Expert opinion survey on Israel's food system: implications for food and health policies.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Israel Journal of Health Policy Research Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1186/s13584-024-00590-3
Emily Soh, Elliot M Berry, Eran Feitelson
{"title":"Expert opinion survey on Israel's food system: implications for food and health policies.","authors":"Emily Soh, Elliot M Berry, Eran Feitelson","doi":"10.1186/s13584-024-00590-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While there has been increasing global recognition and impetus for action to transform food systems towards greater food security, sustainability and better health outcomes, Israel has only recently begun to focus on the diverse challenges of its food system and its potential for transformation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An expert opinion survey (n = 50) on Israel's food system was conducted as part of a larger study on the systemic features of Israel's food system transition to understand its policy gaps and find strategies towards a healthy and sustainable food system. The survey ranks the relevance and importance of food system challenges and policy preferences. Policy implications are then examined by identifying potential priorities, gaps and dissensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey finds that there is a majority agreement (76%) that Israel's food policies are lacking or severely lacking. Respondents relate strongly to both concepts of nutritional security (90% think that access to nutritious food is relevant or highly relevant) and national food security (more than 80% perceive food security as part of national security). Respondents overwhelmingly recognize the benefits of Israeli agriculture with 60-90% agreeing or strongly agreeing that it benefits food security, economic value and national identity. Top-ranked problems include overall systemic problems such as the lack of national goals, strategic planning, and integrated policymaking across ministries, and specific ones such as food waste, costly farming inputs, and food affordability. The most preferred policy actions include establishing a national strategy for food and agriculture, making food affordable for vulnerable households, and incentivising sustainable farming methods. The key policy gaps include the lack of resilience in agriculture and the food system, insufficient data and knowledge for policy action, inadequate attention to the regulation of the food industry for better health and inadequate food policy attention for minority groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Building on this study's findings, further policy research and implementation areas to be covered include government responsibility for universal food security, strategic systemic policies for food systems, prevention and preparedness for future crises, and promoting resilience. The way forward may best be through an inter-ministerial committee with the responsibility, budgets, mandate and executive authority to plan data-driven policies for a sustainable food system for Israel's future.</p>","PeriodicalId":46694,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10789065/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-024-00590-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While there has been increasing global recognition and impetus for action to transform food systems towards greater food security, sustainability and better health outcomes, Israel has only recently begun to focus on the diverse challenges of its food system and its potential for transformation.

Methods: An expert opinion survey (n = 50) on Israel's food system was conducted as part of a larger study on the systemic features of Israel's food system transition to understand its policy gaps and find strategies towards a healthy and sustainable food system. The survey ranks the relevance and importance of food system challenges and policy preferences. Policy implications are then examined by identifying potential priorities, gaps and dissensus.

Results: The survey finds that there is a majority agreement (76%) that Israel's food policies are lacking or severely lacking. Respondents relate strongly to both concepts of nutritional security (90% think that access to nutritious food is relevant or highly relevant) and national food security (more than 80% perceive food security as part of national security). Respondents overwhelmingly recognize the benefits of Israeli agriculture with 60-90% agreeing or strongly agreeing that it benefits food security, economic value and national identity. Top-ranked problems include overall systemic problems such as the lack of national goals, strategic planning, and integrated policymaking across ministries, and specific ones such as food waste, costly farming inputs, and food affordability. The most preferred policy actions include establishing a national strategy for food and agriculture, making food affordable for vulnerable households, and incentivising sustainable farming methods. The key policy gaps include the lack of resilience in agriculture and the food system, insufficient data and knowledge for policy action, inadequate attention to the regulation of the food industry for better health and inadequate food policy attention for minority groups.

Conclusions: Building on this study's findings, further policy research and implementation areas to be covered include government responsibility for universal food security, strategic systemic policies for food systems, prevention and preparedness for future crises, and promoting resilience. The way forward may best be through an inter-ministerial committee with the responsibility, budgets, mandate and executive authority to plan data-driven policies for a sustainable food system for Israel's future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于以色列食品体系的专家意见调查:对食品和健康政策的影响。
背景:虽然全球日益认识到并推动采取行动改造粮食系统,以提高粮食安全、可持续性和健康水平,但以色列最近才开始关注其粮食系统面临的各种挑战及其改造潜力:方法:对以色列粮食系统进行了一次专家意见调查(n = 50),作为以色列粮食系统转型系统特征大型研究的一部分,以了解其政策差距,并找到实现健康和可持续粮食系统的战略。调查对粮食系统挑战和政策偏好的相关性和重要性进行了排名。然后,通过确定潜在的优先事项、差距和分歧,对政策影响进行研究:调查发现,大多数人(76%)认为以色列的粮食政策欠缺或严重欠缺。受访者对营养安全(90% 的受访者认为获得营养食品具有相关性或高度相关性)和国家粮食安全(80% 以上的受访者认为粮食安全是国家安全的一部分)这两个概念有很强的认同感。绝大多数受访者承认以色列农业的好处,60%-90%的受访者同意或非常同意以色列农业有利于粮食安全、经济价值和国家认同。排在前列的问题包括缺乏国家目标、战略规划和跨部委综合决策等整体系统性问题,以及粮食浪费、农业投入成本高昂和粮食价格低廉等具体问题。最可取的政策行动包括制定国家粮食和农业战略、让弱势家庭买得起粮食,以及激励采用可持续耕作方法。主要的政策差距包括:农业和粮食系统缺乏复原力;政策行动的数据和知识不足;没有充分关注为改善健康而对粮食行业进行的监管;没有充分关注少数群体的粮食政策:在本研究结论的基础上,需要进一步开展政策研究和实施的领域包括政府对普遍粮食安全的责任、粮食系统的战略性系统政策、对未来危机的预防和准备,以及提高抗灾能力。前进的最佳途径可能是通过一个部际委员会,该委员会有责任、预算、任务和行政权力,为以色列未来的可持续粮食系统规划以数据为导向的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
38
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Navigating crisis: exploring the links between threat perceptions, well-being, individual and workplace resilience among general hospital staff. Emotional resilience and sense of danger among doctors in hospitals during periods of heightened tensions and warfare in Israel. Israeli dentists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding smoking cessation care. October 7th 2023 mass casualty incident in southern Israel: lessons for emergency preparedness and management. Motivations of Israeli physicians to return, or not, to Israel after their fellowship abroad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1