PROTOCOL: Effects of social prescribing for older adults: An evidence and gap map

IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Campbell Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1002/cl2.1382
Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu, Vivian Welch, Mojde Yaqubi, Omar Dewidar, Victoria I. Barbeau, Srija Biswas, Kiffer Card, Sonia Hsiung, Caitlin Muhl, Michelle Nelson, Douglas M. Salzwedel, Marianne Saragosa, Cindy Yu, Kate Mulligan, Paul Hébert
{"title":"PROTOCOL: Effects of social prescribing for older adults: An evidence and gap map","authors":"Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu,&nbsp;Vivian Welch,&nbsp;Mojde Yaqubi,&nbsp;Omar Dewidar,&nbsp;Victoria I. Barbeau,&nbsp;Srija Biswas,&nbsp;Kiffer Card,&nbsp;Sonia Hsiung,&nbsp;Caitlin Muhl,&nbsp;Michelle Nelson,&nbsp;Douglas M. Salzwedel,&nbsp;Marianne Saragosa,&nbsp;Cindy Yu,&nbsp;Kate Mulligan,&nbsp;Paul Hébert","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This is the protocol for an evidence and gap map. The objectives are as follows: The aim of this evidence and gap map is to map the available evidence on the effectiveness of social prescribing interventions addressing a non-medical, health-related social need for older adults in any setting.</p>\n \n <p>Specific objectives are as follows:</p>\n \n <div>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li><span>1. </span>\n \n <p>To identify existing evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews on the effects of community-based interventions that address non-medical, health-related social needs of older adults to improve their health and wellbeing.</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>2. </span>\n \n <p>To identify research evidence gaps for new high-quality primary studies and systematic reviews.</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>3. </span>\n \n <p>To highlight evidence of health equity considerations from included primary studies and systematic reviews.</p>\n </li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1382","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.1382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This is the protocol for an evidence and gap map. The objectives are as follows: The aim of this evidence and gap map is to map the available evidence on the effectiveness of social prescribing interventions addressing a non-medical, health-related social need for older adults in any setting.

Specific objectives are as follows:

  • 1.

    To identify existing evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews on the effects of community-based interventions that address non-medical, health-related social needs of older adults to improve their health and wellbeing.

  • 2.

    To identify research evidence gaps for new high-quality primary studies and systematic reviews.

  • 3.

    To highlight evidence of health equity considerations from included primary studies and systematic reviews.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
方案:社会处方对老年人的影响:证据和差距图
目标 这是证据和差距图的规程。目标如下:本证据与差距图旨在绘制有关社会处方干预有效性的现有证据,以满足老年人在任何环境下与健康无关的社会需求。 具体目标如下 1. 从初步研究和系统性综述中找出现有证据,说明以社区为基础的干预措施在满足老年人非医疗、与健康相关的社会需求以改善其健康和福祉方面的效果。 2. 确定新的高质量初步研究和系统性综述的研究证据差距。 3. 从已纳入的初步研究和系统性综述中突出健康公平考虑因素的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Campbell Systematic Reviews Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Critical appraisal of methodological quality and completeness of reporting in Chinese social science systematic reviews with meta-analysis: A systematic review The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for reducing problematic substance use, mental ill health, and housing instability in people experiencing homelessness in high income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis Exposure to hate in online and traditional media: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of this exposure on individuals and communities PROTOCOL: Non-criminal justice interventions for countering cognitive and behavioural radicalisation amongst children and adolescents: A systematic review of effectiveness and implementation Protocol: The impact of integrated thematic instruction model on primary and secondary school students compared to standard teaching: A protocol of systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1