Revisiting the blind mind: Still no evidence for sensory visual imagery in individuals with aphantasia

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Neuroscience Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neures.2024.01.008
Rebecca Keogh , Joel Pearson
{"title":"Revisiting the blind mind: Still no evidence for sensory visual imagery in individuals with aphantasia","authors":"Rebecca Keogh ,&nbsp;Joel Pearson","doi":"10.1016/j.neures.2024.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The inability to visualise was given the name aphantasia in 2015 by Zeman and colleagues. In 2018 we published research showing that fifteen individuals who self-identified as having aphantasia also demonstrated a lack of sensory visual imagery when undergoing the binocular rivalry imagery paradigm, suggesting more than just a metacognitive difference. Here we update these findings with over fifty participants with aphantasia and show that there is evidence for a lack of sensory imagery in aphantasia. How the binocular rivalry paradigm scores relate to the vividness of visual imagery questionnaire (VVIQ) and how aphantasia can be confirmed is discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19146,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Pages 27-30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168010224000129/pdfft?md5=0f158188339816334ee4b41da88ac42a&pid=1-s2.0-S0168010224000129-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168010224000129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The inability to visualise was given the name aphantasia in 2015 by Zeman and colleagues. In 2018 we published research showing that fifteen individuals who self-identified as having aphantasia also demonstrated a lack of sensory visual imagery when undergoing the binocular rivalry imagery paradigm, suggesting more than just a metacognitive difference. Here we update these findings with over fifty participants with aphantasia and show that there is evidence for a lack of sensory imagery in aphantasia. How the binocular rivalry paradigm scores relate to the vividness of visual imagery questionnaire (VVIQ) and how aphantasia can be confirmed is discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重温盲人思维:仍无证据表明幻觉症患者存在感官视觉意象。
2015年,泽曼及其同事将这种无法视觉化的现象命名为 "幻觉症"(aphantasia)。2018 年,我们发表的研究表明,15 名自我认定患有象觉失调症的人在接受双目对抗意象范式时也表现出缺乏感官视觉意象,这表明不仅仅是元认知上的差异。在此,我们通过五十多名患有象患的参与者更新了这些研究结果,并表明有证据表明象患患者缺乏感官意象。我们还讨论了双目对抗范式得分与视觉意象生动性问卷(VVIQ)之间的关系,以及如何确认象患。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience Research
Neuroscience Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: The international journal publishing original full-length research articles, short communications, technical notes, and reviews on all aspects of neuroscience Neuroscience Research is an international journal for high quality articles in all branches of neuroscience, from the molecular to the behavioral levels. The journal is published in collaboration with the Japan Neuroscience Society and is open to all contributors in the world.
期刊最新文献
LRP1-mediated p-tau propagation contributes to cognitive impairment after chronic neuropathic pain in rats. Stress and parental behaviors. Spatial dynamics of spontaneous activity in the developing and adult cortices. Detailed analysis of drift diffusion model parameters estimated for the ultimatum game. Cell type census in cerebral cortex reveals species-specific brain function and connectivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1