Pilot Training Program on Hands-Only CPR and Choking First Aid for Frontline Police Responders in Rural Nepal

G. Thapa, Roshan Sapkota, Anjana Thapa, Rajesh Sharma, Derek Lubetkin, Camille Lubetkin, Samuel Nesemann, Ramu Kharel
{"title":"Pilot Training Program on Hands-Only CPR and Choking First Aid for Frontline Police Responders in Rural Nepal","authors":"G. Thapa, Roshan Sapkota, Anjana Thapa, Rajesh Sharma, Derek Lubetkin, Camille Lubetkin, Samuel Nesemann, Ramu Kharel","doi":"10.1177/10806032241226691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Basic life support (BLS) is an emergency skill that includes performing appropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide and is rising in Nepal. After an OHCA event, a bystander starting CPR quickly has been shown to increase the survival rate. While the Nepali police are generally the first responders to emergencies in rural parts, they are not trained in BLS. This program assesses a pilot training of hands-only CPR and choking first aid to the Nepal Police and Nepal Army participants in rural Nepal. A community-based nonprofit organization, HAPSA-Nepal, coordinated with local government to pilot this program. The program included pre- and post-tests, lectures, videos, and small group hands-on exercises; facilitators included faculty emergency physicians, residents, and medical officers. Structured pre- andp post-test questionnaires, confidence surveys, and skills checklists were conducted. Descriptive analysis examined the respondent's characteristics, and paired t-test was used to compare pretest and post-test scores. A total of 126 participants received the training in this pilot phase. Prior to this training, 98.4% of the participants had not received any CPR training, and 100% of the participants had not received training on first aid for choking. The average pretest score was 4.4 with 95% CI ± 1.75, and the average post-test score was 8.06 with 95% CI ± 1.73 (out of a total of 11). All participants passed the skills assessment. Locally adapted BLS training programs that included hands-only CPR and choking first aid showed a significant knowledge gain and skills competence among the frontline participants.","PeriodicalId":431977,"journal":{"name":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","volume":"108 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032241226691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Basic life support (BLS) is an emergency skill that includes performing appropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide and is rising in Nepal. After an OHCA event, a bystander starting CPR quickly has been shown to increase the survival rate. While the Nepali police are generally the first responders to emergencies in rural parts, they are not trained in BLS. This program assesses a pilot training of hands-only CPR and choking first aid to the Nepal Police and Nepal Army participants in rural Nepal. A community-based nonprofit organization, HAPSA-Nepal, coordinated with local government to pilot this program. The program included pre- and post-tests, lectures, videos, and small group hands-on exercises; facilitators included faculty emergency physicians, residents, and medical officers. Structured pre- andp post-test questionnaires, confidence surveys, and skills checklists were conducted. Descriptive analysis examined the respondent's characteristics, and paired t-test was used to compare pretest and post-test scores. A total of 126 participants received the training in this pilot phase. Prior to this training, 98.4% of the participants had not received any CPR training, and 100% of the participants had not received training on first aid for choking. The average pretest score was 4.4 with 95% CI ± 1.75, and the average post-test score was 8.06 with 95% CI ± 1.73 (out of a total of 11). All participants passed the skills assessment. Locally adapted BLS training programs that included hands-only CPR and choking first aid showed a significant knowledge gain and skills competence among the frontline participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为尼泊尔农村地区一线警务人员开展徒手心肺复苏术和窒息急救试点培训项目
基本生命支持(BLS)是一项急救技能,包括实施适当的心肺复苏(CPR)。院外心脏骤停(OHCA)是导致全球死亡的主要原因,在尼泊尔也呈上升趋势。在发生院外心脏骤停事件后,旁观者迅速开始心肺复苏可提高存活率。虽然尼泊尔警察通常是农村地区紧急情况的第一响应者,但他们没有接受过 BLS 培训。本项目评估了在尼泊尔农村地区对尼泊尔警察和尼泊尔军队参与者进行的心肺复苏术和窒息急救实践试点培训。HAPSA-Nepal 是一个以社区为基础的非营利组织,它与当地政府合作开展了这项试点项目。该项目包括前测和后测、讲座、视频和小组实践练习;主持人包括急诊科医生、住院医师和医务人员。项目还进行了结构化的测试前和测试后问卷调查、信心调查和技能检查表。描述性分析考察了受试者的特征,配对 t 检验比较了测试前和测试后的得分。共有 126 名参与者接受了试点阶段的培训。在培训之前,98.4% 的参与者没有接受过任何心肺复苏培训,100% 的参与者没有接受过窒息急救培训。测试前的平均得分是 4.4(95% CI ± 1.75),测试后的平均得分是 8.06(95% CI ± 1.73)(总分 11 分)。所有参与者均通过了技能评估。根据当地情况调整的 BLS 培训计划包括心肺复苏术和窒息急救,结果显示,一线参与者在知识和技能方面都有显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Bite by Shaw's Short Sea Snake (Hydrophis curtus): A Case of Mild Myotoxicity or a Dry Bite? In reply to Dr Mohanty et al Successful Management of Severe Unresponsive Snake Bite Envenomation Using Plasmapheresis and Corticosteroid at Egyptian National Environmental and Clinical Toxicology Research Center: A Case Report Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Spinal Cord Protection: 2024 Update Pilot Training Program on Hands-Only CPR and Choking First Aid for Frontline Police Responders in Rural Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1