Calibrating ecosystem models to support ecosystem-based management of marine systems

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES ICES Journal of Marine Science Pub Date : 2024-01-24 DOI:10.1093/icesjms/fsad213
Jacob W Bentley, David Chagaris, Marta Coll, Johanna J Heymans, Natalia Serpetti, Carl J Walters, Villy Christensen
{"title":"Calibrating ecosystem models to support ecosystem-based management of marine systems","authors":"Jacob W Bentley, David Chagaris, Marta Coll, Johanna J Heymans, Natalia Serpetti, Carl J Walters, Villy Christensen","doi":"10.1093/icesjms/fsad213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ecosystem models, such as Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE), provide a platform to simulate intricate policy scenarios where multiple species, pressures, and ecosystem services interact. Complex questions often return complex answers, necessitating evidence and advice to be communicated in terms of trade-offs, risks, and uncertainty. Calibration procedures for EwE, which can act as a source of uncertainty and bias in model results, have yet to be explored in a comprehensive way that communicates how sensitive model outputs are to different calibration approaches. As the EwE community has grown, multiple divergent approaches have been applied to calibrate models through the estimation of vulnerability multipliers: parameters that augment the consumption rate limits of predators. Here we explore the underlying principles of vulnerability multipliers as well as existing calibration approaches and their justification. Two case studies are presented: the first explores how vulnerability multipliers emerge based on the chosen calibration approach using simulated data, while the second takes two operational EwE models (Irish Sea and Northwest Atlantic Continental Shelf) and compares their outputs when calibrated following alternate calibration approaches. We show how calibration approaches can impact model-derived advice and provide a list of best practice recommendations for EwE calibration.","PeriodicalId":51072,"journal":{"name":"ICES Journal of Marine Science","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICES Journal of Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsad213","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecosystem models, such as Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE), provide a platform to simulate intricate policy scenarios where multiple species, pressures, and ecosystem services interact. Complex questions often return complex answers, necessitating evidence and advice to be communicated in terms of trade-offs, risks, and uncertainty. Calibration procedures for EwE, which can act as a source of uncertainty and bias in model results, have yet to be explored in a comprehensive way that communicates how sensitive model outputs are to different calibration approaches. As the EwE community has grown, multiple divergent approaches have been applied to calibrate models through the estimation of vulnerability multipliers: parameters that augment the consumption rate limits of predators. Here we explore the underlying principles of vulnerability multipliers as well as existing calibration approaches and their justification. Two case studies are presented: the first explores how vulnerability multipliers emerge based on the chosen calibration approach using simulated data, while the second takes two operational EwE models (Irish Sea and Northwest Atlantic Continental Shelf) and compares their outputs when calibrated following alternate calibration approaches. We show how calibration approaches can impact model-derived advice and provide a list of best practice recommendations for EwE calibration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
校准生态系统模型,支持基于生态系统的海洋系统管理
生态系统模型(如 Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE))提供了一个平台,可模拟多种物种、压力和生态系统服务相互作用的复杂政策情景。复杂的问题往往会得到复杂的答案,因此需要根据权衡、风险和不确定性来传达证据和建议。EwE 的校准程序可作为模型结果中不确定性和偏差的来源,但目前尚未对其进行全面探讨,以说明模型输出对不同校准方法的敏感程度。随着 EwE 社区的发展,多种不同的方法已被用于通过估计脆弱性乘数来校准模型:这些参数可增加捕食者的消耗率限制。在此,我们将探讨脆弱性乘数的基本原理以及现有的校准方法及其合理性。本文介绍了两个案例研究:第一个案例利用模拟数据探讨了脆弱性乘数是如何根据所选校准方法产生的;第二个案例采用了两个正在运行的 EwE 模型(爱尔兰海和西北大西洋大陆架),并比较了它们在采用其他校准方法进行校准后的输出结果。我们展示了校准方法如何影响模型得出的建议,并提供了一份 EwE 校准最佳实践建议清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ICES Journal of Marine Science
ICES Journal of Marine Science 农林科学-海洋学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The ICES Journal of Marine Science publishes original articles, opinion essays (“Food for Thought”), visions for the future (“Quo Vadimus”), and critical reviews that contribute to our scientific understanding of marine systems and the impact of human activities on them. The Journal also serves as a foundation for scientific advice across the broad spectrum of management and conservation issues related to the marine environment. Oceanography (e.g. productivity-determining processes), marine habitats, living resources, and related topics constitute the key elements of papers considered for publication. This includes economic, social, and public administration studies to the extent that they are directly related to management of the seas and are of general interest to marine scientists. Integrated studies that bridge gaps between traditional disciplines are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Adaptive small-scale fisheries in the eastern Cantabrian coast through reliance on essential species A roadmap for generating annual bycatch estimates from sparse at-sea observer data Assessing the value of harmful algal bloom forecasts in the Pacific Northwest Uncrewed surface vehicles (USVs) as platforms for fisheries and plankton acoustics Trophic flows to mesozooplankton support the conventional paradigm of pelagic food web structure in ocean ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1