Global supply chains as global commons: some policy considerations from the perspective of microfoundations in an evolutionary framework

Henning Schwardt
{"title":"Global supply chains as global commons: some policy considerations from the perspective of microfoundations in an evolutionary framework","authors":"Henning Schwardt","doi":"10.1007/s40844-023-00273-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Microfoundations have served as a foundation to inform different research interests in evolutionary economics. We will consider aspects of global supply chains. The focus for us will be, in particular, the (lack of) resilience of those structures and what measures might be promising to enhance their resilience. The framing we propose to outline the problem structure rests on (evolutionary) game theory and combines this with an understanding of the embedding system that relies on original institutional economics. This allows to illustrate potential issues that a methodological individualism cannot capture and can inform policy possibilities that go beyond some version of ‘making markets work better’. Specifically, we offer a perspective of global supply as a commons-like problem structure. From this perspective, in a decentralized decision-making structure, focusing on changes to individual incentives only, to increase the resilience of supply chains is not fundamentally achievable, but will have to be supported in further ways by policymakers and administrative units.</p>","PeriodicalId":44114,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-023-00273-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microfoundations have served as a foundation to inform different research interests in evolutionary economics. We will consider aspects of global supply chains. The focus for us will be, in particular, the (lack of) resilience of those structures and what measures might be promising to enhance their resilience. The framing we propose to outline the problem structure rests on (evolutionary) game theory and combines this with an understanding of the embedding system that relies on original institutional economics. This allows to illustrate potential issues that a methodological individualism cannot capture and can inform policy possibilities that go beyond some version of ‘making markets work better’. Specifically, we offer a perspective of global supply as a commons-like problem structure. From this perspective, in a decentralized decision-making structure, focusing on changes to individual incentives only, to increase the resilience of supply chains is not fundamentally achievable, but will have to be supported in further ways by policymakers and administrative units.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为全球公域的全球供应链:从演化框架中的微观基础角度出发的一些政策考量
微观基础是进化经济学不同研究兴趣的基础。我们将考虑全球供应链的各个方面。我们将特别关注这些结构(缺乏)复原力的问题,以及哪些措施有可能增强其复原力。我们提出的概括问题结构的框架以(进化)博弈论为基础,并将其与依靠原始制度经济学对嵌入系统的理解相结合。这有助于说明方法论上的个人主义无法捕捉的潜在问题,并为政策的可能性提供信息,而不仅仅是某种版本的 "让市场更好地运作"。具体来说,我们将全球供应视为一个类似于公共问题结构的视角。从这个角度来看,在分散的决策结构中,仅仅关注个人激励机制的改变,并不能从根本上提高供应链的抗风险能力,还需要政策制定者和行政单位进一步的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review (EIER) is issued by the Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics to provide an international forum for new theoretical and empirical approaches to evolutionary and institutional economics. EIER, free from the view of equilibrium economics and methodological individualism, should face the diversity of human behavior and dynamic transformation of institutions. In EIER, “economics” is used in its broadest sense. It covers areas from the classic research in economic history, economic thought, economic theory, and management science to emerging research fields such as economic sociology, bio-economics, evolutionary game theory, agent-based modeling, complex systems study, econo-physics, experimental economics, and so on. EIER follows the belief that a truly interdisciplinary discussion is needed to propel the investigation in the dynamic process of socio-economic change where institutions as emergent outcomes of human actions do matter. Although EIER is an official journal of the Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics, it welcomes non-members'' contributions from all parts of the world. All the contributions are refereed under strict scientific criteria, although EIER does not apply monolithic formalistic measure to them. Evolution goes hand in hand with diversities; this is also the spirit of EIER. Focus areas of the Review (not exhaustive): - Foundations of institutional and evolutionary economics - Criticism of mainstream views in the social sciences - Knowledge and learning in socio-economic life - Development and innovation of technologies - Transformation of industrial organizations and economic systems - Experimental studies in economics - Agent-based modeling of socio-economic systems - Evolution of the governance structure of firms and other organizations - Comparison of dynamically changing institutions of the world - Policy proposals in the transformational process of economic life
期刊最新文献
Stability of price and quantity to a long-run equilibrium: a dynamic Leontief model with bounded rationality Mixtures of log-normal distributions in the mid-scale range of firm-size variables Downward aggregate supply curve in inflation crisis Why is the Cobb-Douglas production function so popular? Okun’s law and anelastic relaxation in advanced and developing economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1