Applying threat analysis approach in a small forest urban park (Northern Italy): local expert-based assessment to prioritize the management actions

Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2478/foecol-2024-0007
Pietro Giovacchini, Lorenzo Borghi, Davide Tartari, Francesca Cucci, Andrea Caldarelli, Massimo Tassinari, Pietro Melandri, Marco Dinetti, Corrado Battisti, Letizia Marsili
{"title":"Applying threat analysis approach in a small forest urban park (Northern Italy): local expert-based assessment to prioritize the management actions","authors":"Pietro Giovacchini, Lorenzo Borghi, Davide Tartari, Francesca Cucci, Andrea Caldarelli, Massimo Tassinari, Pietro Melandri, Marco Dinetti, Corrado Battisti, Letizia Marsili","doi":"10.2478/foecol-2024-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n To overcome the human-induced threats impacting on ecosystems, managers should focus on priorities. Here, we applied the expert-based Threat Analysis (TAN) in a forest urban park (Northern Italy), involving experts which ranked local threats, from the more to less impacting and following the IUCN classification. We also evaluated the level of knowledge of operators about these threats. Experts identified five priority target-specific threats: Roads and Railroads; Invasive-Non Native/Alien species; Other Ecosystem modifications; Recreational Activities, and Storms and Flooding. Storms and Flooding and Invasive-Non Native/Alien species appeared the threats with significant highest magnitude. Knowledge of threats is comparable without significant difference among them. However, Storms and Flooding and Roads and Railroads are the threats having both the highest level of knowledge by experts and the highest magnitude. At the opposite, Mowing was the less known threat regarding its regime and showed the lowest magnitude. TAN approach should be routinely used to build conceptual frameworks, ranking threats from the more to less impacting, therefore optimizing the management effort and developing local projects.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2024-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To overcome the human-induced threats impacting on ecosystems, managers should focus on priorities. Here, we applied the expert-based Threat Analysis (TAN) in a forest urban park (Northern Italy), involving experts which ranked local threats, from the more to less impacting and following the IUCN classification. We also evaluated the level of knowledge of operators about these threats. Experts identified five priority target-specific threats: Roads and Railroads; Invasive-Non Native/Alien species; Other Ecosystem modifications; Recreational Activities, and Storms and Flooding. Storms and Flooding and Invasive-Non Native/Alien species appeared the threats with significant highest magnitude. Knowledge of threats is comparable without significant difference among them. However, Storms and Flooding and Roads and Railroads are the threats having both the highest level of knowledge by experts and the highest magnitude. At the opposite, Mowing was the less known threat regarding its regime and showed the lowest magnitude. TAN approach should be routinely used to build conceptual frameworks, ranking threats from the more to less impacting, therefore optimizing the management effort and developing local projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
在一个小型森林城市公园(意大利北部)应用威胁分析方法:基于当地专家的评估,确定管理行动的优先次序
为了克服人为因素对生态系统造成的威胁,管理者应重点关注优先事项。在这里,我们在一个城市森林公园(意大利北部)采用了基于专家的威胁分析法(TAN),由专家按照世界自然保护联盟的分类,对当地的威胁从影响较大到影响较小进行排序。我们还评估了经营者对这些威胁的了解程度。专家们确定了五个优先目标的具体威胁:公路和铁路;入侵的非本地/外来物种;其他生态系统改变;娱乐活动以及暴风雨和洪水。暴风雨和洪水以及非本地/外来物种入侵是严重程度最高的威胁。对威胁的了解程度相当,没有明显差异。然而,暴风雨和洪水以及公路和铁路是专家了解程度最高、严重程度最高的威胁。与此相反,除草是对其制度了解较少的威胁,其影响程度也最低。应经常使用技术评估方法来建立概念框架,将威胁从影响较大到影响较小进行排序,从而优化管理工作并制定地方项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1