Teacher's social desirability bias and Migrant students: A study on explicit and implicit prejudices with a list experiment

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Social Science Research Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.102990
M. Constanza Ayala , Andrew Webb , Luis Maldonado , Andrea Canales , Eduardo Cascallar
{"title":"Teacher's social desirability bias and Migrant students: A study on explicit and implicit prejudices with a list experiment","authors":"M. Constanza Ayala ,&nbsp;Andrew Webb ,&nbsp;Luis Maldonado ,&nbsp;Andrea Canales ,&nbsp;Eduardo Cascallar","doi":"10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.102990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Scholarly research has consistently shown that teachers present negative assessments of and attitudes toward migrant students. However, previous studies have not clearly addressed the distinction between implicit and explicit prejudices, or identified their underlying sources. This study identifies the explicit and implicit prejudices held by elementary and middle school teachers regarding the learning abilities of an ethnic minority group: Haitian students within the Chilean educational system. We use a list experiment to assess how social desirability and intergroup attitudes toward minority students influence teachers' prejudices. The findings reveal that teachers harbor implicit prejudices towards Haitian students and are truthful in reporting their attitudes, thereby contradicting the desirability bias hypothesis. We suggest that teachers rely on stereotypes associated with the students' nationality when assessing Haitian students’ learning abilities. The implications of these results are discussed in relation to theories grounded in stereotypes and intergroup attitudes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48338,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Research","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102990"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X24000127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholarly research has consistently shown that teachers present negative assessments of and attitudes toward migrant students. However, previous studies have not clearly addressed the distinction between implicit and explicit prejudices, or identified their underlying sources. This study identifies the explicit and implicit prejudices held by elementary and middle school teachers regarding the learning abilities of an ethnic minority group: Haitian students within the Chilean educational system. We use a list experiment to assess how social desirability and intergroup attitudes toward minority students influence teachers' prejudices. The findings reveal that teachers harbor implicit prejudices towards Haitian students and are truthful in reporting their attitudes, thereby contradicting the desirability bias hypothesis. We suggest that teachers rely on stereotypes associated with the students' nationality when assessing Haitian students’ learning abilities. The implications of these results are discussed in relation to theories grounded in stereotypes and intergroup attitudes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师的社会可取性偏见与移民学生:通过列表实验研究显性和隐性偏见
学术研究一致表明,教师对移民学生的评价和态度是负面的。然而,以往的研究并没有明确指出内隐偏见和外显偏见的区别,也没有找出它们的根源。本研究确定了中小学教师对一个少数民族群体的学习能力所持有的显性和隐性偏见:海地学生。我们使用列表实验来评估社会可取性和群体间对少数民族学生的态度如何影响教师的偏见。研究结果表明,教师对海地学生持有隐性偏见,并如实报告自己的态度,从而与可取性偏见假说相矛盾。我们认为,教师在评价海地学生的学习能力时,依赖于与学生国籍相关的刻板印象。我们将结合刻板印象和群体间态度理论来讨论这些结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Social Science Research publishes papers devoted to quantitative social science research and methodology. The journal features articles that illustrate the use of quantitative methods in the empirical solution of substantive problems, and emphasizes those concerned with issues or methods that cut across traditional disciplinary lines. Special attention is given to methods that have been used by only one particular social science discipline, but that may have application to a broader range of areas.
期刊最新文献
Impact of layoffs on mortality and physical health in transitional China 1989–2015 Political and educational dynamics behind the Evangelicals’ stance against mask mandates during COVID-19 in the U.S. Social welfare expansion and political support during economic slowdown: A panel data analysis of China, 2010–2018 Punishing “gender deviants”? Women born in the year of the white horse and college selectivity The effects of world society on international poverty, 1990–2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1