Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) with pit excision versus Limberg Flap in pilonidal disease: A prospective, randomized study

Tharun Ganapathy Chitrambalam, Nidhi Mariam George, Lokesh Reddy, Pradeep Joshua Christopher, Sundeep Selvamuthukumaran
{"title":"Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) with pit excision versus Limberg Flap in pilonidal disease: A prospective, randomized study","authors":"Tharun Ganapathy Chitrambalam,&nbsp;Nidhi Mariam George,&nbsp;Lokesh Reddy,&nbsp;Pradeep Joshua Christopher,&nbsp;Sundeep Selvamuthukumaran","doi":"10.1016/j.soda.2023.100126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pilonidal disease is a chronic suppurative condition of the natal cleft associated with significant morbidity primarily affecting the working population causing daily discomfort and activity limitation. Although several treatment modalities have been suggested for the management of this condition, the gold standard continues to be undefined. We conducted a randomized prospective study on the treatment of Pilonidal disease by Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) compared with Limberg Flap.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>100 patients with primary Pilonidal disease were randomized to undergo either SiLaC or Limberg Flap. The primary objective of our study was to establish the advantage of SiLaC over Limberg Flap in terms of the operative time, postoperative pain, duration of hospital stay, healing time, cosmesis and recurrence rates over a period of 2 years. The patient satisfaction and return to normal activities were also documented.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We analysed a total of 50 cases that underwent SiLaC and 50 that underwent Limberg Flap with similar demographic characteristics. Significantly lower operative time was noted in the SiLaC group. SiLaC was associated with decreased postoperative pain and duration of hospital stay with faster healing and better cosmetic outcome. The patient satisfaction and return to normal activites were also reported to be better in the SiLaC group. Recurrence was reported in 4 patients in SiLaC group versus 6 patients in Limberg Flap group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study reports SiLaC as superior to Limberg Flap with shorter operative time, lower pain scores, length of hospital stay, faster healing time, decreased recurrence rates and good cosmetic satisfaction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101190,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Open Digestive Advance","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667008923000484/pdfft?md5=a407bb19cf9ff4335168e0b2b711ba5e&pid=1-s2.0-S2667008923000484-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Open Digestive Advance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667008923000484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pilonidal disease is a chronic suppurative condition of the natal cleft associated with significant morbidity primarily affecting the working population causing daily discomfort and activity limitation. Although several treatment modalities have been suggested for the management of this condition, the gold standard continues to be undefined. We conducted a randomized prospective study on the treatment of Pilonidal disease by Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) compared with Limberg Flap.

Materials and methods

100 patients with primary Pilonidal disease were randomized to undergo either SiLaC or Limberg Flap. The primary objective of our study was to establish the advantage of SiLaC over Limberg Flap in terms of the operative time, postoperative pain, duration of hospital stay, healing time, cosmesis and recurrence rates over a period of 2 years. The patient satisfaction and return to normal activities were also documented.

Results

We analysed a total of 50 cases that underwent SiLaC and 50 that underwent Limberg Flap with similar demographic characteristics. Significantly lower operative time was noted in the SiLaC group. SiLaC was associated with decreased postoperative pain and duration of hospital stay with faster healing and better cosmetic outcome. The patient satisfaction and return to normal activites were also reported to be better in the SiLaC group. Recurrence was reported in 4 patients in SiLaC group versus 6 patients in Limberg Flap group.

Conclusion

Our study reports SiLaC as superior to Limberg Flap with shorter operative time, lower pain scores, length of hospital stay, faster healing time, decreased recurrence rates and good cosmetic satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
窦激光闭合术(SiLaC)配合凹陷切除术与林贝格皮瓣术治疗朝天鼻病:前瞻性随机研究
背景乳头状脓肿病是一种慢性化脓性产道裂隙疾病,发病率很高,主要影响工作人群,造成日常不适和活动受限。虽然有多种治疗方法可用于治疗这种疾病,但其金标准仍未确定。我们进行了一项随机前瞻性研究,比较窦激光闭合术(SiLaC)与林贝格皮瓣术治疗乳突疾病的效果。我们研究的主要目的是确定 SiLaC 与 Limberg 皮瓣相比,在手术时间、术后疼痛、住院时间、愈合时间、外观和两年内复发率方面的优势。结果 我们分析了 50 个接受 SiLaC 手术的病例和 50 个接受 Limberg 皮瓣手术的病例,他们的人口统计学特征相似。SiLaC组的手术时间明显缩短。SiLaC术后疼痛减轻,住院时间缩短,愈合更快,美容效果更好。据报道,SiLaC 组患者的满意度和恢复正常活动的情况也更好。结论:我们的研究报告显示,SiLaC优于Limberg皮瓣,手术时间短,疼痛评分低,住院时间长,愈合时间快,复发率低,美容满意度高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rheumatoid purpura and gastrointestinal obstruction Main surgical steps of right posterior sectionectomy (with video) Subcutaneous onlay laparoscopic approach (SCOLA) mesh repair for umbilical hernia and diastasis recti: Technical description (with video) Associated factors with nonoperative management failure in bowel obstruction Laparoscopic proctocolectomy in Crohn's disease with complete mesocolic excision and total mesorectal excision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1