Fraud victimization across the lifespan: evidence on repeat victimization using perpetrator data.

IF 1.6 2区 心理学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1080/08946566.2024.2321923
Marguerite DeLiema, Lynn Langton, Daniel Brannock, Edward Preble
{"title":"Fraud victimization across the lifespan: evidence on repeat victimization using perpetrator data.","authors":"Marguerite DeLiema, Lynn Langton, Daniel Brannock, Edward Preble","doi":"10.1080/08946566.2024.2321923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Older adults are thought to be more susceptible to scams, yet understanding the relationship between chronological age and victimization is limited by underreporting. This study avoids underreporting bias by merging four longitudinal databases of Americans (<i>N</i> = 1.33 million) who paid money in response to mail scams over 20 years. We investigate the risk of repeat victimization and victimization by multiple scam types over the life course. Victims in their 70s and 80s are 9% more likely to experience another victimization incident than those in their 50s. Those age 18 to 29 are 24% <i>less</i> likely to experience another victimization incident. Relative to adults in their 50s, the odds of victimization by multiple scams are greater for those in their 60s and 70s, but lower for those 80 + . This study demonstrates the research potential in using scammers' data to understand patterns of victimization. Fraud prevention efforts should target older individuals who are at higher risk of repeat victimization and suffer greater losses as a result.</p>","PeriodicalId":46983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","volume":" ","pages":"227-250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2024.2321923","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Older adults are thought to be more susceptible to scams, yet understanding the relationship between chronological age and victimization is limited by underreporting. This study avoids underreporting bias by merging four longitudinal databases of Americans (N = 1.33 million) who paid money in response to mail scams over 20 years. We investigate the risk of repeat victimization and victimization by multiple scam types over the life course. Victims in their 70s and 80s are 9% more likely to experience another victimization incident than those in their 50s. Those age 18 to 29 are 24% less likely to experience another victimization incident. Relative to adults in their 50s, the odds of victimization by multiple scams are greater for those in their 60s and 70s, but lower for those 80 + . This study demonstrates the research potential in using scammers' data to understand patterns of victimization. Fraud prevention efforts should target older individuals who are at higher risk of repeat victimization and suffer greater losses as a result.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨越生命周期的欺诈受害情况:利用犯罪人数据证明重复受害情况。
人们认为老年人更容易受到诈骗,但由于报告不足,人们对实际年龄与受害情况之间关系的了解受到限制。本研究通过合并四个纵向数据库来避免报告不足的偏差,这些数据库包含了 20 年来为应对邮件诈骗而支付钱款的美国人(总数 = 133 万人)。我们调查了重复受害的风险和一生中多种诈骗类型的受害风险。与 50 多岁的受害者相比,70 多岁和 80 多岁的受害者再次受害的可能性要高出 9%。18-29 岁的受害者再次受害的可能性要低 24%。与 50 多岁的成年人相比,60 多岁和 70 多岁的人遭受多重诈骗的几率更大,但 80 多岁的人遭受多重诈骗的几率较低。这项研究表明,利用诈骗者的数据来了解受害模式具有研究潜力。预防诈骗工作应针对老年人,因为他们重复受害的风险更高,因此遭受的损失也更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.80%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect is the peer-reviewed quarterly journal that explores the advances in research, policy and practice, and clinical and ethical issues surrounding the abuse and neglect of older people. This unique forum provides state-of-the-art research and practice that is both international and multidisciplinary in scope. The journal"s broad, comprehensive approach is only one of its strengths—it presents training issues, research findings, case studies, practice and policy issues, book and media reviews, commentary, and historical background on a wide range of topics. Readers get tools and techniques needed for better detecting and responding to actual or potential elder abuse and neglect.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the relationship between self-neglect and spiritual well-being in older adults. No, thank you: reasons for withdrawal from older adult abuse support services. Elder abuse in Flanders, Belgium: perspectives from home care nurses. Older adults who use drugs: an examination of policy and preparedness in nursing facilities. Transforming learning for adult protective services caseworker certification training: program evaluation of simulation training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1