Radical prostatectomy cancer grade and percentage of Gleason pattern 4 estimated by global vs individual tumor grading correlate differently with the risk of biochemical recurrence in Grade Group 2 and 3 cancers.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqae003
Oleksandr N Kryvenko, Jonathan I Epstein, Ali Merhe, Oleksii A Iakymenko, Ricardo De Almeida E Silva Junior, Dimple Kumar Chanamolu, Laurence M Briski, Deukwoo Kwon, Ivan Nemov, Sanoj Punnen, Alan Pollack, Radka Stoyanova, Dipen J Parekh, Merce Jorda, Mark L Gonzalgo
{"title":"Radical prostatectomy cancer grade and percentage of Gleason pattern 4 estimated by global vs individual tumor grading correlate differently with the risk of biochemical recurrence in Grade Group 2 and 3 cancers.","authors":"Oleksandr N Kryvenko, Jonathan I Epstein, Ali Merhe, Oleksii A Iakymenko, Ricardo De Almeida E Silva Junior, Dimple Kumar Chanamolu, Laurence M Briski, Deukwoo Kwon, Ivan Nemov, Sanoj Punnen, Alan Pollack, Radka Stoyanova, Dipen J Parekh, Merce Jorda, Mark L Gonzalgo","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqae003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There are 2 grading approaches to radical prostatectomy (RP) in multifocal cancer: Grade Group (GG) and percentage of Gleason pattern 4 (GP4%). We investigated whether RP GG and GP4% generated by global vs individual tumor grading correlate differently with biochemical recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed 531 RP specimens with GG2 or GG3 cancer. Each tumor was scored separately with assessment of tumor volume and GP4%. Global grade and GP4% were assigned by combining Gleason pattern 3 and 4 volumes for all tumors. Correlation of GG and GP4% generated by 2 methods with biochemical recurrence was assessed by Cox proportional hazard regression and receiver operating characteristic curves, with optimism adjustment using a bootstrap analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age was 63 (range, 42-79) years. Median prostate-specific antigen was 6.3 (range, 0.3-62.9) ng/mL. In total, the highest-grade tumor in 371 (36.9%) men was GG2 and in 160 (30.1%) men was GG3. Global grading was downgraded from GG3 to GG2 in 37 of 121 (30.6%) specimens with multifocal disease, and 145 of 404 (35.9%) specimens had GP4% decreased by at least 10%. Ninety-eight men experienced biochemical recurrence within a median of 13 (range, 3-119) months. Men without biochemical recurrence were followed up for a median of 47 (range, 12-205) months. Grade Group, GP4%, and margin status correlated with the risk of biochemical recurrence using highest-grade tumor and global grading, but the degrees of these correlations varied and were statistically significantly different between the 2 grading approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Grade Group, GP4%, and margin status derived by global vs individual tumor grading predict postoperative biochemical recurrence statistically significantly differently. This difference has important implications if results derived from cohorts graded using different methods are compared.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqae003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: There are 2 grading approaches to radical prostatectomy (RP) in multifocal cancer: Grade Group (GG) and percentage of Gleason pattern 4 (GP4%). We investigated whether RP GG and GP4% generated by global vs individual tumor grading correlate differently with biochemical recurrence.

Methods: We reviewed 531 RP specimens with GG2 or GG3 cancer. Each tumor was scored separately with assessment of tumor volume and GP4%. Global grade and GP4% were assigned by combining Gleason pattern 3 and 4 volumes for all tumors. Correlation of GG and GP4% generated by 2 methods with biochemical recurrence was assessed by Cox proportional hazard regression and receiver operating characteristic curves, with optimism adjustment using a bootstrap analysis.

Results: Median age was 63 (range, 42-79) years. Median prostate-specific antigen was 6.3 (range, 0.3-62.9) ng/mL. In total, the highest-grade tumor in 371 (36.9%) men was GG2 and in 160 (30.1%) men was GG3. Global grading was downgraded from GG3 to GG2 in 37 of 121 (30.6%) specimens with multifocal disease, and 145 of 404 (35.9%) specimens had GP4% decreased by at least 10%. Ninety-eight men experienced biochemical recurrence within a median of 13 (range, 3-119) months. Men without biochemical recurrence were followed up for a median of 47 (range, 12-205) months. Grade Group, GP4%, and margin status correlated with the risk of biochemical recurrence using highest-grade tumor and global grading, but the degrees of these correlations varied and were statistically significantly different between the 2 grading approaches.

Conclusions: Grade Group, GP4%, and margin status derived by global vs individual tumor grading predict postoperative biochemical recurrence statistically significantly differently. This difference has important implications if results derived from cohorts graded using different methods are compared.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根治性前列腺切除术的癌症分级以及通过整体肿瘤分级和单个肿瘤分级估算的格里森模式4的比例与2级和3级癌症的生化复发风险有不同的相关性。
目的:多灶性癌症的根治性前列腺切除术(RP)有两种分级方法:分级组(GG)和格里森模式 4 百分比(GP4%)。我们研究了整体肿瘤分级与单个肿瘤分级产生的 RP GG 和 GP4% 与生化复发的相关性是否不同:我们回顾了 531 例 GG2 或 GG3 癌症的 RP 标本。对每个肿瘤分别进行评分,评估肿瘤体积和 GP4%。通过合并所有肿瘤的格里森模式 3 和 4 肿瘤体积,确定总体分级和 GP4%。通过Cox比例危险回归和接收器操作特征曲线评估两种方法得出的GG和GP4%与生化复发的相关性,并使用自举分析进行乐观调整:中位年龄为 63 岁(42-79 岁)。前列腺特异性抗原中位数为 6.3(范围:0.3-62.9)纳克/毫升。总共有 371 名男性(36.9%)的最高分级肿瘤为 GG2,160 名男性(30.1%)的最高分级肿瘤为 GG3。121例(30.6%)多灶性疾病标本中有37例的整体分级从GG3降为GG2,404例(35.9%)标本中有145例的GP4%下降了至少10%。98名男性在中位 13 个月(3-119 个月)内出现生化复发。没有生化复发的男性的随访时间中位数为 47 个月(12-205 个月)。分级组、GP4%和边缘状态与使用最高级别肿瘤和整体分级的生化复发风险相关,但这些相关的程度各不相同,并且在两种分级方法之间存在显著的统计学差异:结论:通过整体与单个肿瘤分级得出的分级组、GP4%和边缘状态对术后生化复发的预测在统计学上有显著差异。如果比较使用不同方法分级的队列得出的结果,这种差异具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1