Evaluation of Antibacterial Effect of New Sealer "Neoseal" and Two Commercially Used Endodontic Sealers against Enterococcus faecalis: An In Vitro Study.

Doaa Gamal Basta, Maria Rafaat Reslan, Mohammad Rayyan, Mohamed Sayed
{"title":"Evaluation of Antibacterial Effect of New Sealer \"Neoseal\" and Two Commercially Used Endodontic Sealers against <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Doaa Gamal Basta, Maria Rafaat Reslan, Mohammad Rayyan, Mohamed Sayed","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the antibacterial activity of three endodontic sealing materials, Neoseal, CeraSeal, and AH Plus against <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> bacteria <i>in vitro</i>.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The antibacterial activity of three endodontic sealing materials including two bioceramic sealers; NeoSEALER Flo (group I), CeraSeal (group II), and one epoxy resin sealer; AH Plus (group III) was investigated against <i>E. faecalis</i> bacteria American Type Cell Culture Collection (ATCC) 29212 (ATCC, Rockville, Maryland, USA). Using modified direct contact test (MDCT). The endodontic sealers were tested in contact with bacterial suspension when unset (20 minutes after mixing) and after setting, assessing the antibacterial activity of aged sealers after 1, 3, 7, and 14 days. Analyzing the collected data has been done with version 25.0 of the statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) IBM software (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA). Descriptive analyses were calculated using standard deviation (SD) and mean. Shapiro-Wilk test was done to detect the normality of the result values. Kruskal-Wallis test was then performed to test the level of significance between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 20 minutes - Group I showed higher bacterial count mean values (5,500 ± 500) and 0 values for groups II and III groups. After 1 day, the highest bacterial count mean values were in group III (54,333.3 ± 4,041.5) and 0 values for groups I and II. After 3 days - group III again recorded the highest bacterial count mean values (45,000 ± 5,000) and 0 values for I and II groups. After 7 days - Group III still recorded the highest bacterial count mean values (53,333.3 ± 1,527.5) and 0 values for groups I and II. After 14 days - Group III recorded the highest bacterial count mean values (56,000 ± 1,000) followed by group II (6,333.3 ± 577.4), and the least was group I (2,000 ± 500). Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant values between groups in all tested durations, <i>p</i> > 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sealing material AH Plus showed a strong bactericidal effect at the beginning but lost its ability after 24 hours. CeraSeal showed strong bactericidal activity from the beginning till the end of the first week but showed bacterial count at 14 days. Neoseal took 24 hours to show bactericidal effect and similar to CeraSeal showed bacterial count at 14 days; CeraSeal recorded the best results within the study.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Silicate-based (bioceramic) endodontic sealers can be the best available endodontic sealing material that is clinically beneficial in removing residual microbes which had survived irrigation protocols and chemomechanical preparation. How to cite this article: Basta DG, Reslan MR, Rayyan M, <i>et al</i>. Evaluation of Antibacterial Effect of New Sealer \"Neoseal\" and Two Commercially Used Endodontic Sealers against <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(11):871-876.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the antibacterial activity of three endodontic sealing materials, Neoseal, CeraSeal, and AH Plus against Enterococcus faecalis bacteria in vitro.

Materials and methods: The antibacterial activity of three endodontic sealing materials including two bioceramic sealers; NeoSEALER Flo (group I), CeraSeal (group II), and one epoxy resin sealer; AH Plus (group III) was investigated against E. faecalis bacteria American Type Cell Culture Collection (ATCC) 29212 (ATCC, Rockville, Maryland, USA). Using modified direct contact test (MDCT). The endodontic sealers were tested in contact with bacterial suspension when unset (20 minutes after mixing) and after setting, assessing the antibacterial activity of aged sealers after 1, 3, 7, and 14 days. Analyzing the collected data has been done with version 25.0 of the statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) IBM software (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA). Descriptive analyses were calculated using standard deviation (SD) and mean. Shapiro-Wilk test was done to detect the normality of the result values. Kruskal-Wallis test was then performed to test the level of significance between groups.

Results: After 20 minutes - Group I showed higher bacterial count mean values (5,500 ± 500) and 0 values for groups II and III groups. After 1 day, the highest bacterial count mean values were in group III (54,333.3 ± 4,041.5) and 0 values for groups I and II. After 3 days - group III again recorded the highest bacterial count mean values (45,000 ± 5,000) and 0 values for I and II groups. After 7 days - Group III still recorded the highest bacterial count mean values (53,333.3 ± 1,527.5) and 0 values for groups I and II. After 14 days - Group III recorded the highest bacterial count mean values (56,000 ± 1,000) followed by group II (6,333.3 ± 577.4), and the least was group I (2,000 ± 500). Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant values between groups in all tested durations, p > 0.05.

Conclusion: The sealing material AH Plus showed a strong bactericidal effect at the beginning but lost its ability after 24 hours. CeraSeal showed strong bactericidal activity from the beginning till the end of the first week but showed bacterial count at 14 days. Neoseal took 24 hours to show bactericidal effect and similar to CeraSeal showed bacterial count at 14 days; CeraSeal recorded the best results within the study.

Clinical significance: Silicate-based (bioceramic) endodontic sealers can be the best available endodontic sealing material that is clinically beneficial in removing residual microbes which had survived irrigation protocols and chemomechanical preparation. How to cite this article: Basta DG, Reslan MR, Rayyan M, et al. Evaluation of Antibacterial Effect of New Sealer "Neoseal" and Two Commercially Used Endodontic Sealers against Enterococcus faecalis: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(11):871-876.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估新型封闭剂 "Neoseal "和两种市售根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果:体外研究
目的:评估 Neoseal、CeraSeal 和 AH Plus 三种牙髓密封材料在体外对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性:研究了三种牙髓密封材料(包括两种生物陶瓷密封剂 NeoSEALER Flo(第一组)、CeraSeal(第二组)和一种环氧树脂密封剂 AH Plus(第三组))对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性。使用改良直接接触试验(MDCT)。牙髓密封剂在未凝固(混合后 20 分钟)和凝固后与细菌悬浮液接触进行测试,评估老化密封剂在 1、3、7 和 14 天后的抗菌活性。收集到的数据使用 IBM 软件(SPSS,美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥市)25.0 版社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)进行分析。使用标准差(SD)和平均值计算描述性分析。采用 Shapiro-Wilk 检验来检测结果值的正态性。然后进行 Kruskal-Wallis 检验,以检验组间的显著性水平:20 分钟后 - I 组的细菌计数平均值较高(5500 ± 500),II 组和 III 组的细菌计数平均值为 0。1 天后,细菌计数平均值最高的是 III 组(54 333.3 ± 4 041.5),I 组和 II 组为 0。3 天后,III 组再次录得最高的细菌计数平均值(45,000 ± 5,000),I 组和 II 组为 0。7 天后,III 组的细菌计数平均值仍然最高(53,333.3 ± 1,527.5),I 组和 II 组的细菌计数平均值为 0。14 天后,III 组的细菌计数平均值最高(56,000 ± 1,000),其次是 II 组(6,333.3 ± 577.4),最少的是 I 组(2,000 ± 500)。Kruskal-Wallis 检验表明,在所有测试持续时间内,组间数值差异显著,P > 0.05:密封材料 AH Plus 在开始时具有很强的杀菌效果,但 24 小时后就失去了杀菌能力。CeraSeal 从一开始到第一周结束都表现出很强的杀菌能力,但在 14 天后才出现细菌计数。Neoseal 在 24 小时后才显示出杀菌效果,与 CeraSeal 类似,在 14 天后才显示出细菌计数;CeraSeal 在研究中取得了最好的结果:临床意义:硅酸盐基(生物陶瓷)根管封闭剂是目前最好的根管封闭材料,在临床上有利于清除经冲洗和化学机械制备后残留的微生物。本文引用方式Basta DG, Reslan MR, Rayyan M, et al. 新封闭剂 "Neoseal "和两种市售根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌抗菌效果的评估:体外研究。J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(11):871-876.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
期刊最新文献
Bibliometric Analysis of Botulinum Toxin and Bruxism: Impact, Visualization, and Collaborative Networks. Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Silver Nanoparticles Infused with Azadirachta indica Extract and Chlorhexidine Against Red-complex Pathogens. Comparative Evaluation of Platelet-rich Fibrin and Treated Dentin Matrix in Regenerative Endodontic Treatment of Nonvital Immature Permanent Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Comparison of Direct Intraoral Scan and Traditional Impression for CAD/CAM Mandibular Overdenture Base: RCT on Peri-implant Marginal Bone Changes. Comparison of Khoury's Bone Shell Technique vs Titanium-reinforced Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane for 3D-bone Augmentation in Atrophic Posterior Mandible: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1