Guidelines on Gestational and Congenital Syphilis: insights of health professionals in Bolívar (Colombia)

Soraya Patricia Salas-Romero, Zorayda Barrios-Puerta, Kendy Paola Madero-Zambrano, Ana María Bello-Trujillo
{"title":"Guidelines on Gestational and Congenital Syphilis: insights of health professionals in Bolívar (Colombia)","authors":"Soraya Patricia Salas-Romero, Zorayda Barrios-Puerta, Kendy Paola Madero-Zambrano, Ana María Bello-Trujillo","doi":"10.18597/rcog.4012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the knowledge, appropriateness and practices regarding the evidence-based “Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for the comprehensive management of gestational syphilis (GS) and congenital syphilis (CS)”.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A descriptive, cross-sectional study including general practitioners, specialists and nurses working at 52 healthcare institutions in the Bolivar Department (Colombia) who provided prenatal control or neonatal care in 2020. Convenience sampling was used. A digital questionnaire was administered to collect sociodemographic information, assessed knowledge, appropriateness and practices in terms of the evidenced-based “Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG)\" mentioned in the objectives. A descriptive analysis followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 workers were included. There are deficiencies associated with the correct use of the inverse algorithm of diagnosis (48 %) and GS followup (77 %), management of the patient with a history of systemic manifestation allergies (31 %) and treatment of GS (61 %) and CS (10 %). The recommendation of not using the penicillin test in patients with no history of systemic allergies is considered of little benefit (60 %). 23 % of the workers do not use rapid tests and 44 % of the specialists administer syphilis treatment to the sexual partner.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is important to intensify the training strategies for health personnel with emphasis on nurses and, as a matter of urgency, empower them in syphilis control activities. New and continuous national and regional evaluations of the implementation of these guidelines are needed to assess the indicators associated with the strategy for the elimination of this disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":101422,"journal":{"name":"Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10911418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.4012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the knowledge, appropriateness and practices regarding the evidence-based “Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for the comprehensive management of gestational syphilis (GS) and congenital syphilis (CS)”.

Material and methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study including general practitioners, specialists and nurses working at 52 healthcare institutions in the Bolivar Department (Colombia) who provided prenatal control or neonatal care in 2020. Convenience sampling was used. A digital questionnaire was administered to collect sociodemographic information, assessed knowledge, appropriateness and practices in terms of the evidenced-based “Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG)" mentioned in the objectives. A descriptive analysis followed.

Results: A total of 101 workers were included. There are deficiencies associated with the correct use of the inverse algorithm of diagnosis (48 %) and GS followup (77 %), management of the patient with a history of systemic manifestation allergies (31 %) and treatment of GS (61 %) and CS (10 %). The recommendation of not using the penicillin test in patients with no history of systemic allergies is considered of little benefit (60 %). 23 % of the workers do not use rapid tests and 44 % of the specialists administer syphilis treatment to the sexual partner.

Conclusions: It is important to intensify the training strategies for health personnel with emphasis on nurses and, as a matter of urgency, empower them in syphilis control activities. New and continuous national and regional evaluations of the implementation of these guidelines are needed to assess the indicators associated with the strategy for the elimination of this disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guía de Sífilis Gestacional y Congénita: perspectivas de profesionales de la salud en Bolívar (Colombia) [妊娠和先天性梅毒指南:哥伦比亚玻利瓦尔卫生专业人员的观点]。
目的:描述 "妊娠期(GS)和先天性(CS)梅毒综合护理循证临床实践指南(CPG)"的相关知识、适宜性和实践。材料与方法:描述性横断面研究。研究对象包括在玻利瓦尔省(哥伦比亚)52家医疗机构工作的全科医生、专科医生和护士,他们在2020年从事产前控制或新生儿护理工作。方便抽样。采用数字问卷收集社会人口信息;评估目标中提到的 "临床实践指南(CPG)"的知识、适用性和实践。结果:101 名工作人员参与了问卷调查。在正确应用逆向算法诊断(48%)和随访 OS(77%)、管理有全身表现过敏史的患者(31%)以及治疗 OS(61%)和 CS(10%)方面存在不足。对于无全身过敏史的患者,建议不进行青霉素检测被认为是无益的(60%)。结论:必须加强对医护人员的培训策略,重点是护士,当务之急是增强他们在梅毒控制相关活动中的能力。需要对这些指导方针的执行情况进行新的、持续的国家和地区评估,以评估消除梅毒战略中的各项指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Colombian consensus for the molecular diagnosis of endometrial cancer Expert consensus: Profiling and management of advanced or metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer Comments on the article entitled “Risk factors associated with insulin requirement in patients with gestational diabetes in a referral hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina: retrospective cohort study” Preoperative neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian cancer Prenatal diagnosis of Freeman-Sheldon syndrome using ultrasound and genetic testing. Case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1