Preservation of Peritoneal Dialysis in Liver Surgery with Robotic Technique: A Case Report.

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Case Reports in Nephrology and Dialysis Pub Date : 2024-01-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000536139
Paolo Ria, Stefano Garritano, Vilma Martella, Antonio De Pascalis, Anna Zito, Marcello Napoli, Marcello Spampinato, Stefano D'Ugo
{"title":"Preservation of Peritoneal Dialysis in Liver Surgery with Robotic Technique: A Case Report.","authors":"Paolo Ria, Stefano Garritano, Vilma Martella, Antonio De Pascalis, Anna Zito, Marcello Napoli, Marcello Spampinato, Stefano D'Ugo","doi":"10.1159/000536139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the last year, the features of peritoneal dialysis patients have changed, and the cases in which there is a need to perform abdominal surgery are growing. Reports of abdominal surgery in patients who are able to continue peritoneal dialysis are increasing. The minimally invasive techniques represent the preferred and safest approach. Such techniques are associated with reduced hospitalization time, less invasiveness, peritoneal integrity preservation, and reduced intra-abdominal inflammation due to regenerative processes.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>In this case report, we present a case of major abdominal surgery, in the form of hepatic metastasectomy, performed with the robotic-assisted technique, which allowed catheter and intracorporeal dialysis preservation. The patient showed a strong determination to continue with peritoneal dialysis as long as possible. During the switch to hemodialysis, he performed prophylactic antibiotic therapy to preserve the peritoneal catheter, and the patient was instructed to have a reduced water intake, avoiding excessive ultrafiltration potentially deteriorating the residual renal function. Special care was also taken to avoid any nephrotoxic drug. The peritoneal treatment was restarted after 3 weeks with low volume exchange for the first 10 days, and the pre-surgery dialysis volumes were then re-established. After surgery, the patient showed adequate clearance of solutes and ultrafiltration similar to the preoperative period. The patient did not encounter any wound complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic surgery represents a further aid in peritoneal dialysis preservation after abdominal surgery. A detailed communication with the patient before performing this kind of procedure and a strong will to preserve the peritoneal method are essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":9599,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Nephrology and Dialysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10830135/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Nephrology and Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: During the last year, the features of peritoneal dialysis patients have changed, and the cases in which there is a need to perform abdominal surgery are growing. Reports of abdominal surgery in patients who are able to continue peritoneal dialysis are increasing. The minimally invasive techniques represent the preferred and safest approach. Such techniques are associated with reduced hospitalization time, less invasiveness, peritoneal integrity preservation, and reduced intra-abdominal inflammation due to regenerative processes.

Case presentation: In this case report, we present a case of major abdominal surgery, in the form of hepatic metastasectomy, performed with the robotic-assisted technique, which allowed catheter and intracorporeal dialysis preservation. The patient showed a strong determination to continue with peritoneal dialysis as long as possible. During the switch to hemodialysis, he performed prophylactic antibiotic therapy to preserve the peritoneal catheter, and the patient was instructed to have a reduced water intake, avoiding excessive ultrafiltration potentially deteriorating the residual renal function. Special care was also taken to avoid any nephrotoxic drug. The peritoneal treatment was restarted after 3 weeks with low volume exchange for the first 10 days, and the pre-surgery dialysis volumes were then re-established. After surgery, the patient showed adequate clearance of solutes and ultrafiltration similar to the preoperative period. The patient did not encounter any wound complications.

Conclusion: Robotic surgery represents a further aid in peritoneal dialysis preservation after abdominal surgery. A detailed communication with the patient before performing this kind of procedure and a strong will to preserve the peritoneal method are essential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器人技术在肝脏手术中保留腹膜透析:病例报告
导言:去年,腹膜透析患者的特征发生了变化,需要进行腹部手术的病例越来越多。能够继续腹膜透析的患者接受腹部手术的报告也越来越多。微创技术是最安全的首选方法。此类技术可缩短住院时间,减少创口,保持腹膜完整性,减少因再生过程引起的腹腔内炎症:在本病例报告中,我们介绍了一例采用机器人辅助技术进行肝转移切除术的腹部大手术,手术中保留了导管和体外透析。患者表现出强烈的决心,希望尽可能长时间地继续进行腹膜透析。在转为血液透析期间,他进行了预防性抗生素治疗以保留腹膜导管,并嘱咐患者减少水的摄入量,避免过度超滤导致残余肾功能恶化。还特别注意避免使用任何肾毒性药物。3 周后重新开始腹膜治疗,头 10 天采用低量交换,然后重新恢复手术前的透析量。术后,患者的溶质清除率和超滤量与术前相似。患者没有出现任何伤口并发症:结论:机器人手术为腹部手术后腹膜透析的保留提供了进一步的帮助。结论:机器人手术是腹部手术后保留腹膜透析的进一步辅助手段,在进行此类手术前与患者进行详细沟通,并具有保留腹膜透析方法的强烈意愿是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed online-only journal publishes original case reports covering the entire spectrum of nephrology and dialysis, including genetic susceptibility, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment or prevention, toxicities of therapy, critical care, supportive care, quality-of-life and survival issues. The journal will also accept case reports dealing with the use of novel technologies, both in the arena of diagnosis and treatment. Supplementary material is welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Successful Repeated Use of a Pathogen Adsorbing Biomimetic Device for the Adjunct Treatment of a SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection and Subsequent Infections with Different Multiresistant Bacteria. Recurrent Fibrillary Glomerulonephritis Secondary to Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Remission of Kidney Disease with Ibrutinib. Long-Term Observation of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis after Treatment of Renal Parenchymal Malakoplakia: A Case Report. JC Polyomavirus Nephropathy: A Rare Complication Late after Kidney Transplantation. First Successful Treatment of a Patient with a Primary Immune Complex-Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis with Iptacopan: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1