Knowledge of non-contraceptive benefits of and willingness to consider taking oral contraceptive pills among a low-risk female population: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1080/13625187.2023.2300944
Caitlin Alsandria O'Hara, Teoh Wei Shan, Joseph Ng Soon Yau
{"title":"Knowledge of non-contraceptive benefits of and willingness to consider taking oral contraceptive pills among a low-risk female population: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Caitlin Alsandria O'Hara, Teoh Wei Shan, Joseph Ng Soon Yau","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2023.2300944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In addition to its widely-appreciated contraceptive applications, the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) conveys both oncological and non-oncological benefits. Oncological benefits include a decreased risk of endometrial, ovarian, and colorectal cancer. Non-oncological benefits include reducing androgenic effects and alleviating menstruation-related problems. This study aimed to ascertain knowledge levels of non-contraceptive benefits and risks of OCP use among participants without contraindications to OCPs. This study also assessed factors associated with participants being more likely to consider taking OCPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>263 women aged 21 to 40 years old with no contraindications for OCP usage participated in this study. An anonymous questionnaire collected sociodemographic information and assessed participants' knowledge of the non-contraceptive benefits and risks associated with OCP use. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess factors associated with knowledge levels. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate factors associated with being more likely to consider taking OCPs among women who did not presently take them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate logistic regression revealed that participants who were more knowledgeable overall about the non-contraceptive benefits of OCPs were more likely to consider taking OCPs (coefficient = 0.184, <i>p</i>-value = 0.00). Knowledge of both oncological and non-oncological benefits of OCP use was relatively poor, especially among older women. Current OCP users were found to be more knowledgeable about their benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As women with greater knowledge of non-contraceptive benefits of OCPs are more likely to consider taking them, knowledge gaps regarding OCPs should be filled, so that more women may reap the non-contraceptive benefits of OCPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2023.2300944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In addition to its widely-appreciated contraceptive applications, the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) conveys both oncological and non-oncological benefits. Oncological benefits include a decreased risk of endometrial, ovarian, and colorectal cancer. Non-oncological benefits include reducing androgenic effects and alleviating menstruation-related problems. This study aimed to ascertain knowledge levels of non-contraceptive benefits and risks of OCP use among participants without contraindications to OCPs. This study also assessed factors associated with participants being more likely to consider taking OCPs.

Methods: 263 women aged 21 to 40 years old with no contraindications for OCP usage participated in this study. An anonymous questionnaire collected sociodemographic information and assessed participants' knowledge of the non-contraceptive benefits and risks associated with OCP use. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess factors associated with knowledge levels. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate factors associated with being more likely to consider taking OCPs among women who did not presently take them.

Results: Multivariate logistic regression revealed that participants who were more knowledgeable overall about the non-contraceptive benefits of OCPs were more likely to consider taking OCPs (coefficient = 0.184, p-value = 0.00). Knowledge of both oncological and non-oncological benefits of OCP use was relatively poor, especially among older women. Current OCP users were found to be more knowledgeable about their benefits.

Conclusions: As women with greater knowledge of non-contraceptive benefits of OCPs are more likely to consider taking them, knowledge gaps regarding OCPs should be filled, so that more women may reap the non-contraceptive benefits of OCPs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项横断面研究:低风险女性人群对口服避孕药非避孕益处的了解以及考虑服用口服避孕药的意愿。
背景:口服避孕药(OCP)除了广泛应用于避孕之外,还具有肿瘤和非肿瘤方面的益处。肿瘤方面的益处包括降低罹患子宫内膜癌、卵巢癌和结肠直肠癌的风险。非肿瘤学益处包括降低雄激素效应和缓解月经相关问题。本研究旨在确定无 OCP 禁忌症的参与者对使用 OCP 的非避孕益处和风险的了解程度。本研究还评估了与参与者更有可能考虑服用 OCP 相关的因素。方法:263 名年龄在 21-40 岁之间、无 OCP 使用禁忌症的女性参与了本研究。一份匿名问卷收集了社会人口学信息,并评估了参与者对使用 OCP 相关的非避孕益处和风险的了解程度。多变量线性回归用于评估与知识水平相关的因素。多变量逻辑回归用于调查与目前未服用 OCPs 的妇女更有可能考虑服用 OCPs 的相关因素:多变量逻辑回归显示,对 OCPs 的非避孕益处总体了解较多的参与者更有可能考虑服用 OCPs(系数 = 0.184,P 值 = 0.00)。对使用 OCP 的肿瘤学和非肿瘤学益处的了解相对较少,尤其是在老年妇女中。结论:结论:由于对 OCPs 的非避孕益处有更多了解的妇女更有可能考虑服用 OCPs,因此应填补有关 OCPs 的知识空白,以便让更多妇女获得 OCPs 的非避孕益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health, The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material.
期刊最新文献
A randomised double-blind trial to determine the bleeding profile of the prolonged-release contraceptive dienogest 2 mg/ethinylestradiol 0.02 mg versus an immediate-release formulation of drospirenone 3 mg/ethinylestradiol 0.02 mg. Medical termination of pregnancy: people's expectations and experiences in the Netherlands. Neighbourhood environment and early menarche among adolescent girls of five countries. Postpartum contraception provision across Europe: preliminary findings from a multi country survey. Response to Daungsupawong and Wiwanitkit's Letter to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1