An economic evaluation of community pharmacy dispensed naloxone in Canada

Ashley Cid, Nikita Mahajan, William W.L. Wong, Michael Beazely, K. Grindrod
{"title":"An economic evaluation of community pharmacy dispensed naloxone in Canada","authors":"Ashley Cid, Nikita Mahajan, William W.L. Wong, Michael Beazely, K. Grindrod","doi":"10.1177/17151635241228241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To determine the cost-effectiveness of pharmacy-based intranasal (IN) and intramuscular (IM) naloxone distribution in Canada. We developed a state-transition model for pharmacy-based naloxone distribution, every 3 years, to illicit, prescription, opioid-agonist therapy and nonopioid use populations compared to no naloxone distribution. We used a monthly cycle length, lifetime horizon and a Canadian provincial Ministry of Health perspective. Transition probabilities, cost and utility data were retrieved from the literature. Costs (2020) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were discounted 1.5% annually. Microsimulation, 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Distribution of naloxone to all Canadians compared to no distribution prevented 151 additional overdose deaths per 10,000 persons, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $50,984 per QALY for IM naloxone and an ICER of $126,060 per QALY for IN naloxone. Distribution of any naloxone to only illicit opioid users was the most cost-effective. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that survival rates for illicit opioid users were most influenced by the availability of either emergency medical services or naloxone. Distribution of IM and IN naloxone to all Canadians every 3 years is likely cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $140,000 Canadian dollars/QALY (~3 × gross domestic product from the World Health Organization). Distribution to people who use illicit opioids was most cost-effective and prevented the most deaths. This is important, as more overdose deaths could be prevented through nationwide public funding of IN naloxone kits through pharmacies, since individuals report a preference for IN naloxone and these formulations are easier to use, save lives and are cost-effective. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2024;157:xx-xx.","PeriodicalId":9476,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17151635241228241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine the cost-effectiveness of pharmacy-based intranasal (IN) and intramuscular (IM) naloxone distribution in Canada. We developed a state-transition model for pharmacy-based naloxone distribution, every 3 years, to illicit, prescription, opioid-agonist therapy and nonopioid use populations compared to no naloxone distribution. We used a monthly cycle length, lifetime horizon and a Canadian provincial Ministry of Health perspective. Transition probabilities, cost and utility data were retrieved from the literature. Costs (2020) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were discounted 1.5% annually. Microsimulation, 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Distribution of naloxone to all Canadians compared to no distribution prevented 151 additional overdose deaths per 10,000 persons, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $50,984 per QALY for IM naloxone and an ICER of $126,060 per QALY for IN naloxone. Distribution of any naloxone to only illicit opioid users was the most cost-effective. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that survival rates for illicit opioid users were most influenced by the availability of either emergency medical services or naloxone. Distribution of IM and IN naloxone to all Canadians every 3 years is likely cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $140,000 Canadian dollars/QALY (~3 × gross domestic product from the World Health Organization). Distribution to people who use illicit opioids was most cost-effective and prevented the most deaths. This is important, as more overdose deaths could be prevented through nationwide public funding of IN naloxone kits through pharmacies, since individuals report a preference for IN naloxone and these formulations are easier to use, save lives and are cost-effective. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2024;157:xx-xx.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大社区药房配发纳洛酮的经济评估
目的是确定在加拿大通过药房分发鼻内(IN)和肌肉注射(IM)纳洛酮的成本效益。与不分发纳洛酮相比,我们建立了一个州过渡模型,用于每 3 年向非法、处方、阿片激动剂治疗和非阿片类药物使用人群分发纳洛酮。我们采用了月度周期长度、终生范围和加拿大省级卫生部的观点。过渡概率、成本和效用数据均来自文献。成本(2020 年)和质量调整生命年(QALY)的年贴现率为 1.5%。进行了微观模拟、单向和概率敏感性分析。与不发放纳洛酮相比,向所有加拿大人发放纳洛酮可防止每 10,000 人中增加 151 例吸毒过量死亡,IM 纳洛酮的增量成本效益比 (ICER) 为每 QALY 50,984 美元,IN 纳洛酮的 ICER 为每 QALY 126,060 美元。仅向非法阿片类药物使用者分发纳洛酮最具成本效益。单向敏感性分析表明,非法阿片类药物使用者的存活率受紧急医疗服务或纳洛酮供应情况的影响最大。每 3 年向所有加拿大人分发一次纳洛酮(IM 和 IN)可能具有成本效益,支付意愿阈值为 140,000 加元/QALY(约为世界卫生组织国内生产总值的 3 倍)。向使用非法阿片类药物的人分发药物最具成本效益,也能防止最多的死亡。这一点非常重要,因为通过药店在全国范围内公共资助 IN 纳洛酮试剂盒,可以预防更多的用药过量死亡,因为据个人报告,他们更喜欢 IN 纳洛酮,而且这些制剂更易于使用,可以挽救生命,成本效益也更高。Can Pharm J (Ott) 2024;157:xx-xx.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Congratulations to our 2024 CPhA award winners! Accessibility reality check Make your mark! Become a CPS author or reviewer Review of the top nephrology studies of 2020-2023 Harmonizing leadership: Blending transactional and transformational styles in pharmacy practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1