"Lesbian nation is Amazon culture: Lesbian separatism and the uses of Amazons".

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Journal of Lesbian Studies Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-04 DOI:10.1080/10894160.2024.2309057
Amy Pistone
{"title":"\"Lesbian nation is Amazon culture: Lesbian separatism and the uses of Amazons\".","authors":"Amy Pistone","doi":"10.1080/10894160.2024.2309057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, Amazon imagery serves as a case study for the complicated relationship of lesbian separatist movements of the 1970s and the classical Greek tradition. I consider how the use of mythological figures allowed lesbian feminists to rewrite and subvert dominant patriarchal narratives in ways that furthered their revolutionary projects. I argue that the nature of mythology is fundamentally fluid, collaborative, and open to queer reinterpretations and appropriations in ways that are rich with symbolic potential. Furthermore, the creation of separatist communities approximates an act of nation-building, and it is useful to consider other attempts to construct and theorize nations, ranging from Homi Bhabha on post-/anticolonial resistance to Berlant and Freeman on Queer Nationality. In particular, when considering a lesbian movement, we should remember that queer theory is messy because queerness itself is messy and resists boundaries and classification. Furthermore, what Ward frames as \"dyke methods\" (or dyke-centric queer methods) insist on categories that are fluid, messy, and shifting in their classifications and drawn toward as-yet-unknown queer possibilities. To study lesbian separatists with dyke methods is to embark on \"an antiessentialist and interdisciplinary project\" without necessarily \"making a commitment to balanced ideas\" (pp. 82-83). It is my hope that a messy, queer analysis of Amazonian symbolism in the construction of a lesbian nationalism will ultimately offer intriguing, if at times contradictory, possibilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lesbian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lesbian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2024.2309057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, Amazon imagery serves as a case study for the complicated relationship of lesbian separatist movements of the 1970s and the classical Greek tradition. I consider how the use of mythological figures allowed lesbian feminists to rewrite and subvert dominant patriarchal narratives in ways that furthered their revolutionary projects. I argue that the nature of mythology is fundamentally fluid, collaborative, and open to queer reinterpretations and appropriations in ways that are rich with symbolic potential. Furthermore, the creation of separatist communities approximates an act of nation-building, and it is useful to consider other attempts to construct and theorize nations, ranging from Homi Bhabha on post-/anticolonial resistance to Berlant and Freeman on Queer Nationality. In particular, when considering a lesbian movement, we should remember that queer theory is messy because queerness itself is messy and resists boundaries and classification. Furthermore, what Ward frames as "dyke methods" (or dyke-centric queer methods) insist on categories that are fluid, messy, and shifting in their classifications and drawn toward as-yet-unknown queer possibilities. To study lesbian separatists with dyke methods is to embark on "an antiessentialist and interdisciplinary project" without necessarily "making a commitment to balanced ideas" (pp. 82-83). It is my hope that a messy, queer analysis of Amazonian symbolism in the construction of a lesbian nationalism will ultimately offer intriguing, if at times contradictory, possibilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"女同性恋民族就是亚马逊文化:女同性恋分离主义与亚马逊人的用途"。
在这篇文章中,亚马逊意象作为一个案例研究了 20 世纪 70 年代女同性恋分离主义运动与古典希腊传统之间的复杂关系。我考虑了神话人物的使用是如何让女同性恋女权主义者改写和颠覆占主导地位的父权制叙事,从而推进她们的革命计划。我认为,神话的性质从根本上说是多变的、协作的、开放的,可以被同性恋者以富有象征潜力的方式重新诠释和挪用。此外,分离主义社区的创建近似于一种国家建设行为,考虑其他构建国家并将其理论化的尝试,从霍米-巴巴(Homi Bhabha)的后/大西洋殖民主义抵抗运动到贝兰特(Berlant)和弗里曼(Freeman)的同性恋民族性,都是有益的。特别是,在考虑女同性恋运动时,我们应该记住,同性恋理论是混乱的,因为同性恋本身就是混乱的,它抗拒界限和分类。此外,沃德所说的 "女同性恋者方法"(或以女同性恋者为中心的同性恋方法)所坚持的分类是流动的、混乱的、变化的,并指向尚未知晓的同性恋可能性。用女同性恋方法研究女同性恋分离主义者,是在不一定 "致力于平衡理念 "的情况下开展 "反本质主义和跨学科项目"(第 82-83 页)。我希望,在构建女同性恋民族主义的过程中,对亚马逊象征主义进行杂乱无章的同性恋分析,最终将提供耐人寻味的可能性,尽管有时是相互矛盾的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Lesbian Studies
Journal of Lesbian Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Lesbian Studies examines the cultural, historical, and interpersonal impact of the lesbian experience on society, keeping all readers—professional, academic, or general—informed and up to date on current findings, resources, and community concerns. Independent scholars, professors, students, and lay people will find this interdisciplinary journal essential on the topic of lesbian studies!
期刊最新文献
"Then you tell me you've fallen in love with a tree": Queer ecologies in Ali Smith's short stories. Pockets of tenderness: Lesbian earth in Alison Bechdel's Fun Home. A systematic review of the prevalence and associated factors of mental health conditions among lesbian, bisexual, and other sexual minority women in Southeast Asia. Environmental Eros: the films of Barbara Hammer as "Creative Geographies"1. A retrospective study of sexual minority women's gendered sexuality: Butch and femme sex at the turn of the 21st century.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1