Risk Factors and Prognosis of Early Neurological Deterioration after Bridging Therapy.

Yiju Xie, Shengyu Li, Liuyu Liu, Shiting Tang, Yayuan Liu, Shuangquan Tan, Zhijian Liang
{"title":"Risk Factors and Prognosis of Early Neurological Deterioration after Bridging Therapy.","authors":"Yiju Xie, Shengyu Li, Liuyu Liu, Shiting Tang, Yayuan Liu, Shuangquan Tan, Zhijian Liang","doi":"10.2174/0115672026287986240104074006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early neurological deterioration (END) after bridging therapy (BT) of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients is associated with poor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to study the incidence, risk factors and prognosis of END after BT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January to December 2021, the clinical data of AIS patients treated by BT (intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase prior to mechanical thrombectomy) from three comprehensive stroke centers were analyzed. Patients were divided into non-END group and END group according to whether they developed END within 72 hours of symptom onset. Modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used to assess the patient's prognosis at 90 days, and favorable outcomes were defined as mRS≤2. The incidence of END was investigated, and binary logistic regression analysis was used to explore its associated factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of END after BT was 33.67%. The eligible 90 patients included 29 cases in the END group and 61 cases in the non-END group. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that increase of systolic blood pressure (SBP) (OR=1.026, 95%CI:1.001-1.051, p =0.043), higher level of blood glucose at admission (OR=1.389, 95%CI:1.092-1.176, p =0.007) and large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) subtype (OR=8.009, 95%CI:2.357-27.223, p =0.001) were independent risk factors of END. Compared with the non-END group, the END group had significantly lower rates of good outcomes (6.90% versus 65.57%, p =0.001) while higher rates of mortality (44.83% versus 4.92%, p =0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was found that the incidence of END after BT in AIS patients was 33.67%. An increase in SBP, higher glucose levels at admission, and LAA were independent risk factors of END that predicted a poor prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93965,"journal":{"name":"Current neurovascular research","volume":" ","pages":"25-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348451/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current neurovascular research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672026287986240104074006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early neurological deterioration (END) after bridging therapy (BT) of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients is associated with poor outcomes.

Objective: We aimed to study the incidence, risk factors and prognosis of END after BT.

Methods: From January to December 2021, the clinical data of AIS patients treated by BT (intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase prior to mechanical thrombectomy) from three comprehensive stroke centers were analyzed. Patients were divided into non-END group and END group according to whether they developed END within 72 hours of symptom onset. Modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used to assess the patient's prognosis at 90 days, and favorable outcomes were defined as mRS≤2. The incidence of END was investigated, and binary logistic regression analysis was used to explore its associated factors.

Results: The incidence of END after BT was 33.67%. The eligible 90 patients included 29 cases in the END group and 61 cases in the non-END group. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that increase of systolic blood pressure (SBP) (OR=1.026, 95%CI:1.001-1.051, p =0.043), higher level of blood glucose at admission (OR=1.389, 95%CI:1.092-1.176, p =0.007) and large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) subtype (OR=8.009, 95%CI:2.357-27.223, p =0.001) were independent risk factors of END. Compared with the non-END group, the END group had significantly lower rates of good outcomes (6.90% versus 65.57%, p =0.001) while higher rates of mortality (44.83% versus 4.92%, p =0.001).

Conclusion: It was found that the incidence of END after BT in AIS patients was 33.67%. An increase in SBP, higher glucose levels at admission, and LAA were independent risk factors of END that predicted a poor prognosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桥接疗法后早期神经功能恶化的风险因素和预后。
背景:急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者桥接治疗(BT)后的早期神经功能恶化(END)与不良预后有关:我们旨在研究 BT 后 END 的发生率、风险因素和预后:方法:分析了 2021 年 1 月至 12 月期间,三家综合卒中中心采用 BT(机械取栓前使用阿替普酶静脉溶栓)治疗 AIS 患者的临床数据。根据患者是否在症状出现后 72 小时内出现END,将其分为非END 组和END 组。采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评估患者90天后的预后,mRS≤2为预后良好。对END的发生率进行了调查,并采用二元逻辑回归分析探讨其相关因素:结果:BT术后END发生率为33.67%。符合条件的 90 例患者中,END 组 29 例,非END 组 61 例。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,收缩压(SBP)升高(OR=1.026,95%CI:1.001-1.051,P =0.043)、入院时血糖水平升高(OR=1.389,95%CI:1.092-1.176,P =0.007)和大动脉粥样硬化(LAA)亚型(OR=8.009,95%CI:2.357-27.223,P =0.001)是END的独立危险因素。与非END组相比,END组的良好预后率明显较低(6.90%对65.57%,P =0.001),而死亡率较高(44.83%对4.92%,P =0.001):结论:研究发现,AIS 患者 BT 后 END 的发生率为 33.67%。SBP升高、入院时血糖水平升高和LAA是END的独立危险因素,预示着不良预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Circadian Rhythm, Clock Genes, and Stroke. The Effect of Systemic Inflammatory Response on Mechanical Thrombectomy is Partly Mediated by Pre-thrombectomy Cerebral Edema in Acute Stroke Patients. Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery: An Overview of Developing the Blood Brain Barrier. Protective Effect of Aloe-emodin on Cognitive Function in Copper-loaded Rats Based on The Inhibition of Hippocampal Neuron Ferroptosis. Association of Alkaline Phosphatase Level with Futile Recanalization in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated with Endovascular Thrombectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1