomas constitute advanced surgical techniques for these tumors, associated with a low rate of postoperative complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51145,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 127-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130147323003937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Skull base meningiomas constitute a complex group of skull base tumors. The endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) and endoscopic Keyhole have a minimally invasive philosophy with high effectiveness, safety, and a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity in these tumors.

Objective

To describe the results of the use of minimally invasive approaches to skull base meningiomas.

Method

A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out in 140 patients at the Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital who underwent surgery for cranial base meningiomas using minimally invasive approaches to the cranial base. The degree of tumor resection, tumor recurrence, reinterventions, and complications were evaluated.

Results

EEA were used in 72.8% of the study, while endoscopic Keyholes were used in 26.4% and combined approaches in 0.7%. In relation to total tumor resection, 91.9% was generally achieved. Overall tumor recurrence and reinterventions were less than 8.5% and 4%, respectively. Complications in EEA were: cerebrospinal fluid fistula (2.1%), diabetes insipidus, hydrocephalus, cerebral infarction, surgical site hematoma, worsening of cranial nerves i-iv (1.4%) respectively. While in the Keyhole type approaches: seizures (2.9%), hydrocephalus (1.4%), cerebrospinal fluid fistula (1.4%), worsening of nerves ix-xii (0.7%).

Conclusions

The following study reaffirms that minimally invasive approaches for skull base meningiomas constitute advanced surgical techniques for these tumors, associated with a low rate of postoperative complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅底脑膜瘤的微创治疗方法
导言颅底脑膜瘤是一类复杂的颅底肿瘤。方法 对 Hermanos Ameijeiras 医院的 140 名颅底脑膜瘤患者进行了描述性、回顾性研究,这些患者均接受了颅底微创手术。研究对肿瘤切除程度、肿瘤复发、再次干预和并发症进行了评估。结果72.8%的研究采用了EEA,26.4%采用了内窥镜锁孔,0.7%采用了联合方法。肿瘤总切除率一般为 91.9%。肿瘤总复发率和再次手术率分别低于8.5%和4%。EEA的并发症分别为:脑脊液瘘(2.1%)、糖尿病性尿崩症、脑积水、脑梗塞、手术部位血肿、颅神经i-iv恶化(1.4%)。结论以下研究再次证实,颅底脑膜瘤微创手术是治疗此类肿瘤的先进手术技术,术后并发症发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocirugia
Neurocirugia 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurocirugía is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (SENEC). It is published every 2 months (6 issues per year). Neurocirugía will consider for publication, original clinical and experimental scientific works associated with neurosurgery and other related neurological sciences. All manuscripts are submitted for review by experts in the field (peer review) and are carried out anonymously (double blind). The Journal accepts works written in Spanish or English.
期刊最新文献
Integrating endovascular techniques into established open neurosurgery practice: a temporal analysis of treatment evolution in a dual-trained neurosurgical unit Aneurismas intracraneales no rotos tratados con microcirugía: análisis de resultados clínicos y radiológicos Effective method of pedicle screw fixation in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of studies published over the last 20 years Epidemiological aspects of syringomyelia in a 19-year old cohort of spinal cord injury patients Chiari malformation presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1