Self-perceived talent status and employee outcomes: role of the organisational justice in Japanese learning organisations

N. Ishiyama, Hideki S. Tanaka
{"title":"Self-perceived talent status and employee outcomes: role of the organisational justice in Japanese learning organisations","authors":"N. Ishiyama, Hideki S. Tanaka","doi":"10.1108/tlo-05-2023-0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine the relationship between self-perceived talent status (SPTS) and positive employee outcomes (work engagement and organisational commitment), mediated by organisational justice (distributive and procedural justice). The authors define SPTS as employees’ self-conceptualisation of talent, formed by inferring the organisation’s initiatives regarding training and development opportunities and through informal recognition by others.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors measured SPTS using eight items on a five-point scale. Through an internet survey company, the authors initially surveyed 1,207 full-time employees from 300 Japanese companies with ≥ 300 employees. In the second round of the survey, conducted after approximately two weeks, 876 (82.9%) responses were collected from the initial 1,207 respondents, which were used for the final analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nSPTS was directly and positively related to work engagement, organisational commitment, distributive justice and procedural justice. In learning organisations, SPTS was positively but indirectly related to work engagement and organisational commitment, mediated by distributive justice. In non-learning organisations, SPTS was positively but indirectly related to work engagement and organisational commitment, mediated by procedural justice.\n\n\nPractical implications\nGiven SPTS’s positive impact on employee outcomes, to eliminate the information asymmetry between organisations and talent due to strategic ambiguity, organisations should increase SPTS by helping talents perceive the plethora of development opportunities in the talent pool.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe results demonstrate the utility of SPTS for improving employee outcomes based on strategic talent management (TM) mechanisms including talent rewards, talent development opportunities and promotions. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that distributive justice plays an important role in the build-based TM context of learning organisations.\n","PeriodicalId":365387,"journal":{"name":"The Learning Organization","volume":"8 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Learning Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-05-2023-0089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the relationship between self-perceived talent status (SPTS) and positive employee outcomes (work engagement and organisational commitment), mediated by organisational justice (distributive and procedural justice). The authors define SPTS as employees’ self-conceptualisation of talent, formed by inferring the organisation’s initiatives regarding training and development opportunities and through informal recognition by others. Design/methodology/approach The authors measured SPTS using eight items on a five-point scale. Through an internet survey company, the authors initially surveyed 1,207 full-time employees from 300 Japanese companies with ≥ 300 employees. In the second round of the survey, conducted after approximately two weeks, 876 (82.9%) responses were collected from the initial 1,207 respondents, which were used for the final analysis. Findings SPTS was directly and positively related to work engagement, organisational commitment, distributive justice and procedural justice. In learning organisations, SPTS was positively but indirectly related to work engagement and organisational commitment, mediated by distributive justice. In non-learning organisations, SPTS was positively but indirectly related to work engagement and organisational commitment, mediated by procedural justice. Practical implications Given SPTS’s positive impact on employee outcomes, to eliminate the information asymmetry between organisations and talent due to strategic ambiguity, organisations should increase SPTS by helping talents perceive the plethora of development opportunities in the talent pool. Originality/value The results demonstrate the utility of SPTS for improving employee outcomes based on strategic talent management (TM) mechanisms including talent rewards, talent development opportunities and promotions. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that distributive justice plays an important role in the build-based TM context of learning organisations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我认知的人才状况与员工成果:日本学习型组织中组织公正的作用
目的本研究旨在探讨自我认知的人才状况(SPTS)与员工积极成果(工作投入度和组织承诺)之间的关系,并以组织公正(分配公正和程序公正)为中介。作者将 SPTS 定义为员工对才能的自我认知,这种认知是通过推断组织在培训和发展机会方面的举措以及他人的非正式认可形成的。通过一家互联网调查公司,作者最初对来自 300 家员工人数≥ 300 人的日本公司的 1207 名全职员工进行了调查。在大约两周后进行的第二轮调查中,从最初的 1207 名受访者中收集到了 876 份(82.9%)回复,这些回复被用于最终分析。研究结果SPTS 与工作投入、组织承诺、分配公正和程序公正直接正相关。在学习型组织中,SPTS 与工作投入和组织承诺呈正相关,但与分配公正间接相关。实践意义鉴于SPTS对员工绩效的积极影响,为消除战略模糊性导致的组织与人才之间的信息不对称,组织应通过帮助人才感知人才库中大量的发展机会来提高SPTS。 原创性/价值研究结果表明,基于战略人才管理(TM)机制(包括人才奖励、人才发展机会和晋升),SPTS对改善员工绩效非常有用。此外,研究结果还表明,分配公正在学习型组织基于建设的人才管理背景下发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How digital applications can facilitate knowledge sharing in health care Navigating the gig economy in Romania: unveiling perceptions of working on on-demand platforms Support and connect employees to facilitate learning Responsible learning organizations: a framework to embed responsible innovation within organizations An egalitarian talent selection model to support learning organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1