Prolapsed Lumbar Intervertebral Disc (PLID) Surgery and Our Experiences

Md Shoriful Islam, Md Abdul Quader, K. M. R. U. Haq, Md Masud Rana, Hafsa Marium
{"title":"Prolapsed Lumbar Intervertebral Disc (PLID) Surgery and Our Experiences","authors":"Md Shoriful Islam, Md Abdul Quader, K. M. R. U. Haq, Md Masud Rana, Hafsa Marium","doi":"10.3329/dmcj.v9i1.71335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Herniated lumbar disc is the most common specific cause of low back pain. Surgery results in better outcome for cases with exclusive severe radicular pain and health-related quality of life improves after lumbar disc herniation (LDH) surgery. Objective: To determine the outcome of lumbar disc herniation surgery and to assess the effect of factors that could predict the outcome of surgery. Materials and method: This observational study was done in Delta Medical College & Hospital, Mirpur, Dhaka, during March 2016 to January 2019. We evaluated 54 patients who had undergone operations for lumbar disc herniation using three different surgical techniques (laminectomy, fenestration and discectomy, and spinous process osteotomy) for low back pain and radicular pain. Results: Forty six (85.19%) patients were male and 8(14.81%) were female. Age range was 18-60 years. Forty nine (90.74%) were new patient and 5(9.26%) had recurrent disc prolapse. Diagnosis was confirmed by MRI. Fifty (92.59%) patients had no pain after surgery and only 2(3.70%) patients needed reoperation and 2(3.70%) had occasional pain. Conclusion: Surgery for lumbar disc herniation is effective in reducing radicular pain. All three surgical approaches resulted in significant decrease in preoperative radicular pain and low back pain, but 100% good outcome was not achieved.\nDelta Med Col J. Jan 2021;9(1): 28-32","PeriodicalId":53280,"journal":{"name":"Delta Medical College Journal","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delta Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/dmcj.v9i1.71335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Herniated lumbar disc is the most common specific cause of low back pain. Surgery results in better outcome for cases with exclusive severe radicular pain and health-related quality of life improves after lumbar disc herniation (LDH) surgery. Objective: To determine the outcome of lumbar disc herniation surgery and to assess the effect of factors that could predict the outcome of surgery. Materials and method: This observational study was done in Delta Medical College & Hospital, Mirpur, Dhaka, during March 2016 to January 2019. We evaluated 54 patients who had undergone operations for lumbar disc herniation using three different surgical techniques (laminectomy, fenestration and discectomy, and spinous process osteotomy) for low back pain and radicular pain. Results: Forty six (85.19%) patients were male and 8(14.81%) were female. Age range was 18-60 years. Forty nine (90.74%) were new patient and 5(9.26%) had recurrent disc prolapse. Diagnosis was confirmed by MRI. Fifty (92.59%) patients had no pain after surgery and only 2(3.70%) patients needed reoperation and 2(3.70%) had occasional pain. Conclusion: Surgery for lumbar disc herniation is effective in reducing radicular pain. All three surgical approaches resulted in significant decrease in preoperative radicular pain and low back pain, but 100% good outcome was not achieved. Delta Med Col J. Jan 2021;9(1): 28-32
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰椎间盘突出 (PLID) 手术和我们的经验
背景:腰椎间盘突出症是腰痛最常见的特殊原因。腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)手术治疗后,有严重根性疼痛的病例可获得更好的疗效,与健康相关的生活质量也会得到改善。目的:确定腰椎间盘突出症手术的疗效:确定腰椎间盘突出症手术的结果,并评估可预测手术结果的因素的影响。材料和方法:这项观察性研究于 2016 年 3 月至 2019 年 1 月期间在达卡米尔布尔的德尔塔医学院和医院进行。我们对 54 名因腰痛和根性疼痛而接受腰椎间盘突出症手术的患者进行了评估,这些患者采用了三种不同的手术技术(椎板切除术、椎间孔和椎间盘切除术以及棘突截骨术)。结果46例(85.19%)患者为男性,8例(14.81%)为女性。年龄范围为 18-60 岁。49例(90.74%)为新患者,5例(9.26%)为复发性椎间盘突出症患者。诊断由磁共振成像确认。50名(92.59%)患者术后无疼痛,只有2名(3.70%)患者需要再次手术,2名(3.70%)患者有偶发性疼痛。结论腰椎间盘突出症手术能有效减轻根性疼痛。所有三种手术方法都能显著减轻术前的根性疼痛和腰痛,但并不能达到 100% 的良好疗效:28-32
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment Related Factors Associated with Non-adherence to Anti-Tuberculosis Treatment Role of Adding Topical Metronidazole in the Treatment of Acute Anal Fissure The Role of Transvaginal Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Postmenopausal Bleeding Comparative Efficacy of Seed Extract of Tamarindus indica and Vitamin E on the Liver Weight of Long Evan’s Rats Intoxicated with Paracetamol Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1