Understanding Health Inequalities Research Capacities: Insights and Recommendations From Comparing Two High Income Settings.

0 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International journal of social determinants of health and health services Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-04 DOI:10.1177/27551938241230006
Lucinda Cash-Gibson, Joan Benach
{"title":"Understanding Health Inequalities Research Capacities: Insights and Recommendations From Comparing Two High Income Settings.","authors":"Lucinda Cash-Gibson, Joan Benach","doi":"10.1177/27551938241230006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Generating evidence on health inequalities (HI) is necessary to raise awareness of these issues, describe and monitor their evolution, analyze their causes, and inform interventions aiming to improve health equity. Yet not all cities and countries have the capacity to produce this type of research. Recent research provides new contextual and causal insights into this research production process, and in-depth understanding on why and how this type of research is produced in certain settings. This article aims to analyze two recent case studies that have uniquely explored this process in two high producers of HI research and high-income country settings to identify learning and distil recommendations, which may be insightful for other settings. Expanding and investing in this line of research is critical, particularly in places with lower HI research output and related capacity, in order to identify key contextual conditions and mechanisms that may enable or hinder this process. This new knowledge could guide the development of new HI research capacity strengthening strategies to foster this research in different settings, worldwide. More understanding is also needed on the relationship between HI research, policy, and action in order to tackle HI.</p>","PeriodicalId":73479,"journal":{"name":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","volume":" ","pages":"163-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938241230006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generating evidence on health inequalities (HI) is necessary to raise awareness of these issues, describe and monitor their evolution, analyze their causes, and inform interventions aiming to improve health equity. Yet not all cities and countries have the capacity to produce this type of research. Recent research provides new contextual and causal insights into this research production process, and in-depth understanding on why and how this type of research is produced in certain settings. This article aims to analyze two recent case studies that have uniquely explored this process in two high producers of HI research and high-income country settings to identify learning and distil recommendations, which may be insightful for other settings. Expanding and investing in this line of research is critical, particularly in places with lower HI research output and related capacity, in order to identify key contextual conditions and mechanisms that may enable or hinder this process. This new knowledge could guide the development of new HI research capacity strengthening strategies to foster this research in different settings, worldwide. More understanding is also needed on the relationship between HI research, policy, and action in order to tackle HI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解健康不平等问题的研究能力:比较两个高收入环境的启示和建议》。
为了提高人们对健康不平等(HI)问题的认识,描述和监测其演变情况,分析其原因,并为旨在改善健康公平的干预措施提供信息,有必要提供有关健康不平等的证据。然而,并非所有城市和国家都有能力开展此类研究。最近的研究为这一研究成果的产生过程提供了新的背景和因果关系见解,并深入揭示了为什么以及如何在特定环境下产生这类研究成果。本文旨在分析最近的两项案例研究,这两项案例研究在两个高收入国家的高人力资本指数研究中对这一过程进行了独特的探索,以确定学习内容并提炼出建议,这些建议可能对其他环境具有启发意义。扩大和投资于这一研究领域至关重要,尤其是在健康保险研究产出和相关能力较低的地方,以便确定可能促进或阻碍这一进程的关键背景条件和机制。这一新知识可以指导制定新的加强人类免疫缺损病毒研究能力的战略,以促进世界各地不同环境下的这一研究。还需要进一步了解人类免疫缺损病毒研究、政策和行动之间的关系,以解决人类免疫缺损病毒问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Mechanisms of Health Inequities, and the Political Economy of Health Care Services. Does Participating in New Rural Cooperative Medical Insurance Change Catastrophic Health Expenditure? Evidence from the China Household Income Project. The Locations of Palestine and the U.S. in the Global Map of Homelessness: Part 2. Demand and Supply Drivers of Medicare and Non-Medicare Health Spending: An Analysis of U.S. States, 1991-2019. Advancing Equity in Health Care Among Dalits and Tribal People in India: The Progress, Current Realities, and the Way Forward.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1