Diagnostic Utility of Conners Continuous Performance Test-3 for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Attention Disorders Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1177/10870547231223727
P Douglas Callan, Stephanie Swanberg, Sarah K Weber, Kari Eidnes, Tara M Pope, Dustin Shepler
{"title":"Diagnostic Utility of Conners Continuous Performance Test-3 for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review.","authors":"P Douglas Callan, Stephanie Swanberg, Sarah K Weber, Kari Eidnes, Tara M Pope, Dustin Shepler","doi":"10.1177/10870547231223727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the literature on the utility of the Conners CPT-3 in persons with ADHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted. Six databases were searched using inclusion criteria: research studies, year 2000+, English, and ages 8+. Two raters independently screened 1,480 title/abstracts and subsequently reviewed 399 full texts. Data extraction and critical appraisal were conducted. Reflective thematic analysis through inductive coding identified qualitative themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria with five themes identified. Five studies found CPT-3 was a weak or poor predictor of ADHD diagnosis while two found it was an adequate predictor. Two studies found CPT-3 could differentiate clients with comorbid ADHD/anxiety from ADHD or ADHD from obsessive-compulsive disorder. One found CPT-3 could not differentiate ADHD from ASD or comorbid ADHD/ASD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results revealed CPT-3 as a standalone measure is a weak or poor predictor of ADHD. Multiple measures for evaluating persons with ADHD are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"992-1007"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Attention Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547231223727","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To review the literature on the utility of the Conners CPT-3 in persons with ADHD.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted. Six databases were searched using inclusion criteria: research studies, year 2000+, English, and ages 8+. Two raters independently screened 1,480 title/abstracts and subsequently reviewed 399 full texts. Data extraction and critical appraisal were conducted. Reflective thematic analysis through inductive coding identified qualitative themes.

Results: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria with five themes identified. Five studies found CPT-3 was a weak or poor predictor of ADHD diagnosis while two found it was an adequate predictor. Two studies found CPT-3 could differentiate clients with comorbid ADHD/anxiety from ADHD or ADHD from obsessive-compulsive disorder. One found CPT-3 could not differentiate ADHD from ASD or comorbid ADHD/ASD.

Conclusions: Results revealed CPT-3 as a standalone measure is a weak or poor predictor of ADHD. Multiple measures for evaluating persons with ADHD are recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康纳斯连续表现测试-3 对注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断效用:系统回顾
目的综述有关康纳斯 CPT-3 在多动症患者中的实用性的文献:方法:进行系统性回顾。检索了六个数据库,采用的纳入标准为:研究、2000 年以上、英语、8 岁以上。两名评审员独立筛选了 1,480 篇标题/摘要,随后审阅了 399 篇全文。进行了数据提取和批判性评估。通过归纳编码的反思性主题分析确定了定性主题:结果:13 项研究符合纳入标准,确定了 5 个主题。五项研究发现 CPT-3 对多动症诊断的预测能力较弱或较差,两项研究发现 CPT-3 对多动症诊断的预测能力较强。两项研究发现,CPT-3 可以将合并有多动症/焦虑症的患者与多动症或多动症与强迫症区分开来。一项研究发现,CPT-3 无法区分多动症与 ASD 或合并多动症/ASD:结果表明,CPT-3 作为一种独立的测量方法,对多动症的预测能力较弱或较差。建议采用多种测量方法对多动症患者进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Attention Disorders (JAD) focuses on basic and applied science concerning attention and related functions in children, adolescents, and adults. JAD publishes articles on diagnosis, comorbidity, neuropsychological functioning, psychopharmacology, and psychosocial issues. The journal also addresses practice, policy, and theory, as well as review articles, commentaries, in-depth analyses, empirical research articles, and case presentations or program evaluations.
期刊最新文献
Absence of Causal Relationship Between Levels of Unsaturated Fatty Acids and ADHD: Evidence From Mendelian Randomization Study. Risk of Periodontitis in Adolescents With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Cohort Study of 81,055 Participants. Perceptions of Academic Performance, Impairment, and Mental Health in University Students With and Without ADHD. ADHD in Black Youth: A Content Analysis of Empirical Research from 1972 to 2023. Unmet Needs of Children and Young Adults With ADHD: Insights From Key Stakeholders on Priorities for Stigma Reduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1