P281 The role of transabdominal ultrasound in evaluating Ulcerative Colitis disease activity and predicting treatment response

M Peng, T Pu, Y Zhao
{"title":"P281 The role of transabdominal ultrasound in evaluating Ulcerative Colitis disease activity and predicting treatment response","authors":"M Peng, T Pu, Y Zhao","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background As a non-invasive, accurate, and feasible examination, transabdominal ultrasound(TAUS) is of great value in disease monitoring of ulcerative colitis. The cut-off for disease activity of 3.0 or 4.0 mm is often debated, and studies lacked assessment of treatment response. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of TAUS in detecting disease activity in adult patients with UC using endoscopy as the reference standard and evaluate TAUS for treatment response in a longitudinal cohort. Methods This study prospectively consecutive adult patients with an established diagnosis of UC in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between June 2022 and September 2023. The patients with moderate-to-severe disease activity at baseline should have follow-up endoscopic assessment after induction, with available corresponding TAUS. The primary outcome of this study was the difference in BWT in the descending colon(DC) or sigmoid colon(SC) for patients with and without segmental endoscopic response after treatment. Endoscopic remission was defined as MES=0-1 or UCEIS=0-1, and Endoscopic response as a decrease of MES ≥1 or a reduction of UCEIS ≥2. Results A total of 315 colon segments in 80 patients were included. 171 (54.3%) colorectal segments had endoscopic remission and 144(45.7%) were in endoscopic activity. The TAUS parameters correlated with the Mayo endoscopic sub-score with significant differences between patients in endoscopic remission and patients in endoscopic activity. And we found 3.45mm(AUROC 0.833;95%CI 0.789-0.878, P<0.001) to be the cutoff for endoscopic remission with 78% sensitivity and 75% specificity. The multivariable analysis identified BWT, the Colour Doppler Signal(CDS), and the wall layer stratification as independent predictors for endoscopic activity( P<0.001、=0.004、=0.001). BWT in the DC or SC was significantly lower in patients with endoscopic response than those without after treatment. A 28% decrease in BWT from baseline predicted endoscopic response [AUROC 0.743;95%CI 0.589-0.896, P=0.015] with 58% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Multivariable analysis among all the ultrasound parameters considered normal wall layer stratification at baseline as the only independent predictor of endoscopic response at reassessment (odds ratio [OR]23.334, 95% CI 2.257-241.219; p = 0.008). Conclusion TAUS, importantly BWT, CDS, and wall layer stratification as the crucial parameters, is highly accurate in detecting disease activity and treatment response when evaluated against endoscopic outcomes. Normal intestinal wall stratification at baseline predicts long-term endoscopic response.","PeriodicalId":15453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background As a non-invasive, accurate, and feasible examination, transabdominal ultrasound(TAUS) is of great value in disease monitoring of ulcerative colitis. The cut-off for disease activity of 3.0 or 4.0 mm is often debated, and studies lacked assessment of treatment response. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of TAUS in detecting disease activity in adult patients with UC using endoscopy as the reference standard and evaluate TAUS for treatment response in a longitudinal cohort. Methods This study prospectively consecutive adult patients with an established diagnosis of UC in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between June 2022 and September 2023. The patients with moderate-to-severe disease activity at baseline should have follow-up endoscopic assessment after induction, with available corresponding TAUS. The primary outcome of this study was the difference in BWT in the descending colon(DC) or sigmoid colon(SC) for patients with and without segmental endoscopic response after treatment. Endoscopic remission was defined as MES=0-1 or UCEIS=0-1, and Endoscopic response as a decrease of MES ≥1 or a reduction of UCEIS ≥2. Results A total of 315 colon segments in 80 patients were included. 171 (54.3%) colorectal segments had endoscopic remission and 144(45.7%) were in endoscopic activity. The TAUS parameters correlated with the Mayo endoscopic sub-score with significant differences between patients in endoscopic remission and patients in endoscopic activity. And we found 3.45mm(AUROC 0.833;95%CI 0.789-0.878, P<0.001) to be the cutoff for endoscopic remission with 78% sensitivity and 75% specificity. The multivariable analysis identified BWT, the Colour Doppler Signal(CDS), and the wall layer stratification as independent predictors for endoscopic activity( P<0.001、=0.004、=0.001). BWT in the DC or SC was significantly lower in patients with endoscopic response than those without after treatment. A 28% decrease in BWT from baseline predicted endoscopic response [AUROC 0.743;95%CI 0.589-0.896, P=0.015] with 58% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Multivariable analysis among all the ultrasound parameters considered normal wall layer stratification at baseline as the only independent predictor of endoscopic response at reassessment (odds ratio [OR]23.334, 95% CI 2.257-241.219; p = 0.008). Conclusion TAUS, importantly BWT, CDS, and wall layer stratification as the crucial parameters, is highly accurate in detecting disease activity and treatment response when evaluated against endoscopic outcomes. Normal intestinal wall stratification at baseline predicts long-term endoscopic response.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P281 经腹超声在评估溃疡性结肠炎疾病活动性和预测治疗反应中的作用
背景 经腹超声(TAUS)是一种无创、准确、可行的检查方法,在溃疡性结肠炎的疾病监测中具有重要价值。在溃疡性结肠炎的疾病监测中具有重要价值。关于疾病活动度为 3.0 或 4.0 mm 的临界值常有争议,且研究缺乏对治疗反应的评估。本研究旨在以内镜检查为参考标准,评估TAUS检测成年溃疡性结肠炎患者疾病活动性的诊断准确性,并在纵向队列中评估TAUS的治疗反应。方法 本研究于2022年6月至2023年9月期间在郑州大学第一附属医院连续对确诊为UC的成年患者进行前瞻性研究。基线时有中重度疾病活动的患者应在诱导治疗后进行随访内镜评估,并提供相应的TAUS。本研究的主要结果是治疗后有和无节段性内镜反应患者的降结肠(DC)或乙状结肠(SC)BWT差异。MES=0-1或UCEIS=0-1为内镜缓解,MES下降≥1或UCEIS下降≥2为内镜反应。结果 共纳入了 80 名患者的 315 个结肠节段。171个(54.3%)结直肠节段在内镜下缓解,144个(45.7%)在内镜下活动。TAUS 参数与梅奥内镜次级评分相关,内镜缓解患者与内镜活动患者之间存在显著差异。我们发现 3.45mm(AUROC 0.833;95%CI 0.789-0.878,P<0.001)是内镜缓解的临界值,敏感性为 78%,特异性为 75%。多变量分析发现,BWT、彩色多普勒信号(CDS)和壁层分层是内镜活动的独立预测因子(P<0.001、=0.004、=0.001)。治疗后,有内镜反应的患者 DC 或 SC 的 BWT 明显低于无内镜反应的患者。BWT比基线下降28%可预测内镜反应[AUROC 0.743;95%CI 0.589-0.896,P=0.015],敏感性为58%,特异性为93%。对所有超声参数进行的多变量分析表明,基线时正常壁层分层是再次评估时内镜反应的唯一独立预测因素(比值比 [OR]23.334, 95%CI 2.257-241.219;P = 0.008)。结论 TAUS 以 BWT、CDS 和肠壁分层为重要参数,在根据内镜结果进行评估时,能高度准确地检测出疾病活动性和治疗反应。基线肠壁分层正常可预测长期内镜反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prolonged time to diagnosis of Crohn’s disease in patients with perianal fistulas negatively affects long-term outcomes Oxidized polyunsaturated fatty acid promotes colitis and colitis-associated tumorigenesis in mice Prevalence, characteristics, management, and outcomes of difficult-to-treat inflammatory bowel disease IL23R-specific CAR Tregs for the treatment of Crohn’s disease Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: a review of the role of gut microbiota and bacterial biofilms in disease pathogenesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1