Whose Anthropocene?: a data-driven look at the prospects for collaboration between natural science, social science, and the humanities

IF 0.7 3区 文学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Digital Scholarship in the Humanities Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1093/llc/fqae004
Carlos Santana, Kathryn Petrozzo, T J Perkins
{"title":"Whose Anthropocene?: a data-driven look at the prospects for collaboration between natural science, social science, and the humanities","authors":"Carlos Santana, Kathryn Petrozzo, T J Perkins","doi":"10.1093/llc/fqae004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the idea of the Anthropocene originated in the earth sciences, there have been increasing calls for questions about the Anthropocene to be addressed by pan-disciplinary groups of researchers from across the natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities. We use data analysis techniques from corpus linguistics to examine academic texts about the Anthropocene from these disciplinary families. We read the data to suggest that barriers to a broadly interdisciplinary study of the Anthropocene are high, but we are also able to identify some areas of common ground that could serve as interdisciplinary bridges.","PeriodicalId":45315,"journal":{"name":"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqae004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the idea of the Anthropocene originated in the earth sciences, there have been increasing calls for questions about the Anthropocene to be addressed by pan-disciplinary groups of researchers from across the natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities. We use data analysis techniques from corpus linguistics to examine academic texts about the Anthropocene from these disciplinary families. We read the data to suggest that barriers to a broadly interdisciplinary study of the Anthropocene are high, but we are also able to identify some areas of common ground that could serve as interdisciplinary bridges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁的人类世:以数据为导向审视自然科学、社会科学和人文学科之间的合作前景
尽管 "人类世 "的概念起源于地球科学,但越来越多的人呼吁由来自自然科学、社会科学和人文科学的泛学科研究小组来解决有关 "人类世 "的问题。我们使用语料库语言学的数据分析技术来研究这些学科中有关 "人类世 "的学术文本。我们读取的数据表明,对人类世进行广泛的跨学科研究障碍重重,但我们也能够找出一些共同点,作为跨学科的桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: DSH or Digital Scholarship in the Humanities is an international, peer reviewed journal which publishes original contributions on all aspects of digital scholarship in the Humanities including, but not limited to, the field of what is currently called the Digital Humanities. Long and short papers report on theoretical, methodological, experimental, and applied research and include results of research projects, descriptions and evaluations of tools, techniques, and methodologies, and reports on work in progress. DSH also publishes reviews of books and resources. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities was previously known as Literary and Linguistic Computing.
期刊最新文献
Social network analysis of the Babylonian Talmud Ancient classical theatre from the digital humanities: a systematic review 2010–21 Language-based machine perception: linguistic perspectives on the compilation of captioning datasets Personality prediction via multi-task transformer architecture combined with image aesthetics Who wrote the first Constitutions of Freemasonry?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1