Removing Trade Barriers Between China and India: A Counterfactual Analysis on Export Growth and Welfare

IF 1.1 Q4 BUSINESS Foreign Trade Review Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1177/00157325231215548
U. Kathjoo, A. Fazili
{"title":"Removing Trade Barriers Between China and India: A Counterfactual Analysis on Export Growth and Welfare","authors":"U. Kathjoo, A. Fazili","doi":"10.1177/00157325231215548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The two Asian giants, China and India, share a long history of political acrimony and simmering border disputes. This often disrupts their bilateral economic relationship along with the overall dynamics of the regional balance of power and the global multi-polarisation order. Under such a scenario, this study aims to measure the impact of a hypothetical removal of all trade barriers between China and India on the overall exports and welfare of 73 sample countries while preserving the geographical trade costs. Employing the structural gravity model under a general equilibrium setting, the counterfactual scenario reveals that India, followed by China, is the main beneficiary of full-scale integration in terms of trade growth and welfare. Indian consumers gain while producers tend to lose through a decrease in prices. Chinese welfare gains are shared among its producers and consumers with light asymmetry. Next, we simulate a unilateral removal of all trade barriers while preserving the effects of geography for exports from China to India. The results reveal that asymmetric trade liberalisation leads to smaller gains for both countries at the expense of certain groups and the aggregate national welfare. JEL Codes: D58, F02, F17, O57","PeriodicalId":29933,"journal":{"name":"Foreign Trade Review","volume":"23 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foreign Trade Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00157325231215548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The two Asian giants, China and India, share a long history of political acrimony and simmering border disputes. This often disrupts their bilateral economic relationship along with the overall dynamics of the regional balance of power and the global multi-polarisation order. Under such a scenario, this study aims to measure the impact of a hypothetical removal of all trade barriers between China and India on the overall exports and welfare of 73 sample countries while preserving the geographical trade costs. Employing the structural gravity model under a general equilibrium setting, the counterfactual scenario reveals that India, followed by China, is the main beneficiary of full-scale integration in terms of trade growth and welfare. Indian consumers gain while producers tend to lose through a decrease in prices. Chinese welfare gains are shared among its producers and consumers with light asymmetry. Next, we simulate a unilateral removal of all trade barriers while preserving the effects of geography for exports from China to India. The results reveal that asymmetric trade liberalisation leads to smaller gains for both countries at the expense of certain groups and the aggregate national welfare. JEL Codes: D58, F02, F17, O57
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消除中印之间的贸易壁垒:对出口增长和福利的反事实分析
中国和印度这两个亚洲巨人有着长期的政治矛盾和一触即发的边界争端。这往往会破坏两国的双边经济关系,同时也会影响地区力量平衡和全球多极化秩序的整体动态。在这种情况下,本研究旨在衡量假设中印之间取消所有贸易壁垒对 73 个样本国家总体出口和福利的影响,同时保留地域贸易成本。在一般均衡背景下运用结构引力模型,反事实情景显示,就贸易增长和福利而言,印度是全面一体化的主要受益者,其次是中国。印度消费者受益,而生产者往往会因价格下降而蒙受损失。中国的福利收益由生产者和消费者共享,但存在轻度不对称。接下来,我们模拟了单边取消所有贸易壁垒的情况,同时保留地理因素对中国向印度出口的影响。结果显示,非对称贸易自由化导致两国的收益都较小,但牺牲了某些群体和国家的总体福利。JEL Codes:D58, F02, F17, O57
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Trading in Turbulent Times: Unravelling the Interplay between Trade Policy Uncertainty and Geopolitics in Russian Mineral Resource Supply Search Friction and Costly Entry in the Specific Factors Model Trade Gap and Public Debt Sustainability in Nigeria Imported Inputs and Export Performance: A Gravity Analysis Book review: Rajib Bhattacharyya, Ramesh Chandra Das, and Achintya Ray (Eds.), COVID-19 Pandemic and Global Inequality: Reflections in Labour Market, Business and Social Sectors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1