Equal in East and West? Regional anti-gender discourses and heterogeneity of the European Commission’s discursive protection of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans* and intersex rights

Puck Overhaart, R. van der Veer
{"title":"Equal in East and West? Regional anti-gender discourses and heterogeneity of the European Commission’s discursive protection of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans* and intersex rights","authors":"Puck Overhaart, R. van der Veer","doi":"10.1332/25151088y2023d000000018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research shows that lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans* and intersex (LGBTI) rights have become a core value of the European Union. Concurrently, hostility towards LGBTI rights is increasing across the European Union, including through anti-gender mobilisations, which reject ‘gender ideology’. This study employs sequential discourse analyses to discover: (1) the regional specificities in anti-gender discourse; and (2) whether the European Commission is discursively responsive to these differences. We find that the European Commission adapts its LGBTI discourse to actual and expected regional specificities, both in the issues discussed and in the frames employed. These conclusions are relevant because they show that European Union discourse on LGBTI rights is not homogeneous and may be strategically adapted to regional contexts, which has implications for the purported universal protection of LGBTI rights in the European Union. Additionally, these findings shed light on the important but neglected role that social mobilisations play in sensitising European Union actors to regional variation in political attitudes and values.","PeriodicalId":507922,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/25151088y2023d000000018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research shows that lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans* and intersex (LGBTI) rights have become a core value of the European Union. Concurrently, hostility towards LGBTI rights is increasing across the European Union, including through anti-gender mobilisations, which reject ‘gender ideology’. This study employs sequential discourse analyses to discover: (1) the regional specificities in anti-gender discourse; and (2) whether the European Commission is discursively responsive to these differences. We find that the European Commission adapts its LGBTI discourse to actual and expected regional specificities, both in the issues discussed and in the frames employed. These conclusions are relevant because they show that European Union discourse on LGBTI rights is not homogeneous and may be strategically adapted to regional contexts, which has implications for the purported universal protection of LGBTI rights in the European Union. Additionally, these findings shed light on the important but neglected role that social mobilisations play in sensitising European Union actors to regional variation in political attitudes and values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东西方平等?欧盟委员会对男女同性恋、双性恋、变性人和双性人权利的地区性反性别话语和异质性保护
最近的研究表明,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人和双性人(LGBTI)的权利已成为欧盟的核心价值观。与此同时,整个欧盟对 LGBTI 权利的敌意也在增加,包括通过反对 "性别意识形态 "的反性别动员。本研究采用序列话语分析来发现:(1) 反性别话语的地区特殊性;(2) 欧盟委员会是否在话语上对这些差异做出了回应。我们发现,无论是在讨论的问题上还是在使用的框架上,欧盟委员会都会根据实际和预期的地区特性调整其 LGBTI 话语。这些结论具有现实意义,因为它们表明欧盟关于 LGBTI 权利的论述并非千篇一律,可能会根据地区背景进行战略性调整,这对欧盟声称的普遍保护 LGBTI 权利产生了影响。此外,这些发现还揭示了社会动员在使欧盟行动者了解政治态度和价值观的地区差异方面所发挥的重要作用,但这一作用却被忽视了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reviewer Acknowledgements Political masculinities as an analytical category How are feminist policy frames challenged and resisted, and with what effects? Exploring the Scottish domestic abuse policy case A handmaid’s tale? Support for surrogacy reform: experimental evidence from Britain Gender and support for undemocratic politicians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1