Examining learning opportunities and perceptions of Latin American ESL learners in varying proficiency-level groups

IF 1.5 3区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2024-02-04 DOI:10.1111/ijal.12538
Franciele Spinelli
{"title":"Examining learning opportunities and perceptions of Latin American ESL learners in varying proficiency-level groups","authors":"Franciele Spinelli","doi":"10.1111/ijal.12538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Learner-to-learner (peer) interaction has been integral to the second language (L2) classroom since the advent of communicative-oriented pedagogies. Despite the well-documented benefits of peer interaction, the extent to which learners benefit may be impacted by a range of factors, particularly their peers’ proficiency levels. Yet studies on the influence of peers’ proficiency have shown contradictory findings and are extensively focused on pairs rather than small groups. Furthermore, although low-proficiency (LP) learners experience greater impacts from interaction with peers of different proficiency levels, their interactional patterns and perspectives are underexplored. This study investigates how six Latin American learners of English (core learners) co-created learning opportunities as they interacted with non-core learners (<i>n</i> = 33) in three proficiency small-group interactions. A total of 18 group interactions were analysed for language-related episodes (LREs) and turn-takings. The results showed that core learners’ (CLs) LREs and turns diminished as their peers’ proficiency increased. However, fewer incorrect LRE resolutions were found when CLs were grouped with high-proficiency (HP) peers. The CLs also perceived the interaction with HP peers as challenging but important for their L2 development. Additionally, aside from the proficiency level, CLs acknowledged the importance of their peers’ positive attitudes for the success of their interactions. These findings provide important insights into employing mixed-proficiency groups to create more optimal learning conditions, particularly for LP learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":46851,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"34 3","pages":"884-904"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijal.12538","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learner-to-learner (peer) interaction has been integral to the second language (L2) classroom since the advent of communicative-oriented pedagogies. Despite the well-documented benefits of peer interaction, the extent to which learners benefit may be impacted by a range of factors, particularly their peers’ proficiency levels. Yet studies on the influence of peers’ proficiency have shown contradictory findings and are extensively focused on pairs rather than small groups. Furthermore, although low-proficiency (LP) learners experience greater impacts from interaction with peers of different proficiency levels, their interactional patterns and perspectives are underexplored. This study investigates how six Latin American learners of English (core learners) co-created learning opportunities as they interacted with non-core learners (n = 33) in three proficiency small-group interactions. A total of 18 group interactions were analysed for language-related episodes (LREs) and turn-takings. The results showed that core learners’ (CLs) LREs and turns diminished as their peers’ proficiency increased. However, fewer incorrect LRE resolutions were found when CLs were grouped with high-proficiency (HP) peers. The CLs also perceived the interaction with HP peers as challenging but important for their L2 development. Additionally, aside from the proficiency level, CLs acknowledged the importance of their peers’ positive attitudes for the success of their interactions. These findings provide important insights into employing mixed-proficiency groups to create more optimal learning conditions, particularly for LP learners.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考察不同水平小组中拉美 ESL 学习者的学习机会和看法
自以交际为导向的教学法问世以来,学习者之间的(同伴)互动一直是第二语言(L2)课堂不可或缺的一部分。尽管同伴互动的好处有目共睹,但学习者的受益程度可能会受到一系列因素的影响,尤其是同伴的水平。然而,有关同伴水平影响的研究却显示出相互矛盾的结果,而且这些研究主要集中在双人小组而不是小组。此外,尽管低能力(LP)学习者在与不同能力水平的同伴互动时受到的影响更大,但他们的互动模式和观点却未得到充分探讨。本研究调查了六名拉丁美洲英语学习者(核心学习者)如何在三种水平的小组互动中与非核心学习者(n = 33)共同创造学习机会。共对 18 次小组互动进行了语言相关事件(LRE)和轮流发言分析。结果显示,核心学习者(CLs)的语言相关事件(LREs)和轮流发言次数随着同伴水平的提高而减少。然而,当核心学习者与高水平(HP)同伴分组时,错误的 LRE 解题较少。语言学习者还认为,与高水平同伴的互动具有挑战性,但对他们的 L2 发展很重要。此外,除了能力水平之外,语言学习者还认识到同伴的积极态度对互动成功的重要性。这些发现为采用混合能力小组创造更理想的学习条件提供了重要的启示,尤其是对 LP 学习者而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Applied Linguistics (InJAL) publishes articles that explore the relationship between expertise in linguistics, broadly defined, and the everyday experience of language. Its scope is international in that it welcomes articles which show explicitly how local issues of language use or learning exemplify more global concerns.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The big global issues: Applied linguists and transdisciplinarity beyond SLA Influential sociocultural factors on teacher agency in times of educational change: Reflection from a Southeast Asian context Social presence and other individual differences in asynchronous English communication Unveiling the complexity of L2 learners’ emotions and emotion regulation: A retrodictive qualitative modeling study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1