Medical management of painful achalasia: a patient-driven systematic review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Diseases of the Esophagus Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI:10.1093/dote/doae005
Solange Bramer, Amanda Ladell, Hannah Glatzel, Alan Moss, Majid Hashemi, Giovanni Zaninotto, Stefan Antonowicz
{"title":"Medical management of painful achalasia: a patient-driven systematic review.","authors":"Solange Bramer, Amanda Ladell, Hannah Glatzel, Alan Moss, Majid Hashemi, Giovanni Zaninotto, Stefan Antonowicz","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Achalasia is a rare esophageal disorder characterized by abnormal esophageal motility and swallowing difficulties. Pain and/or spasms often persist or recur despite effective relief of the obstruction. A survey by UK charity 'Achalasia Action' highlighted treatments for achalasia pain/spasms as a key research priority. In this patient-requested systematic review, we assessed the existing literature on pharmacological therapies for painful achalasia. A systematic review of the literature using Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies evaluating pharmacological therapies for achalasia. Methodological quality of included randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. In total, 70% (40/57) of survey respondents reported experiencing pain/spasms. A range of management strategies were reported. Thirteen studies were included in the review. Seven were randomized controlled trials. Most studies were >30 years old, had limited follow-up, and focussed on esophageal manometry as the key endpoint. Generally, studies found improvements in lower esophageal pressures with medications. Only one study evaluated pain/spasm specifically, precluding meta-analysis. Overall risk of bias was high. The achalasia patient survey identified that pain/spasms are common and difficult to treat. This patient-requested review identified a gap in the literature regarding pharmacological treatments for these symptoms. We provide an algorithm for investigating achalasia-related pain/spasms. Calcium channel blockers or nitrates may be helpful when esophageal obstruction and reflux have been excluded. We advocate for registry-based clinical trials to expand the evidence base for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11060105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achalasia is a rare esophageal disorder characterized by abnormal esophageal motility and swallowing difficulties. Pain and/or spasms often persist or recur despite effective relief of the obstruction. A survey by UK charity 'Achalasia Action' highlighted treatments for achalasia pain/spasms as a key research priority. In this patient-requested systematic review, we assessed the existing literature on pharmacological therapies for painful achalasia. A systematic review of the literature using Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies evaluating pharmacological therapies for achalasia. Methodological quality of included randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. In total, 70% (40/57) of survey respondents reported experiencing pain/spasms. A range of management strategies were reported. Thirteen studies were included in the review. Seven were randomized controlled trials. Most studies were >30 years old, had limited follow-up, and focussed on esophageal manometry as the key endpoint. Generally, studies found improvements in lower esophageal pressures with medications. Only one study evaluated pain/spasm specifically, precluding meta-analysis. Overall risk of bias was high. The achalasia patient survey identified that pain/spasms are common and difficult to treat. This patient-requested review identified a gap in the literature regarding pharmacological treatments for these symptoms. We provide an algorithm for investigating achalasia-related pain/spasms. Calcium channel blockers or nitrates may be helpful when esophageal obstruction and reflux have been excluded. We advocate for registry-based clinical trials to expand the evidence base for these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疼痛性贲门失弛缓症的药物治疗:以患者为导向的系统性综述。
Achalasia 是一种罕见的食道疾病,其特征是食道运动异常和吞咽困难。尽管能有效缓解梗阻,但疼痛和/或痉挛常常持续存在或复发。英国慈善机构 "贲门失弛缓症行动"(Achalasia Action)的一项调查强调,贲门失弛缓症疼痛/痉挛的治疗是研究的重点。在这项患者要求的系统性综述中,我们评估了有关贲门失弛缓症疼痛药物疗法的现有文献。我们使用 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库对文献进行了系统性回顾,以确定评估贲门失弛缓症药物疗法的研究。采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具对纳入的随机对照试验进行了方法学质量评估。总共有 70% (40/57)的调查对象表示曾经历过疼痛/痉挛。报告了一系列治疗策略。13 项研究被纳入综述。其中七项为随机对照试验。大多数研究的研究时间超过 30 年,随访时间有限,并将食管测压作为关键终点。一般来说,研究发现药物治疗可改善食管下段压力。只有一项研究对疼痛/痉挛进行了专门评估,因此无法进行荟萃分析。总体偏倚风险较高。贲门失弛缓症患者调查发现,疼痛/痉挛很常见且难以治疗。这项应患者要求进行的综述发现了有关这些症状药物治疗的文献空白。我们提供了一种研究贲门失弛缓症相关疼痛/痉挛的算法。在排除食道梗阻和反流的情况下,钙通道阻滞剂或硝酸盐可能会有所帮助。我们主张开展以登记为基础的临床试验,以扩大这些患者的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
期刊最新文献
High prevalence of esophageal motility disorders in patients with rheumatologic diseases. Sling fiber preservation during POEM reduces incidence of postoperative reflux symptoms. Impacts of intestinal fermentation on gastroesophageal reflux disease: can the tail wag the dog? Central ligation or partial preservation of the right gastric artery does not seem to affect conduit or anastomotic perfusion during robot-assisted resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Risk factors for readmission following esophagectomy and gastrectomy for cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1