The Incidence and Outcomes Following Treatment of Capsulolabral Adhesions in Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review.

The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2023-12-01
Taylor J Den Hartog, Steven M Leary, Andrew L Schaver, Emily A Parker, Robert W Westermann
{"title":"The Incidence and Outcomes Following Treatment of Capsulolabral Adhesions in Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Taylor J Den Hartog, Steven M Leary, Andrew L Schaver, Emily A Parker, Robert W Westermann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To perform a systematic review to evaluate the incidence of capsulolabral adhesions following hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI); including risk factors and post-treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we queried PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for English-language studies with minimum 6-month follow-up after primary or revision HA for FAI, which reported the incidence of capsulolabral adhesions. Potential adhesion risk factors, such as anchor type used and protocol for capsule closure, were assessed. Pre-operative and post-operative modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) values were compared in studies that reported them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven articles were included (24 primary HA; 13 revision HA). There were 6747 patients who underwent primary HA (6874 hips; 3005 female, 44%). The incidence of capsulolabral adhesions, confirmed surgically during revision HA, was low. Patients undergoing surgical treatment reported postoperative improvement per modified Harris Hip Scores. Data for 746 patients undergoing second revision HA (761 hips; 449 female, 60%), showed an incidence of adhesions greater than that of primary HA patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the incidence of symptomatic capsulolabral adhesions after primary hip arthroscopy is low; revision hip arthroscopy is strongly associated with adhesion development. Lysis of adhesions in primary hip arthroscopy patients reliably improved patient-reported outcomes. <b>Level of Evidence: IV</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94233,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":"43 2","pages":"146-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10777703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To perform a systematic review to evaluate the incidence of capsulolabral adhesions following hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI); including risk factors and post-treatment outcomes.

Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we queried PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for English-language studies with minimum 6-month follow-up after primary or revision HA for FAI, which reported the incidence of capsulolabral adhesions. Potential adhesion risk factors, such as anchor type used and protocol for capsule closure, were assessed. Pre-operative and post-operative modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) values were compared in studies that reported them.

Results: Thirty-seven articles were included (24 primary HA; 13 revision HA). There were 6747 patients who underwent primary HA (6874 hips; 3005 female, 44%). The incidence of capsulolabral adhesions, confirmed surgically during revision HA, was low. Patients undergoing surgical treatment reported postoperative improvement per modified Harris Hip Scores. Data for 746 patients undergoing second revision HA (761 hips; 449 female, 60%), showed an incidence of adhesions greater than that of primary HA patients.

Conclusion: While the incidence of symptomatic capsulolabral adhesions after primary hip arthroscopy is low; revision hip arthroscopy is strongly associated with adhesion development. Lysis of adhesions in primary hip arthroscopy patients reliably improved patient-reported outcomes. Level of Evidence: IV.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋关节镜下治疗髋臼囊粘连的发生率和疗效:系统回顾
背景:进行一项系统性综述,评估髋关节镜(HA)治疗股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)后髋关节囊唇粘连的发生率,包括风险因素和治疗后的结果:根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,我们在PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中央注册中心检索了FAI初次或翻修HA术后至少随访6个月的英文研究,这些研究报告了关节囊粘连的发生率。评估了潜在的粘连风险因素,如使用的锚类型和关节囊闭合方案。对报告了术前和术后改良哈里斯髋关节评分(mHHS)值的研究进行了比较:结果:共纳入 37 篇文章(24 篇初次髋关节置换术;13 篇翻修髋关节置换术)。6747名患者接受了初次髋关节置换术(6874个髋关节;3005名女性,占44%)。在翻修HA手术中,经手术确认的髋臼囊粘连发生率很低。根据改良哈里斯髋关节评分(Harris Hip Scores),接受手术治疗的患者术后病情均有改善。746名接受第二次翻修髋关节置换术的患者(761个髋关节;449名女性,60%)的数据显示,粘连发生率高于初次髋关节置换术患者:结论:虽然初次髋关节镜手术后症状性关节囊粘连的发生率较低,但翻修髋关节镜手术与粘连的发生密切相关。对初次髋关节镜手术患者进行粘连溶解能可靠地改善患者报告的结果。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pain Management for Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Systematic Review. Peri-Operative Management of Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Report of Current Practices from the Anchor Group, Supporting Literature, and Areas for Future Investigation. Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Very Young Children - A Case Report and Modern Review. Predicting Septic Arthritis in the Setting of Crystalline Arthropathy in the Native Joint Using Laboratory Data. Predictive Factors for Intraoperative Determination for the Need of Femoral Osteochondroplasty After Periacetabular Osteotomy for Acetabular Dysplasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1