Diagnostic utility of point-of-care ultrasound and optical coherence tomography for papilloedema in children: a prospective pilot study.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY British Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1136/bjo-2023-324552
Hannah H Chiu, Nouf Al-Farsi, Agnes M F Wong, Adrienne Davis, Mark O Tessaro, Michael J Wan
{"title":"Diagnostic utility of point-of-care ultrasound and optical coherence tomography for papilloedema in children: a prospective pilot study.","authors":"Hannah H Chiu, Nouf Al-Farsi, Agnes M F Wong, Adrienne Davis, Mark O Tessaro, Michael J Wan","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2023-324552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Papilloedema is an important sign of serious neurological disease, but it can be difficult to detect on funduscopy. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detecting papilloedema in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational study at a tertiary care paediatric hospital. Patients were eligible for the study if they underwent a lumbar puncture with opening pressure and had high-quality POCUS and OCT imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 63 eyes from 32 patients were included in the study, 41 (65%) with papilloedema and 22 (35%) without. There were statistically significant differences between the groups in the optic disc elevation (ODE) (p<0.001) and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) (p<0.001) on POCUS, and in the average retinal nerve fibre layer (rNFL) thickness on OCT (p<0.001). Average rNFL thickness had the highest diagnostic accuracy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.999 and a 100% sensitivity and 95% specificity for papilloedema (threshold value of ≥108 µm). ODE had an AUC of 0.866 and a 93% sensitivity and 55% specificity (threshold value of ≥0.5 mm). ONSD had an AUC of 0.786 and a 93% sensitivity and 45% specificity (threshold value of ≥5.5 mm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both OCT and POCUS are potentially useful tools to help diagnose papilloedema in children. Larger studies are needed to further define the role and accuracy of POCUS and OCT in assessing papilloedema in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2023-324552","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Papilloedema is an important sign of serious neurological disease, but it can be difficult to detect on funduscopy. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detecting papilloedema in children.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study at a tertiary care paediatric hospital. Patients were eligible for the study if they underwent a lumbar puncture with opening pressure and had high-quality POCUS and OCT imaging.

Results: A total of 63 eyes from 32 patients were included in the study, 41 (65%) with papilloedema and 22 (35%) without. There were statistically significant differences between the groups in the optic disc elevation (ODE) (p<0.001) and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) (p<0.001) on POCUS, and in the average retinal nerve fibre layer (rNFL) thickness on OCT (p<0.001). Average rNFL thickness had the highest diagnostic accuracy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.999 and a 100% sensitivity and 95% specificity for papilloedema (threshold value of ≥108 µm). ODE had an AUC of 0.866 and a 93% sensitivity and 55% specificity (threshold value of ≥0.5 mm). ONSD had an AUC of 0.786 and a 93% sensitivity and 45% specificity (threshold value of ≥5.5 mm).

Conclusion: Both OCT and POCUS are potentially useful tools to help diagnose papilloedema in children. Larger studies are needed to further define the role and accuracy of POCUS and OCT in assessing papilloedema in children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理点超声波和光学相干断层扫描对儿童乳头水肿的诊断效用:一项前瞻性试点研究。
背景/目的:乳头水肿是严重神经系统疾病的重要征兆,但眼底检查很难发现。本研究旨在确定床旁超声(POCUS)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)在检测儿童乳头水肿方面的诊断准确性:这是一项在一家三级儿科医院进行的前瞻性观察研究。如果患者进行了腰椎穿刺,并有高质量的 POCUS 和 OCT 成像,则符合研究条件:研究共纳入了 32 名患者的 63 只眼睛,其中 41 只(65%)患有乳头水肿,22 只(35%)没有乳头水肿。两组患者的视盘抬高(ODE)差异有统计学意义(p):OCT和POCUS都是帮助诊断儿童乳头水肿的潜在有用工具。需要进行更大规模的研究,进一步明确POCUS和OCT在评估儿童乳头水肿中的作用和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
期刊最新文献
Impact of microorganism virulence on endophthalmitis outcomes Progressive inner retinal neurodegeneration in non-proliferative macular telangiectasia type 2 Effect of intravenous methylprednisolone on serum antibody levels in thyroid eye disease The aqueous humour dynamics in primary angle closure disease: a computational study Retinal curvature in Chinese children with myopia measured by ultra-widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1