{"title":"Comparison of the Effect of Using Collective Plus Ag Dressing and Vaseline Gauze Dressing in the Donor of Split-Thickness Burn Grafts.","authors":"Mostafa Dahmardehei, Raheleh Moin Ara, Hossein Akbari Ahmadabadi","doi":"10.61186/wjps.12.3.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skin graft involves removing a part of the skin and using it in another part of the body. One of the most common reasons for using a graft is burns. We aimed to compare the effect of Colactive plus Ag dressing with Vaseline gauze dressing in donor sites of split-thickness skin grafts of burned patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study was conducted as a randomized clinical trial (RCT) in the Motahari burn Hospital, Tehran, Iran in 1401. The sampling method was done using Cochran's formula and available patients so 15 people were enrolled. The findings of the study were collected using a researcher-made form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average duration of recovery, the amount and intensity of pain, and the amount of itching between the two types of Colative plus Ag plus Ag dressing with Vaseline gauze are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. (P-value<0.05). In addition, the findings showed that the average amount of scar left by the wound in the two types of dressings examined is not statistically significant at the 95% confidence level (P-value > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of Colactive silver dressing has less pain, less itching in the donor area, and a shorter average recovery time than Vaseline gauze. The use of the Colactive plus Ag will be more effective than Vaseline gauze.</p>","PeriodicalId":23736,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"12 3","pages":"57-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10788102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61186/wjps.12.3.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Skin graft involves removing a part of the skin and using it in another part of the body. One of the most common reasons for using a graft is burns. We aimed to compare the effect of Colactive plus Ag dressing with Vaseline gauze dressing in donor sites of split-thickness skin grafts of burned patients.
Methods: The present study was conducted as a randomized clinical trial (RCT) in the Motahari burn Hospital, Tehran, Iran in 1401. The sampling method was done using Cochran's formula and available patients so 15 people were enrolled. The findings of the study were collected using a researcher-made form.
Results: The average duration of recovery, the amount and intensity of pain, and the amount of itching between the two types of Colative plus Ag plus Ag dressing with Vaseline gauze are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. (P-value<0.05). In addition, the findings showed that the average amount of scar left by the wound in the two types of dressings examined is not statistically significant at the 95% confidence level (P-value > 0.05).
Conclusion: The use of Colactive silver dressing has less pain, less itching in the donor area, and a shorter average recovery time than Vaseline gauze. The use of the Colactive plus Ag will be more effective than Vaseline gauze.
背景:皮肤移植是指切除部分皮肤,然后将其用于身体的另一部分。使用植皮的最常见原因之一是烧伤。我们的目的是比较 Colactive 加 Ag 敷料与凡士林纱布敷料在烧伤患者分层厚皮移植供体部位的效果:本研究是一项随机临床试验(RCT),于 1401 年在伊朗德黑兰的莫塔哈里烧伤医院进行。抽样方法采用科克兰公式和可用患者,因此有 15 人被纳入研究。研究结果通过研究人员自制的表格收集:在 95% 的置信水平下,两种类型的 Colative 加 Ag 加 Ag 敷料与凡士林纱布之间的平均恢复时间、疼痛量和强度以及瘙痒量均有统计学意义(P 值 0.05)。(P值为0.05):与凡士林纱布相比,使用 Colactive 银敷料的供体区疼痛更轻、瘙痒更少,平均恢复时间更短。使用 Colactive plus Ag 比凡士林纱布更有效。