50 Years of terrorism in Belgium: a review of 121 incidents in the global terrorism database.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Acta Chirurgica Belgica Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1080/00015458.2024.2308400
Harald De Cauwer, Luc J Mortelmans, Francis Somville, Patrick Cras
{"title":"50 Years of terrorism in Belgium: a review of 121 incidents in the global terrorism database.","authors":"Harald De Cauwer, Luc J Mortelmans, Francis Somville, Patrick Cras","doi":"10.1080/00015458.2024.2308400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Belgium is not only prone to inland terrorism but also attracts terrorist factions aiming at various political, diplomatic, military, and/or religious targets. This study aimed to identify and characterize all documented terrorist attacks in Belgium reported to the Global Terrorism Database (GTD) over a period of 50 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The GTD was searched for all terrorist attacks in Belgium between 1970 and 2019. Analyses were performed on temporal factors, location, target type, attack and weapon type, attacker type, and number of casualties or hostages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 50 years, 121 incidents accounted for 80 confirmed fatalities and 498 injured people. Bombings and explosions were the most frequently identified attack type (46.3%), followed by assassination (16.5%), infrastructure damage (15.7%) and armed or unarmed assaults (14.0%). Governmental and diplomatic institutions were the most frequent target (24.0%). For those perpetrators the GTD did have enough information we saw a timely change from far left and separatist dominating the early decades to Jihadi groups in the last decade, while anti-semitic factions were active in every decade.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In contrast to other studies, this study did not show an increase over time. Left-wing perpetrators dominated the eighties. In 50 years of terrorist activity in Belgium, the health care system was spared. Devastating mass casualty attacks challenging the health care system are rare in Belgium.</p>","PeriodicalId":6935,"journal":{"name":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":"349-355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2024.2308400","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Belgium is not only prone to inland terrorism but also attracts terrorist factions aiming at various political, diplomatic, military, and/or religious targets. This study aimed to identify and characterize all documented terrorist attacks in Belgium reported to the Global Terrorism Database (GTD) over a period of 50 years.

Methods: The GTD was searched for all terrorist attacks in Belgium between 1970 and 2019. Analyses were performed on temporal factors, location, target type, attack and weapon type, attacker type, and number of casualties or hostages.

Results: In 50 years, 121 incidents accounted for 80 confirmed fatalities and 498 injured people. Bombings and explosions were the most frequently identified attack type (46.3%), followed by assassination (16.5%), infrastructure damage (15.7%) and armed or unarmed assaults (14.0%). Governmental and diplomatic institutions were the most frequent target (24.0%). For those perpetrators the GTD did have enough information we saw a timely change from far left and separatist dominating the early decades to Jihadi groups in the last decade, while anti-semitic factions were active in every decade.

Conclusion: In contrast to other studies, this study did not show an increase over time. Left-wing perpetrators dominated the eighties. In 50 years of terrorist activity in Belgium, the health care system was spared. Devastating mass casualty attacks challenging the health care system are rare in Belgium.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比利时恐怖主义 50 年:对全球恐怖主义数据库中 121 起事件的审查。
目标:比利时不仅容易发生内陆恐怖主义,而且还吸引了以各种政治、外交、军事和/或宗教目标为目标的恐怖主义派别。本研究旨在确定全球恐怖主义数据库(Global Terrorism Database,GTD)所收录的 50 年来比利时发生的所有恐怖袭击事件,并分析其特点:方法:在全球恐怖主义数据库(GTD)中搜索了 1970 年至 2019 年期间比利时发生的所有恐怖袭击事件。对时间因素、地点、目标类型、袭击和武器类型、袭击者类型以及伤亡或人质数量进行了分析:50 年间,121 起事件造成 80 人确认死亡,498 人受伤。炸弹和爆炸是最常见的袭击类型(46.3%),其次是暗杀(16.5%)、基础设施破坏(15.7%)和武装或非武装袭击(14.0%)。政府和外交机构是最常见的袭击目标(24.0%)。对于那些GTD掌握足够信息的犯罪者,我们看到了一个及时的变化,从最初几十年以极左和分裂主义为主,到最近十年以圣战组织为主,而反犹主义派别在每个十年都很活跃:与其他研究相比,本研究并未显示出随时间推移而增加的趋势。左翼犯罪分子在八十年代占主导地位。在比利时 50 年的恐怖活动中,医疗保健系统幸免于难。在比利时,针对医疗保健系统的大规模杀伤性袭击十分罕见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Chirurgica Belgica
Acta Chirurgica Belgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Chirurgica Belgica (ACB) is the official journal of the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery (RBSS) and its affiliated societies. It publishes Editorials, Review papers, Original Research, and Technique related manuscripts in the broad field of Clinical Surgery.
期刊最新文献
Early parathyroid hormone (PTH) level as a predictor of post-surgical hypoparathyroidism. Comparison of short‑term outcomes and 3-year overall survival between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Baron Antoine Dubois and the difficult childbirth of Napoleon I's second wife the Empress Marie Louise on 20 March 1811. The effect of thoracic trauma scoring system in thoracic trauma patients with rib fracture. Pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) with central nervous system metastasis: case report, imaging findings, and review of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1