Numerical analysis of the geophysical parameter sensitivity on the multimode love wave dispersion curves

IF 1.1 Q3 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Physics Communications Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1088/2399-6528/ad1f71
La Hamimu La Hamimu, E. Cahyono, Herdi Budiman, S. R. Haraty, Natalis Ransi
{"title":"Numerical analysis of the geophysical parameter sensitivity on the multimode love wave dispersion curves","authors":"La Hamimu La Hamimu, E. Cahyono, Herdi Budiman, S. R. Haraty, Natalis Ransi","doi":"10.1088/2399-6528/ad1f71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The characteristics of multimode Love wave dispersion curves are dependent on various geophysical parameters, namely shear wave velocity (SWV), layer thickness and density. This paper presents a novel numerical analysis of these parameters to determine which ones have a significant effect on the dispersion curves of multimode Love waves. Identifying parameter sensitivity is a crucial step in the inversion procedure of geophysical modeling. Our numerical analysis focuses on perturbing three geophysical parameters that influence the dispersion curves. The results confirm that SWV parameter is the most sensitive. By employing the same perturbation procedure, our numerical analysis reveals that the SWV parameter has a highly significant impact on the multimode Love wave dispersion curves. The average relative error (RE) values are found to be 27.33% for alpha=-0.2 and 25.51% for alpha=+0.2. Conversely, perturbing the layer thickness parameter demonstrates no significant influence on the dispersion curves, resulting in average RE values of 5.69% for alpha=-0.2 and 7.96% for alpha=+0.2. Furthermore, the perturbation of the density parameter exhibits an extremely negligible impact on the multimode Love wave dispersion curves, with average RE values on the order of 10^(−14)%.","PeriodicalId":47089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physics Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physics Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-6528/ad1f71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The characteristics of multimode Love wave dispersion curves are dependent on various geophysical parameters, namely shear wave velocity (SWV), layer thickness and density. This paper presents a novel numerical analysis of these parameters to determine which ones have a significant effect on the dispersion curves of multimode Love waves. Identifying parameter sensitivity is a crucial step in the inversion procedure of geophysical modeling. Our numerical analysis focuses on perturbing three geophysical parameters that influence the dispersion curves. The results confirm that SWV parameter is the most sensitive. By employing the same perturbation procedure, our numerical analysis reveals that the SWV parameter has a highly significant impact on the multimode Love wave dispersion curves. The average relative error (RE) values are found to be 27.33% for alpha=-0.2 and 25.51% for alpha=+0.2. Conversely, perturbing the layer thickness parameter demonstrates no significant influence on the dispersion curves, resulting in average RE values of 5.69% for alpha=-0.2 and 7.96% for alpha=+0.2. Furthermore, the perturbation of the density parameter exhibits an extremely negligible impact on the multimode Love wave dispersion curves, with average RE values on the order of 10^(−14)%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多模爱波频散曲线的地球物理参数敏感性数值分析
多模爱波频散曲线的特征取决于各种地球物理参数,即剪切波速度(SWV)、层厚度和密度。本文对这些参数进行了新颖的数值分析,以确定哪些参数对多模洛夫波频散曲线有显著影响。确定参数敏感性是地球物理建模反演过程中的关键步骤。我们的数值分析侧重于扰动影响频散曲线的三个地球物理参数。结果证实,SWV 参数最为敏感。通过采用相同的扰动程序,我们的数值分析表明,SWV 参数对多模爱波频散曲线的影响非常显著。平均相对误差 (RE) 值在α=-0.2 时为 27.33%,在α=+0.2 时为 25.51%。相反,扰动层厚度参数对频散曲线没有明显影响,平均相对误差(RE)值在 alpha=-0.2 时为 5.69%,在 alpha=+0.2 时为 7.96%。此外,密度参数的扰动对多模爱波频散曲线的影响微乎其微,平均 RE 值约为 10^(-14)%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physics Communications
Journal of Physics Communications PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Deriving measurement collapse using zeta function regularisation and speculative measurement theory Zinc oxide behavior in CO detection as a function of thermal treatment time Teleportation of a qubit using quasi-Bell states The n-shot classical capacity of the quantum erasure channel Anisotropic effects in the nondipole relativistic photoionization of hydrogen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1