‘Not so much thought out as danced out’: expanding philosophy of religion in the light of Candomblé

IF 0.5 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1017/s0034412523001130
Mikel Burley
{"title":"‘Not so much thought out as danced out’: expanding philosophy of religion in the light of Candomblé","authors":"Mikel Burley","doi":"10.1017/s0034412523001130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When the anthropologist R. R. Marett affirmed that certain forms of religion are ‘not so much thought out as danced out’ (1914, xxxi), he was, in effect, anticipating a criticism that has been levelled at philosophy of religion in recent decades – namely, the criticism that this branch of philosophy has frequently underplayed the extent to which religions often prioritize ritual activities (including dance) over intellectual matters. Taking Marett's observation as a point of departure, this article reflects philosophically on the Afro-Brazilian tradition of Candomblé as an exemplary case. Special attention is given to the themes of (a) dance as a mode of ‘gestural language’ (Wafer 1991, 178) and (b) ‘embodied knowledge’ (Daniel 2005). It is argued that these themes supply opportunities to enrich our understanding not only of a significant dimension of religion – that is, the dimension of dance – but also of what communication and knowledge can amount to in both religious and non-religious contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45888,"journal":{"name":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1095","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412523001130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When the anthropologist R. R. Marett affirmed that certain forms of religion are ‘not so much thought out as danced out’ (1914, xxxi), he was, in effect, anticipating a criticism that has been levelled at philosophy of religion in recent decades – namely, the criticism that this branch of philosophy has frequently underplayed the extent to which religions often prioritize ritual activities (including dance) over intellectual matters. Taking Marett's observation as a point of departure, this article reflects philosophically on the Afro-Brazilian tradition of Candomblé as an exemplary case. Special attention is given to the themes of (a) dance as a mode of ‘gestural language’ (Wafer 1991, 178) and (b) ‘embodied knowledge’ (Daniel 2005). It is argued that these themes supply opportunities to enrich our understanding not only of a significant dimension of religion – that is, the dimension of dance – but also of what communication and knowledge can amount to in both religious and non-religious contexts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与其说是想出来的,不如说是跳出来的":从坎东布雷看宗教哲学的扩展
人类学家马瑞特(R. R. Marett)认为,某些形式的宗教 "与其说是思考出来的,不如说是跳舞跳出来的"(1914 年,xxxi),他实际上预见到了近几十年来对宗教哲学的批评--即这一哲学分支经常轻视宗教往往将仪式活动(包括舞蹈)置于知识事务之上的程度。本文以马瑞特的观点为出发点,以非洲裔巴西人的坎东布雷传统为例,从哲学角度进行了反思。文章特别关注以下主题:(a) 作为 "姿态语言 "模式的舞蹈(Wafer,1991 年,178 页)和 (b) "体现知识"(Daniel,2005 年)。本文认为,这些主题不仅提供了丰富我们对宗教的一个重要层面--即舞蹈层面--的理解的机会,而且提供了丰富我们对宗教和非宗教背景下的交流和知识的理解的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
RELIGIOUS STUDIES
RELIGIOUS STUDIES RELIGION-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Religious Studies is an international journal devoted to the problems of the philosophy of religion as they arise out of classical and contemporary discussions and from varied religious traditions. More than 25 articles are published each year, and the journal also contains an extensive book review section.
期刊最新文献
One goodness, many goodnesses, and the Divine Ideas Imitation Theory Divine contradiction: fascinating but unpersuasive Divine Contradiction: some snippets Divine Contradiction: replies to critics Divine command theory and the (supposed) incoherence of self-commanding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1