Feasibility and Acceptability of an Agenda-Setting Kit in the Care of People With Type 2 Diabetes: The QBSAFE ASK Feasibility Study

Shanzay Haider, Carolina Gonzalez-Lopez, Jennifer Clark, Derek L. Gravholt, M. Breslin, K. Boehmer, Sandra A. Hartasanchez, Brianna B. Sanchez, Victor M. Montori, K. Lipska
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of an Agenda-Setting Kit in the Care of People With Type 2 Diabetes: The QBSAFE ASK Feasibility Study","authors":"Shanzay Haider, Carolina Gonzalez-Lopez, Jennifer Clark, Derek L. Gravholt, M. Breslin, K. Boehmer, Sandra A. Hartasanchez, Brianna B. Sanchez, Victor M. Montori, K. Lipska","doi":"10.2337/cd23-0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports on a study to assess the feasibility of research procedures and acceptability of QBSAFE, a set of conversation cards focused on quality of life, treatment burden, safety, and avoidance of future events in people with type 2 diabetes. The study enrolled 84 patients and 7 clinicians. Of the 58 patients who completed questionnaires, 64% agreed that the QBSAFE ASK helped them discuss their situation, 78% agreed that others could benefit from it, and 38% said they would use it again. Most clinicians felt confident responding to issues (in 89% of encounters) and said they would use the kit again (78%) and recommend it to colleagues (82%). The QBSAFE agenda setting kit can be feasibly implemented and holds promise in facilitating discussion and collaborative problem-solving.","PeriodicalId":504780,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Diabetes","volume":" 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-0062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reports on a study to assess the feasibility of research procedures and acceptability of QBSAFE, a set of conversation cards focused on quality of life, treatment burden, safety, and avoidance of future events in people with type 2 diabetes. The study enrolled 84 patients and 7 clinicians. Of the 58 patients who completed questionnaires, 64% agreed that the QBSAFE ASK helped them discuss their situation, 78% agreed that others could benefit from it, and 38% said they would use it again. Most clinicians felt confident responding to issues (in 89% of encounters) and said they would use the kit again (78%) and recommend it to colleagues (82%). The QBSAFE agenda setting kit can be feasibly implemented and holds promise in facilitating discussion and collaborative problem-solving.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
议程设置工具包在 2 型糖尿病患者护理中的可行性和可接受性:QBSAFE ASK 可行性研究
QBSAFE 是一套谈话卡,重点关注 2 型糖尿病患者的生活质量、治疗负担、安全性以及避免未来事件的发生。这项研究共招募了 84 名患者和 7 名临床医生。在完成问卷调查的 58 名患者中,64% 的人认为 QBSAFE ASK 有助于他们讨论自己的情况,78% 的人认为其他人也能从中受益,38% 的人表示会再次使用。大多数临床医生在应对问题时感到自信(89% 的案例),并表示他们会再次使用该工具包(78%)和向同事推荐(82%)。QBSAFE 议程设置工具包是可行的,并有望促进讨论和合作解决问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Dexcom Community Glucose Monitoring Project: Six-Month Results Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetes Erratum: 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024 Abridged for Primary Care Professionals. Clin Diabetes 2024;42:222 (doi: 10.2337/cd24-a016) Insulin Icodec A1C: Episode 3 Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Participating in Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Services From Multiple Perspectives: Results of a Mixed-Methods Study of Medicaid Members, Medicaid Managed Care Organizations, and Providers in New York State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1