Achievement and Growth on English Language Proficiency and Content Assessments for English Learners in Elementary Grades

IF 2.7 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1111/emip.12588
Heather M Buzick, Mikyung Kim Wolf, Laura Ballard
{"title":"Achievement and Growth on English Language Proficiency and Content Assessments for English Learners in Elementary Grades","authors":"Heather M Buzick,&nbsp;Mikyung Kim Wolf,&nbsp;Laura Ballard","doi":"10.1111/emip.12588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>English language proficiency (ELP) assessment scores are used by states to make high-stakes decisions related to linguistic support in instruction and assessment for English learner (EL) students and for EL student reclassification. Changes to both academic content standards and ELP academic standards within the last decade have resulted in increased academic rigor and language demands. In this study, we explored the association between EL student performance over time on content (English language arts and mathematics) and ELP assessments, generally finding evidence of positive associations. Modeling the simultaneous association between changes over time in both content and ELP assessment performance contributes empirical evidence about the role of language in ELA and mathematics development and provides contextual information to serve as validity evidence for score inferences for EL students.</p>","PeriodicalId":47345,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12588","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

English language proficiency (ELP) assessment scores are used by states to make high-stakes decisions related to linguistic support in instruction and assessment for English learner (EL) students and for EL student reclassification. Changes to both academic content standards and ELP academic standards within the last decade have resulted in increased academic rigor and language demands. In this study, we explored the association between EL student performance over time on content (English language arts and mathematics) and ELP assessments, generally finding evidence of positive associations. Modeling the simultaneous association between changes over time in both content and ELP assessment performance contributes empirical evidence about the role of language in ELA and mathematics development and provides contextual information to serve as validity evidence for score inferences for EL students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小学英语学习者在英语语言能力和内容评估中的成绩和成长
各州使用英语语言能力(ELP)评估分数来做出与英语学习者(EL)学生的教学和评估中的语言支持有关的高风险决策,以及对英语学习者学生进行重新分类。在过去十年中,学术内容标准和英语学习能力学术标准的变化导致了学术严谨性和语言要求的提高。在这项研究中,我们探讨了随着时间的推移,英语语言学习者(EL)学生在学习内容(英语语言艺术和数学)和英语语言学习能力(ELP)评估中的表现之间的关联,总体上发现了正相关的证据。建立内容和英语学习能力评估成绩随时间变化的同步关联模型,为语言在英语语言艺术和数学发展中的作用提供了经验证据,并为英语学习者的分数推断提供了背景信息作为有效性证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
The Past, Present, and Future of Large‐Scale Assessment Consortia Commentary: Where Does Classroom Assessment Fit in Educational Measurement? Commentary: A Data‐Driven Analysis of Recent Job Posts to Evaluate the Foundational Competencies Commentary: Past, Present, and Future of Educational Measurement Commentary: How Research and Testing Companies can Support Early‐Career Measurement Professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1