Why We Should Stop Trying to Fix Women: How Context Shapes and Constrains Women's Career Trajectories.

IF 23.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Annual review of psychology Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-032620-030938
Michelle K Ryan, Thekla Morgenroth
{"title":"Why We Should Stop Trying to Fix Women: How Context Shapes and Constrains Women's Career Trajectories.","authors":"Michelle K Ryan, Thekla Morgenroth","doi":"10.1146/annurev-psych-032620-030938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this review we examine two classes of interventions designed to achieve workplace gender equality: (<i>a</i>) those designed to boost motivations and ambition, such as those that aim to attract more women into roles where they are underrepresented; and (<i>b</i>) those that try to provide women with needed abilities to achieve these positions. While such initiatives are generally well meaning, they tend to be based upon (and reinforce) stereotypes of what women lack. Such a deficit model leads to interventions that attempt to \"fix\" women rather than address the structural factors that are the root of gender inequalities. We provide a critical appraisal of the literature to establish an evidence base for why fixing women is unlikely to be successful. As an alternative, we focus on understanding how organizational context and culture maintain these inequalities by looking at how they shape and constrain (<i>a</i>) women's motivations and ambitions, and (<i>b</i>) the expression and interpretation of their skills and attributes. In doing so, we seek to shift the interventional focus from women themselves to the systems and structures in which they are embedded.</p>","PeriodicalId":8010,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":23.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032620-030938","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this review we examine two classes of interventions designed to achieve workplace gender equality: (a) those designed to boost motivations and ambition, such as those that aim to attract more women into roles where they are underrepresented; and (b) those that try to provide women with needed abilities to achieve these positions. While such initiatives are generally well meaning, they tend to be based upon (and reinforce) stereotypes of what women lack. Such a deficit model leads to interventions that attempt to "fix" women rather than address the structural factors that are the root of gender inequalities. We provide a critical appraisal of the literature to establish an evidence base for why fixing women is unlikely to be successful. As an alternative, we focus on understanding how organizational context and culture maintain these inequalities by looking at how they shape and constrain (a) women's motivations and ambitions, and (b) the expression and interpretation of their skills and attributes. In doing so, we seek to shift the interventional focus from women themselves to the systems and structures in which they are embedded.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么我们应该停止试图改造女性:环境如何塑造和限制女性的职业轨迹》(Why We Should Stop Trying to Fix Women: How Context Shapes and Constrains Women's Career Trajectories)。
在这篇综述中,我们研究了两类旨在实现工作场所性别平等的干预措施:(a)旨在提高积极性和进取心的干预措施,例如那些旨在吸引更多女性担任女性比例不足的职位的干预措施;以及(b)那些试图为女性提供担任这些职位所需的能力的干预措施。虽然这些举措一般都是善意的,但它们往往基于(并强化)对妇女所缺乏的东西的陈规定型观念。这种缺陷模式导致干预措施试图 "修复 "妇女,而不是解决作为性别不平等根源的结构性因素。我们对相关文献进行了批判性评估,为 "修复 "妇女不太可能取得成功提供了证据基础。作为一种替代方法,我们将重点放在了解组织环境和文化如何通过塑造和限制(a)女性的动机和抱负,以及(b)女性技能和特质的表达和诠释,来维持这些不平等现象。在这样做的过程中,我们试图将干预重点从妇女本身转移到她们所处的系统和结构上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annual review of psychology
Annual review of psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
47.30
自引率
0.80%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Psychology, a publication that has been available since 1950, provides comprehensive coverage of the latest advancements in psychological research. It encompasses a wide range of topics, including the biological underpinnings of human behavior, the intricacies of our senses and perception, the functioning of the mind, animal behavior and learning, human development, psychopathology, clinical and counseling psychology, social psychology, personality, environmental psychology, community psychology, and much more. In a recent development, the current volume of this esteemed journal has transitioned from a subscription-based model to an open access format as part of the Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open initiative. As a result, all articles published in this volume are now freely accessible to the public under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
期刊最新文献
Alexithymia: Towards an Experimental, Processual Affective Science with Effective Interventions Haptic Perception and Its Relation to Action The Power and Pitfalls of Social Norms Unawareness of Attitudes, Their Environmental Causes, and Their Behavioral Effects Partisan Bias in Political Judgment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1