Advancing environmental assessment of the circular economy: Challenges and opportunities

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Resources, conservation & recycling advances Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.rcradv.2024.200203
Dwarakanath Ravikumar , Gregory A. Keoleian , Julien Walzberg , Garvin Heath , Martin C. Heller
{"title":"Advancing environmental assessment of the circular economy: Challenges and opportunities","authors":"Dwarakanath Ravikumar ,&nbsp;Gregory A. Keoleian ,&nbsp;Julien Walzberg ,&nbsp;Garvin Heath ,&nbsp;Martin C. Heller","doi":"10.1016/j.rcradv.2024.200203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The lifecycle assessment (LCA) framework is widely applied to comprehensively evaluate and improve the environmental performance of a circular economy (CE). The advances and application of LCA has been primarily restricted to evaluate the environmental performance of the CE at a micro-level, wherein the CE is implemented for a single product system.</p><p>However, the CE can be operationalized at two broader levels: the meso–level (for eco-industrial parks) and the macro-level (for a city, state, or nation). Six methodological challenges emerge when applying LCA to a meso‑ or macro-level CE and remain unaddressed in the existing literature. This includes: selecting a relevant system boundary and functional unit, addressing data paucity and uncertainty, accounting for stakeholder behavior, assessing the trade-offs from renewable energy (RE) use, accounting for manufacturing and technology evolution, and quantifying displacement and rebound. This article proposes potential solutions and research priorities to address the above challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74689,"journal":{"name":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 200203"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667378924000026/pdfft?md5=3c6c5670953a35642ca14ebe67342c45&pid=1-s2.0-S2667378924000026-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667378924000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lifecycle assessment (LCA) framework is widely applied to comprehensively evaluate and improve the environmental performance of a circular economy (CE). The advances and application of LCA has been primarily restricted to evaluate the environmental performance of the CE at a micro-level, wherein the CE is implemented for a single product system.

However, the CE can be operationalized at two broader levels: the meso–level (for eco-industrial parks) and the macro-level (for a city, state, or nation). Six methodological challenges emerge when applying LCA to a meso‑ or macro-level CE and remain unaddressed in the existing literature. This includes: selecting a relevant system boundary and functional unit, addressing data paucity and uncertainty, accounting for stakeholder behavior, assessing the trade-offs from renewable energy (RE) use, accounting for manufacturing and technology evolution, and quantifying displacement and rebound. This article proposes potential solutions and research priorities to address the above challenges.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进循环经济的环境评估:挑战与机遇
生命周期评估(LCA)框架被广泛应用于全面评估和改善循环经济(CE)的环境绩效。生命周期评估的进展和应用主要局限于在微观层面评估循环经济的环境绩效,即针对单一产品系统实施循环经济。然而,循环经济可以在两个更广泛的层面上运作:中观层面(生态工业园区)和宏观层面(城市、州或国家)。在将生命周期评估应用于中观或宏观层面的生态工业园区时,会出现六个方法上的挑战,而现有文献尚未解决这些挑战。这包括:选择相关的系统边界和功能单元、解决数据匮乏和不确定性、考虑利益相关者的行为、评估可再生能源(RE)使用的权衡、考虑制造和技术演进以及量化替代和反弹。本文提出了应对上述挑战的潜在解决方案和研究重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources, conservation & recycling advances
Resources, conservation & recycling advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and preferences of the Chinese public towards products made from recycled materials: A text mining approach Decoding sustainable consumption behavior: A systematic review of theories and models and provision of a guidance framework A two-step approach to recycling hydroponics waste nutrient solutions using fertiliser drawn forward osmosis and chemical precipitation Electrolysis and waste heat utilisation in the sustainable transition of Germany's energy system Cost factors affecting the utilisation of secondary materials in the construction sector: A systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1