Pawns of Empire: Unraveling the Role of Dashnaktsutyun in British Geopolitical Strategy (1890-1922)

H. Avci
{"title":"Pawns of Empire: Unraveling the Role of Dashnaktsutyun in British Geopolitical Strategy (1890-1922)","authors":"H. Avci","doi":"10.52096/usbd.8.33.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the instrumental role of Dashnaktsutyun, also known as the Armenian Revolutionary Federation, in the geopolitical strategies of the British Empire during the early 20th century. Initially emerging as a nationalist movement within the Ottoman Empire, Dashnaktsutyun was co-opted by external powers, particularly Britain, to serve broader imperial interests in the Eurasian region. The study delves into the organization’s activities in the Ottoman, Russian, and Iranian territories, highlighting how its operations, under the guise of Armenian nationalism, were significantly influenced by British geopolitical objectives. The paper also explores the complex interplay between nationalist movements and international power politics, particularly in the context of the Great Game between the British and Russian Empires. A critical analysis of Dashnaktsutyun’s role during key historical events, such as the Soviet invasion of Armenia in 1920, reveals a prioritization of foreign directives over national resistance, impacting the trajectory of Armenian history and reflecting the broader dynamics of early 20th-century imperialism. This study serves as a cautionary tale of how nationalist movements can be redirected by external influences, often at the expense of their foundational principles and the welfare of their people. Keywords: Dashnaktsutyun, Armenian Revolutionary Federation, British Geopolitical Strategy, Armenian Nationalism, Imperialism, Soviet Invasion of Armenia, Great Game, Pan-Islamism, Pan-Turanism","PeriodicalId":506660,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Sciences","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52096/usbd.8.33.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the instrumental role of Dashnaktsutyun, also known as the Armenian Revolutionary Federation, in the geopolitical strategies of the British Empire during the early 20th century. Initially emerging as a nationalist movement within the Ottoman Empire, Dashnaktsutyun was co-opted by external powers, particularly Britain, to serve broader imperial interests in the Eurasian region. The study delves into the organization’s activities in the Ottoman, Russian, and Iranian territories, highlighting how its operations, under the guise of Armenian nationalism, were significantly influenced by British geopolitical objectives. The paper also explores the complex interplay between nationalist movements and international power politics, particularly in the context of the Great Game between the British and Russian Empires. A critical analysis of Dashnaktsutyun’s role during key historical events, such as the Soviet invasion of Armenia in 1920, reveals a prioritization of foreign directives over national resistance, impacting the trajectory of Armenian history and reflecting the broader dynamics of early 20th-century imperialism. This study serves as a cautionary tale of how nationalist movements can be redirected by external influences, often at the expense of their foundational principles and the welfare of their people. Keywords: Dashnaktsutyun, Armenian Revolutionary Federation, British Geopolitical Strategy, Armenian Nationalism, Imperialism, Soviet Invasion of Armenia, Great Game, Pan-Islamism, Pan-Turanism
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帝国之卒:揭示达什纳克楚昂在英国地缘政治战略中的作用(1890-1922 年)
本文探讨了 Dashnaktsutyun(又称亚美尼亚革命联合会)在 20 世纪初大英帝国地缘政治战略中的重要作用。Dashnaktsutyun 最初是奥斯曼帝国内部的一个民族主义运动,后被外部势力(尤其是英国)收编,以服务于欧亚地区更广泛的帝国利益。本研究深入探讨了该组织在奥斯曼帝国、俄罗斯和伊朗领土上的活动,强调了其在亚美尼亚民族主义幌子下的行动如何受到英国地缘政治目标的重大影响。论文还探讨了民族主义运动与国际强权政治之间复杂的相互作用,尤其是在大英帝国与俄罗斯帝国之间的大博弈背景下。对 Dashnaktsutyun 在关键历史事件(如 1920 年苏联入侵亚美尼亚)中所扮演角色的批判性分析表明,外国指令优先于民族抵抗,这影响了亚美尼亚的历史轨迹,也反映了 20 世纪早期帝国主义的广泛动态。这项研究警示人们,民族主义运动可能会受到外部影响而改变方向,这往往是以牺牲其基本原则和人民福祉为代价的。关键词亚美尼亚革命联盟、英国地缘政治战略、亚美尼亚民族主义、帝国主义、苏联入侵亚美尼亚、大博弈、泛伊斯兰主义、泛突厥主义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Almanya’da Çok Kültürlü Ortamda Yetişen Türk Kökenli Çocukların Türkçe Yayınlanan Yazılı ve Görsel Medyaya İlgisi Evde Bakım Desteğinden Faydalanan Ailelerde Bakım Yükü influence of work motivation on employee performance after mutation at PT PLN (PERSERO) UIK SBS Social Responsibility and Sustainability: The Changing Mission of Higher Education Kültürel Semboller ve Halkla ilişkiler: Yerel ve Küresel Yaklaşımlar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1