The STING in the tale of Teflon®: Delayed ureteric obstruction after subureteric transurethral injection with polytetrafluoroethylene paste for vesicoureteral reflux

Matthew Murphy , Lorraine Scanlon , Mutaz Elamin , Charles O'Connor , Nick Mayer , Ciaran Brady , Derek Hennessey
{"title":"The STING in the tale of Teflon®: Delayed ureteric obstruction after subureteric transurethral injection with polytetrafluoroethylene paste for vesicoureteral reflux","authors":"Matthew Murphy ,&nbsp;Lorraine Scanlon ,&nbsp;Mutaz Elamin ,&nbsp;Charles O'Connor ,&nbsp;Nick Mayer ,&nbsp;Ciaran Brady ,&nbsp;Derek Hennessey","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div><span>“Subureteric Teflon<span> INGection” (STING) of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE/polytef) paste to treat vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children was popularised in 1984. It was later abandoned as an implantation material because of the possibility of migration from the </span></span>injection site<span><span><span>. Giant-cell foreign-body granuloma to Polytef in the </span>bladder is a rare cause of </span>ureteric obstruction. Only a handful of cases have been reported in the literature.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a prospective analysis of a series of 6 adult patients who had childhood STING and presented with foreign-body granuloma to Polytef in the bladder. We report their clinical presentation, findings and treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span><span>1 male and 5 females with a history of STING procedure in childhood for VUR presented in later life with foreign-body granuloma to Polytef. The median age at first STING procedure and at presentation to the Urology Department was 3 and 34 years respectively. The most common clinical presentations were </span>flank pain and </span>urinary tract infection<span> (UTI) and all patients had radiological findings<span> of calcified lesions at the vesicoureteric junction(s). 4 patients had histological findings of giant-cell foreign-body granuloma. 4 patients required definitive ureteric reimplantation.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Polytef granuloma causing distal ureteric obstruction<span> may give rise to significant morbidity and renal damage. Due to the likelihood of progression of the granuloma, excision and ureteric reimplantation is considered the standard approach in the management of patients with viable kidneys.</span></div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>Level 5.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":"22 6","pages":"Pages 377-382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X24000167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

“Subureteric Teflon INGection” (STING) of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE/polytef) paste to treat vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children was popularised in 1984. It was later abandoned as an implantation material because of the possibility of migration from the injection site. Giant-cell foreign-body granuloma to Polytef in the bladder is a rare cause of ureteric obstruction. Only a handful of cases have been reported in the literature.

Methods

We performed a prospective analysis of a series of 6 adult patients who had childhood STING and presented with foreign-body granuloma to Polytef in the bladder. We report their clinical presentation, findings and treatment.

Results

1 male and 5 females with a history of STING procedure in childhood for VUR presented in later life with foreign-body granuloma to Polytef. The median age at first STING procedure and at presentation to the Urology Department was 3 and 34 years respectively. The most common clinical presentations were flank pain and urinary tract infection (UTI) and all patients had radiological findings of calcified lesions at the vesicoureteric junction(s). 4 patients had histological findings of giant-cell foreign-body granuloma. 4 patients required definitive ureteric reimplantation.

Conclusion

Polytef granuloma causing distal ureteric obstruction may give rise to significant morbidity and renal damage. Due to the likelihood of progression of the granuloma, excision and ureteric reimplantation is considered the standard approach in the management of patients with viable kidneys.

Level of evidence

Level 5.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teflon® 故事中的 STING:输尿管下经尿道注入聚四氟乙烯糊剂治疗膀胱输尿管反流后的延迟性输尿管梗阻。
导言:聚四氟乙烯(PTFE/polytef)糊剂的 "输尿管下特氟龙植入术"(STING)用于治疗儿童膀胱输尿管反流(VUR)。后来,由于聚四氟乙烯可能会从注射部位移出,因此被放弃用作植入材料。膀胱中的保利龙巨细胞异物肉芽肿是输尿管梗阻的罕见病因。文献中仅报道了少数病例:方法:我们对6例患有儿童STING并伴有膀胱Polytef异物肉芽肿的成年患者进行了前瞻性分析。我们报告了他们的临床表现、检查结果和治疗方法:结果:1 名男性和 5 名女性在儿童时期曾因膀胱尿失禁接受过 STING 手术治疗,后来出现了膀胱异物肉芽肿。首次接受 STING 手术和到泌尿科就诊的中位年龄分别为 3 岁和 34 岁。最常见的临床表现是侧腹疼痛和尿路感染(UTI),所有患者均有膀胱输尿管交界处钙化病变的放射学检查结果。4 名患者的组织学检查结果为巨细胞异物肉芽肿。4名患者需要进行输尿管再植手术:结论:引起输尿管远端梗阻的多形性肉芽肿可能会导致严重的发病率和肾损伤。由于肉芽肿有可能恶化,切除术和输尿管再植术被认为是治疗肾脏存活患者的标准方法:证据等级:5 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
期刊最新文献
Enhancements in artificial intelligence for medical examinations: A leap from ChatGPT 3.5 to ChatGPT 4.0 in the FRCS trauma & orthopaedics examination. A boost to concentration or a distracting noise? A systematic review of surgeon and anaesthetist perspectives of the benefit of intra-operative music. List of editors Surgeon ability to predict physical activity and sedentary time: Comparison of self-reported and measured activity Sensitivity and specificity of surgeons' intra-operative diagnosis of appendicitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1