An Optimized and Validated QuEChERS-Based Method for the Determination of PCBs in Edible Aquatic Species

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Analytical Methods Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1007/s12161-024-02601-0
Epameinondas P. Trantopoulos, Vasiliki I. Boti, Triantafyllos A. Albanis
{"title":"An Optimized and Validated QuEChERS-Based Method for the Determination of PCBs in Edible Aquatic Species","authors":"Epameinondas P. Trantopoulos,&nbsp;Vasiliki I. Boti,&nbsp;Triantafyllos A. Albanis","doi":"10.1007/s12161-024-02601-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the present research, a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) method was optimized and validated for the determination of 14 selected PCB congeners in mussel (<i>Mytilus galloprovincialis</i>) and fish samples (<i>Sparus aurata</i>). The optimization included the selection of different QuEChERS procedures, extraction solvent, sample weight, and suitable sorbents for the clean-up step to achieve high sensitivity and minimal matrix interferences simultaneously. The identification and quantification of the selected PCBs were carried out using GC–MS. The method was validated providing in all cases excellent linearity (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> above 0.99). Recoveries were estimated at three different fortification levels (10, 50, and 100 ng g<sup>−1</sup>) and ranged from 72.5 to 109.5% and 72.1 to 88.4% for mussel and fish samples, respectively. In addition, for both matrices, the LOQs ranged from 1 to 2.5 ng g<sup>−1</sup>. The matrix effect was in all cases &lt; 29%, while the expanded uncertainty <i>U</i>%, which was estimated at all the fortification levels, was found below 53% in all cases. Eventually, the optimized and validated method was applied to mussel and fish samples acquired from aquacultures in NW Greece, revealing the absence of the selected congeners in all cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":561,"journal":{"name":"Food Analytical Methods","volume":"17 5","pages":"679 - 688"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12161-024-02601-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-024-02601-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present research, a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) method was optimized and validated for the determination of 14 selected PCB congeners in mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and fish samples (Sparus aurata). The optimization included the selection of different QuEChERS procedures, extraction solvent, sample weight, and suitable sorbents for the clean-up step to achieve high sensitivity and minimal matrix interferences simultaneously. The identification and quantification of the selected PCBs were carried out using GC–MS. The method was validated providing in all cases excellent linearity (r2 above 0.99). Recoveries were estimated at three different fortification levels (10, 50, and 100 ng g−1) and ranged from 72.5 to 109.5% and 72.1 to 88.4% for mussel and fish samples, respectively. In addition, for both matrices, the LOQs ranged from 1 to 2.5 ng g−1. The matrix effect was in all cases < 29%, while the expanded uncertainty U%, which was estimated at all the fortification levels, was found below 53% in all cases. Eventually, the optimized and validated method was applied to mussel and fish samples acquired from aquacultures in NW Greece, revealing the absence of the selected congeners in all cases.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于 QuEChERS 的检测食用水生物种中多氯联苯的优化验证方法
本研究优化并验证了一种快速、简便、廉价、有效、耐用且安全的(QuEChERS)方法,用于测定贻贝(Mytilus galloprovincialis)和鱼类样品(Sparus aurata)中 14 种选定的多氯联苯同系物。优化工作包括为净化步骤选择不同的 QuEChERS 程序、萃取溶剂、样品重量和合适的吸附剂,以同时实现高灵敏度和最小的基质干扰。所选多氯联苯的鉴定和定量采用气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)进行。经过验证,该方法在所有情况下都具有良好的线性关系(r2 超过 0.99)。在三个不同的强化水平(10、50 和 100 纳克 g-1)下,贻贝和鱼类样品的回收率分别为 72.5%至 109.5%和 72.1%至 88.4%。此外,这两种基质的最低检测限(LOQ)介于 1 至 2.5 纳克/克之间。基质效应在所有情况下均为 29%,而在所有强化水平下估计的扩展不确定度 U% 在所有情况下均低于 53%。最后,将经过优化和验证的方法应用于从希腊西北部水产养殖场采集的贻贝和鱼类样品,结果表明在所有情况下都不存在选定的同系物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Analytical Methods
Food Analytical Methods 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
244
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: Food Analytical Methods publishes original articles, review articles, and notes on novel and/or state-of-the-art analytical methods or issues to be solved, as well as significant improvements or interesting applications to existing methods. These include analytical technology and methodology for food microbial contaminants, food chemistry and toxicology, food quality, food authenticity and food traceability. The journal covers fundamental and specific aspects of the development, optimization, and practical implementation in routine laboratories, and validation of food analytical methods for the monitoring of food safety and quality.
期刊最新文献
A Straightforward Method for Disaccharide Characterization from Transverse Relaxometry Using Low-Field Time-Domain Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Phytochemical Factor Analysis of Some Extra Virgin Olive Oils (Olivae oleum) and the Effects of Storage Under Different Conditions—Simulating General Consumer Behavior Sensory Evaluation and Volatile Organic Compounds in Dried Mango Produced from Different Varieties Determination of Adulteration in Evening Primrose Oil Capsules by 1H NMR Analysis and Chemometric Techniques Advanced Quantification of Trans Fatty Acids in Biscuits Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy with Attenuated Total Reflectance (FT-IR-ATR)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1