A state-by-state comparison of policies that protect private well users

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1038/s41370-024-00645-2
Katlyn Schmitt, Darya Minovi, Sophie Loeb, Mary H. Ward
{"title":"A state-by-state comparison of policies that protect private well users","authors":"Katlyn Schmitt, Darya Minovi, Sophie Loeb, Mary H. Ward","doi":"10.1038/s41370-024-00645-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the Safe Drinking Water Act allows states and localities to adopt stronger protections for drinking water, state and local requirements concerning private drinking water wells vary dramatically and often do not provide necessary protections for residents who rely on well water. This paper inventories ten types of policies including laws, regulations, programs, and activities that states have adopted or partaken in to encourage safe drinking water for residential well owners. To identify categories of private well protections, we conducted a preliminary internet search with key search terms to create an initial list of 10 categories of laws, regulations, programs, and activities (collectively referred to as “policies”) that states have taken to protect residential well water quality. To have a private well safety category present, the law, regulation, program, or activity must fit within the scope of the ten classifications. To limit the breadth of our search, we excluded local and county protections, as well as activities by non-governmental organizations. We also excluded basic construction standards for new wells and licensing standards for well drillers, both of which are covered under a previous study. We conducted an additional internet search to complete a comprehensive review of each state and category and to validate our previous findings. In addition to this internet search, we completed phone and email outreach to the state agencies implementing the well safety categories identified in our internet search to confirm our results. The results indicate a wide range of state-based well water protections. The number of residential well water protections present in each state ranged from 8 policies in Iowa, Kentucky, and Maine to 1 policy in Oklahoma, with a median of 5 policies across the 50 states.","PeriodicalId":15684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","volume":"34 1","pages":"155-160"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-024-00645-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the Safe Drinking Water Act allows states and localities to adopt stronger protections for drinking water, state and local requirements concerning private drinking water wells vary dramatically and often do not provide necessary protections for residents who rely on well water. This paper inventories ten types of policies including laws, regulations, programs, and activities that states have adopted or partaken in to encourage safe drinking water for residential well owners. To identify categories of private well protections, we conducted a preliminary internet search with key search terms to create an initial list of 10 categories of laws, regulations, programs, and activities (collectively referred to as “policies”) that states have taken to protect residential well water quality. To have a private well safety category present, the law, regulation, program, or activity must fit within the scope of the ten classifications. To limit the breadth of our search, we excluded local and county protections, as well as activities by non-governmental organizations. We also excluded basic construction standards for new wells and licensing standards for well drillers, both of which are covered under a previous study. We conducted an additional internet search to complete a comprehensive review of each state and category and to validate our previous findings. In addition to this internet search, we completed phone and email outreach to the state agencies implementing the well safety categories identified in our internet search to confirm our results. The results indicate a wide range of state-based well water protections. The number of residential well water protections present in each state ranged from 8 policies in Iowa, Kentucky, and Maine to 1 policy in Oklahoma, with a median of 5 policies across the 50 states.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各州保护私人水井使用者政策的比较。
背景:尽管《安全饮用水法案》允许各州和地方对饮用水采取更有力的保护措施,但各州和地方对私人饮用水井的要求却大相径庭,往往无法为依赖井水的居民提供必要的保护:本文盘点了各州为鼓励住宅水井所有者安全饮用水而采取或参与的十类政策,包括法律、法规、计划和活动:为了确定私家水井保护措施的类别,我们利用关键搜索词在互联网上进行了初步搜索,初步列出了各州为保护住宅水井水质而采取的 10 类法律、法规、计划和活动(统称为 "政策")。法律、法规、计划或活动必须符合这 10 个分类的范围,才属于私家水井安全类别。为了限制搜索范围,我们排除了地方和县的保护措施以及非政府组织的活动。我们还排除了新井的基本施工标准和钻井工人的许可标准,这两项标准在之前的研究中都有涉及。我们又进行了一次互联网搜索,以完成对每个州和类别的全面审查,并验证我们之前的发现。除互联网搜索外,我们还通过电话和电子邮件与实施互联网搜索中确定的水井安全类别的州政府机构进行了联系,以确认我们的结果:结果表明,各州的井水保护措施范围广泛。从爱荷华州、肯塔基州和缅因州的 8 项政策到俄克拉荷马州的 1 项政策不等,50 个州的中位数为 5 项政策:本文探讨了各州为保障住宅井水水质和保护依赖井水的人们的健康而实施的保护措施。这项研究审查了州一级的法规、法律和计划,而不是地方、市、县一级或准政府对住宅井所有者的保护措施。住宅水井政策共分为十类。在联邦一级没有任何保护措施的情况下,本研究揭示了各州法规中存在的差距,并表明有必要更广泛地采用全面的州级政策,以更好地保护住宅井所有者免受饮用水污染物及其相关的公共健康影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (JESEE) aims to be the premier and authoritative source of information on advances in exposure science for professionals in a wide range of environmental and public health disciplines. JESEE publishes original peer-reviewed research presenting significant advances in exposure science and exposure analysis, including development and application of the latest technologies for measuring exposures, and innovative computational approaches for translating novel data streams to characterize and predict exposures. The types of papers published in the research section of JESEE are original research articles, translation studies, and correspondence. Reported results should further understanding of the relationship between environmental exposure and human health, describe evaluated novel exposure science tools, or demonstrate potential of exposure science to enable decisions and actions that promote and protect human health.
期刊最新文献
Additive effect of high transportation noise exposure and socioeconomic deprivation on stress-associated neural activity, atherosclerotic inflammation, and cardiovascular disease events. Air pollution mixture exposure during pregnancy and postpartum psychological functioning: racial/ethnic- and fetal sex-specific associations. Prenatal ozone exposure and risk of intellectual disability. Assessment of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution: An exposure framework. Environmental public health research at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A blueprint for exposure science in a connected world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1