Understanding Public Support for Policies Aimed at Gender Parity in Politics: A Cross-National Experimental Study

Andrea Carson, Timothy B. Gravelle, Lía Acosta Rueda, Leah Ruppanner
{"title":"Understanding Public Support for Policies Aimed at Gender Parity in Politics: A Cross-National Experimental Study","authors":"Andrea Carson, Timothy B. Gravelle, Lía Acosta Rueda, Leah Ruppanner","doi":"10.1017/s0008423923000720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Across the globe, women are underrepresented in elected politics. The study's case countries of Australia (ranked 33), Canada (61) and the United States (66) rank poorly for women's political representation. Drawing on role strain and gender-mainstreaming theories and applying large-scale survey experiments, we examine public opinion on non-quota mechanisms to bolster women's political participation. The experimental design manipulates the politician's gender and level of government (federal/local) before asking about non-quota supports to help the politician. We find public support for policies aimed at lessening work–family role strain is higher for a woman politician; these include a pay raise, childcare subsidies and housework allowances. This support is amplified among women who are presented with a woman politician in our experiment, providing evidence of a gender-affinity effect. The study's findings contribute to scholarship on gender equality and point to gender-mainstreaming mechanisms to help mitigate the gender gap in politics.","PeriodicalId":9491,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","volume":"92 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423923000720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Across the globe, women are underrepresented in elected politics. The study's case countries of Australia (ranked 33), Canada (61) and the United States (66) rank poorly for women's political representation. Drawing on role strain and gender-mainstreaming theories and applying large-scale survey experiments, we examine public opinion on non-quota mechanisms to bolster women's political participation. The experimental design manipulates the politician's gender and level of government (federal/local) before asking about non-quota supports to help the politician. We find public support for policies aimed at lessening work–family role strain is higher for a woman politician; these include a pay raise, childcare subsidies and housework allowances. This support is amplified among women who are presented with a woman politician in our experiment, providing evidence of a gender-affinity effect. The study's findings contribute to scholarship on gender equality and point to gender-mainstreaming mechanisms to help mitigate the gender gap in politics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解公众对政治中性别均等政策的支持:一项跨国实验研究
在全球范围内,妇女在民选政治中的代表性不足。本研究的案例国家澳大利亚(排名 33)、加拿大(61)和美国(66)在女性政治代表方面排名靠后。我们借鉴了角色压力和性别主流化理论,并运用大规模调查实验,研究了公众对非配额机制的看法,以促进女性参政。实验设计先操纵政治家的性别和政府级别(联邦/地方),然后再询问对政治家的非配额支持。我们发现,公众对旨在减轻女性政治家工作和家庭角色压力的政策的支持率较高;这些政策包括加薪、育儿补贴和家务补贴。在我们的实验中,当女性政治家出现时,这种支持会被放大,从而提供了性别亲和效应的证据。本研究的发现有助于促进性别平等,并指出了性别主流化机制,以帮助缩小政治领域的性别差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond Rights: The Nisga'a Final Agreement and the Challenges of Modern Treaty Relationships Carole Blackburn, Vancouver: UBC Press, 2021, pp. 184 Categorical Inequalities and Canadian Attitudes toward Positive and Negative Rights Marx on Leisure: An Aristotelian Interpretation Democracy and Exclusion Patti Tamara Lenard, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023, pp. 232 Toward A (Not The) Political Philosophy Of Populism: Democracy, Moral Dualism And Minimalst Theory In Christopher Lasch
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1