Potential clinical significance of ALDH3B1 in auxiliary diagnosis of gastric cancer.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biomarkers in medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-09 DOI:10.2217/bmm-2023-0418
Chenxue Tang, Jing Xu, Ming Zheng, Dongchen Qian, Zhihua Gao, Xian Li, Weiwei Zhang
{"title":"Potential clinical significance of ALDH3B1 in auxiliary diagnosis of gastric cancer.","authors":"Chenxue Tang, Jing Xu, Ming Zheng, Dongchen Qian, Zhihua Gao, Xian Li, Weiwei Zhang","doi":"10.2217/bmm-2023-0418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This research aimed to explore a diagnostic method based on serum <i>ALDH3B1</i> and to evaluate the clinical diagnostic efficacy in gastric cancer (GC) by comparing it with the traditional GC diagnostic method, the carcinoembryonic protein (CEA) assay. <b>Methods:</b> Serum samples were collected from 70 healthy volunteers and various patients (GC: 76, benign gastric lesions: 20, postoperative: 37, recurrence: 56). The diagnostic efficacy of serum <i>ALDH3B1</i>, CEA and the co-diagnosis were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve. ALDH3B1 protein levels were evaluated by western blot. <b>Results:</b> The co-diagnosis of <i>ALDH3B1</i> and CEA had the highest diagnostic efficacy (area under the curve = 0.841). <b>Conclusion:</b> Serum <i>ALDH3B1</i> may be used as an auxiliary diagnostic biomarker for GC, and its co-diagnosis with CEA can improve diagnostic efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9182,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/bmm-2023-0418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This research aimed to explore a diagnostic method based on serum ALDH3B1 and to evaluate the clinical diagnostic efficacy in gastric cancer (GC) by comparing it with the traditional GC diagnostic method, the carcinoembryonic protein (CEA) assay. Methods: Serum samples were collected from 70 healthy volunteers and various patients (GC: 76, benign gastric lesions: 20, postoperative: 37, recurrence: 56). The diagnostic efficacy of serum ALDH3B1, CEA and the co-diagnosis were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve. ALDH3B1 protein levels were evaluated by western blot. Results: The co-diagnosis of ALDH3B1 and CEA had the highest diagnostic efficacy (area under the curve = 0.841). Conclusion: Serum ALDH3B1 may be used as an auxiliary diagnostic biomarker for GC, and its co-diagnosis with CEA can improve diagnostic efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ALDH3B1 在胃癌辅助诊断中的潜在临床意义
研究目的本研究旨在探索一种基于血清 ALDH3B1 的诊断方法,并将其与传统的胃癌诊断方法--癌胚抗原(CEA)检测进行比较,评估其对胃癌(GC)的临床诊断效果。研究方法收集了 70 名健康志愿者和不同患者(GC:76 人;胃良性病变:20 人;术后:37 人;复发:56 人)的血清样本。通过接收器操作特征曲线评估血清 ALDH3B1、CEA 和联合诊断的诊断效果。ALDH3B1 蛋白水平通过 Western 印迹进行评估。结果ALDH3B1和CEA联合诊断的诊断率最高(曲线下面积=0.841)。结论血清 ALDH3B1 可作为 GC 的辅助诊断生物标志物,与 CEA 联合诊断可提高诊断效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomarkers in medicine
Biomarkers in medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomarkers are physical, functional or biochemical indicators of physiological or disease processes. These key indicators can provide vital information in determining disease prognosis, in predicting of response to therapies, adverse events and drug interactions, and in establishing baseline risk. The explosion of interest in biomarker research is driving the development of new predictive, diagnostic and prognostic products in modern medical practice, and biomarkers are also playing an increasingly important role in the discovery and development of new drugs. For the full utility of biomarkers to be realized, we require greater understanding of disease mechanisms, and the interplay between disease mechanisms, therapeutic interventions and the proposed biomarkers. However, in attempting to evaluate the pros and cons of biomarkers systematically, we are moving into new, challenging territory. Biomarkers in Medicine (ISSN 1752-0363) is a peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal delivering commentary and analysis on the advances in our understanding of biomarkers and their potential and actual applications in medicine. The journal facilitates translation of our research knowledge into the clinic to increase the effectiveness of medical practice. As the scientific rationale and regulatory acceptance for biomarkers in medicine and in drug development become more fully established, Biomarkers in Medicine provides the platform for all players in this increasingly vital area to communicate and debate all issues relating to the potential utility and applications. Each issue includes a diversity of content to provide rounded coverage for the research professional. Articles include Guest Editorials, Interviews, Reviews, Research Articles, Perspectives, Priority Paper Evaluations, Special Reports, Case Reports, Conference Reports and Company Profiles. Review coverage is divided into themed sections according to area of therapeutic utility with some issues including themed sections on an area of topical interest. Biomarkers in Medicine provides a platform for commentary and debate for all professionals with an interest in the identification of biomarkers, elucidation of their role and formalization and approval of their application in modern medicine. The audience for Biomarkers in Medicine includes academic and industrial researchers, clinicians, pathologists, clinical chemists and regulatory professionals.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of AT in acute pulmonary embolism with pleural effusion. TMEM35B as a novel biomarker for diagnosing gliomas. N-glycan as new potential biomarker for predicting treatment response in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The predictive value of CK-MB on the curative effect of urokinase combined with LMWH calcium in AMI. Immune nutrition indices are associated with disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1