Comparative analysis of cytotoxicity effects of two denture hard lining materials on human gingival fibroblasts: an in vitro study

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Saudi Dental Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.02.005
Somayeh Hashemi , Reza Nahidi , Homeyra Ansari , Kiarash Firoozi , Rata Rokhshad
{"title":"Comparative analysis of cytotoxicity effects of two denture hard lining materials on human gingival fibroblasts: an in vitro study","authors":"Somayeh Hashemi ,&nbsp;Reza Nahidi ,&nbsp;Homeyra Ansari ,&nbsp;Kiarash Firoozi ,&nbsp;Rata Rokhshad","doi":"10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The objective of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of TDV and Rebase II denture hard liners on human gingival fibroblasts, aiming to address issues associated with incomplete polymerization and free monomers that affect material properties.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seventy-two specimens (24 each of TDV, Rebase II, and controls) were prepared under aseptic conditions according to factory instructions. Cytotoxicity was determined using the MTT test with methyl tetrazolium salt added to the cell culture medium. A two-way ANOVA and a post-hoc Tukey test was used to evaluate the results of incubation before mitochondrial activity was measured using Multiscan spectrophotometry (570 nm).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were significant differences in cell viability between the groups after 24 hours (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), with TDV having higher viability than Rebase II. The difference between Rebase II and TDV, however, was not significant at 48 and 96 hours (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.131). At 24 hours, Rebase II exhibited significantly lower viability than TDV liner, with a significant difference between the two groups (<em>P</em> = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Due to the maximum monomer release in the early hours of incubation, the amount of cytotoxicity decreased with increasing incubation time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47246,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Dental Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905224000579/pdfft?md5=59ac1a440f857db1496a393b600d79b8&pid=1-s2.0-S1013905224000579-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905224000579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of TDV and Rebase II denture hard liners on human gingival fibroblasts, aiming to address issues associated with incomplete polymerization and free monomers that affect material properties.

Methods

Seventy-two specimens (24 each of TDV, Rebase II, and controls) were prepared under aseptic conditions according to factory instructions. Cytotoxicity was determined using the MTT test with methyl tetrazolium salt added to the cell culture medium. A two-way ANOVA and a post-hoc Tukey test was used to evaluate the results of incubation before mitochondrial activity was measured using Multiscan spectrophotometry (570 nm).

Results

There were significant differences in cell viability between the groups after 24 hours (P < 0.001), with TDV having higher viability than Rebase II. The difference between Rebase II and TDV, however, was not significant at 48 and 96 hours (P > 0.131). At 24 hours, Rebase II exhibited significantly lower viability than TDV liner, with a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Due to the maximum monomer release in the early hours of incubation, the amount of cytotoxicity decreased with increasing incubation time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种义齿硬衬材料对人牙龈成纤维细胞细胞毒性作用的比较分析:体外研究
背景本研究的目的是比较 TDV 和 Rebase II 义齿硬衬对人类牙龈成纤维细胞的细胞毒性,旨在解决与不完全聚合和影响材料特性的游离单体有关的问题。细胞毒性采用在细胞培养基中加入甲基四氮唑盐的 MTT 试验进行测定。在使用 Multiscan 分光光度法(570 nm)测量线粒体活性之前,采用双向方差分析和事后 Tukey 检验来评估培养结果。结果24 小时后,各组细胞存活率存在显著差异(P <0.001),TDV 的存活率高于 Rebase II。然而,在 48 小时和 96 小时时,Rebase II 和 TDV 之间的差异并不明显(P > 0.131)。在 24 小时内,Rebase II 的存活率明显低于 TDV 内衬,两组之间差异显著(P = 0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Dental Journal
Saudi Dental Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Dental Journal is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of dentistry. Saudi Dental Journal publishes original research and reviews on, but not limited to: • dental disease • clinical trials • dental equipment • new and experimental techniques • epidemiology and oral health • restorative dentistry • periodontology • endodontology • prosthodontics • paediatric dentistry • orthodontics and dental education Saudi Dental Journal is the official publication of the Saudi Dental Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board What is the impact of patient attributes, implant characteristics, surgical techniques, and placement location on the success of orthodontic mini-implants in young adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis The effect of derum (bark of Juglans regia tree) extract on oral mucosa: An in vivo study based on epithelial atypia in rabbit model Impact of proton pump inhibitors on periodontal health – A systematic review Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1