A critical comparison of aggressive intrusive thoughts in obsessive compulsive disorder and aggressive scripts in offender populations

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Aggression and Violent Behavior Pub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1016/j.avb.2024.101920
Stephanie Fernandez , Michael Daffern , Richard Moulding , Maja Nedeljkovic
{"title":"A critical comparison of aggressive intrusive thoughts in obsessive compulsive disorder and aggressive scripts in offender populations","authors":"Stephanie Fernandez ,&nbsp;Michael Daffern ,&nbsp;Richard Moulding ,&nbsp;Maja Nedeljkovic","doi":"10.1016/j.avb.2024.101920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Thoughts about harming another person are a common phenomenon and can be understood through two different constructs: aggressive intrusive thoughts and aggressive scripts. Aggressive intrusive thoughts are commonly investigated in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and aggressive scripts are reported by offender populations. The current review explores whether aggressive intrusive thoughts and aggressive scripts share similarities with regards to well established features from intrusive thought research, including frequency, intrusiveness, influence of maladaptive appraisals, associated emotional experiences, and thought control strategies. A targeted systematic review was deemed inappropriate due to the nature of the review and the lack of specific literature in the area. To inform this critical review, a literature search was conducted using relevant key words, and references from established research in the area were examined. Findings from this study identify that some features including frequency, distress, and thought control strategies are relevant to aggressive scripts.</p><p>Understanding the relationship these features have with aggressive scripts may prove beneficial for not only differentiating this construct from intrusive thoughts but for also informing risk assessment and intervention for those who experience them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51360,"journal":{"name":"Aggression and Violent Behavior","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101920"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178924000107/pdfft?md5=1f85a9873e212d8efb3b71b6e39aafea&pid=1-s2.0-S1359178924000107-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aggression and Violent Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178924000107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thoughts about harming another person are a common phenomenon and can be understood through two different constructs: aggressive intrusive thoughts and aggressive scripts. Aggressive intrusive thoughts are commonly investigated in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and aggressive scripts are reported by offender populations. The current review explores whether aggressive intrusive thoughts and aggressive scripts share similarities with regards to well established features from intrusive thought research, including frequency, intrusiveness, influence of maladaptive appraisals, associated emotional experiences, and thought control strategies. A targeted systematic review was deemed inappropriate due to the nature of the review and the lack of specific literature in the area. To inform this critical review, a literature search was conducted using relevant key words, and references from established research in the area were examined. Findings from this study identify that some features including frequency, distress, and thought control strategies are relevant to aggressive scripts.

Understanding the relationship these features have with aggressive scripts may prove beneficial for not only differentiating this construct from intrusive thoughts but for also informing risk assessment and intervention for those who experience them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强迫症患者攻击性侵入想法与罪犯攻击性脚本的重要比较
伤害他人的想法是一种普遍现象,可以通过两种不同的结构来理解:攻击性侵入想法和攻击性脚本。攻击性侵入想法通常是强迫症的研究对象,而攻击性脚本则是犯罪人群的报告。当前的综述探讨了攻击性侵入性想法和攻击性脚本在侵入性想法研究中已确立的特征(包括频率、侵入性、适应不良评价的影响、相关情绪体验和思维控制策略)方面是否有相似之处。由于综述的性质以及该领域具体文献的缺乏,有针对性的系统综述被认为是不合适的。为了给这一批判性综述提供信息,我们使用相关关键词进行了文献检索,并研究了该领域已有研究的参考文献。了解这些特征与攻击性脚本之间的关系不仅有助于区分攻击性脚本与侵入性想法,还有助于为风险评估和对攻击性脚本使用者的干预提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Aggression and Violent Behavior, A Review Journal is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes substantive and integrative reviews, as well as summary reports of innovative ongoing clinical research programs on a wide range of topics germane to the field of aggression and violent behavior. Papers encompass a large variety of issues, populations, and domains, including homicide (serial, spree, and mass murder: sexual homicide), sexual deviance and assault (rape, serial rape, child molestation, paraphilias), child and youth violence (firesetting, gang violence, juvenile sexual offending), family violence (child physical and sexual abuse, child neglect, incest, spouse and elder abuse), genetic predispositions, and the physiological basis of aggression.
期刊最新文献
The effects of hot spots policing on violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis The management of aggression in third wave behavioral therapies: A systematic review Hate/bias crime against racial/ethnic minorities in the United States: A systematic review of empirical research and assessment of next steps Longitudinal associations between peer victimisation subtypes and children and adolescents' anxiety: A meta-analysis Methods used to link crimes using behaviour: A literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1