Investigation of central auditory processing performance in individuals with and without stuttering

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Fluency Disorders Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jfludis.2024.106048
Tuğçe Koca , Erol Belgin , Gül Ölçek
{"title":"Investigation of central auditory processing performance in individuals with and without stuttering","authors":"Tuğçe Koca ,&nbsp;Erol Belgin ,&nbsp;Gül Ölçek","doi":"10.1016/j.jfludis.2024.106048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Differences in core auditory processing abilities, such as sound timing, frequency discrimination, auditory perception, and auditory memory, have been suggested in stutterers, despite the fact that the precise origin of stuttering is not entirely understood. It is suggested that these differences may play a role in the development of stuttering. The aim of our study is to assess the temporal central auditory processing performance in individuals with stuttering and compare it to individuals without stuttering to uncover potential differences stuttering and compare it to individuals without stuttering to reveal potential differences.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>In current study, a total of 60 right-handed participants between the ages of 8 and 17 were included, divided into two balanced groups based on age, education, and gender: individuals with stuttering (n = 30) and individuals without stuttering (n = 30). All participants underwent the Frequency Pattern Test, Duration Pattern Test, and Gaps-In-Noise test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Individuals who stutter showed lower performance in the gap detection threshold and the percentage of total correct gap identification parameters of the Frequency Pattern Test, Duration Pattern Test, and Gaps-In-Noise test compared to fluent speakers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings indicate a potential relationship between stuttering and central auditory processing. In this context, incorporating central auditory processing measures into the assessment and therapy processes for stuttering may enhance the likelihood of obtaining more accurate results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluency Disorders","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 106048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluency Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094730X24000123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Differences in core auditory processing abilities, such as sound timing, frequency discrimination, auditory perception, and auditory memory, have been suggested in stutterers, despite the fact that the precise origin of stuttering is not entirely understood. It is suggested that these differences may play a role in the development of stuttering. The aim of our study is to assess the temporal central auditory processing performance in individuals with stuttering and compare it to individuals without stuttering to uncover potential differences stuttering and compare it to individuals without stuttering to reveal potential differences.

Method

In current study, a total of 60 right-handed participants between the ages of 8 and 17 were included, divided into two balanced groups based on age, education, and gender: individuals with stuttering (n = 30) and individuals without stuttering (n = 30). All participants underwent the Frequency Pattern Test, Duration Pattern Test, and Gaps-In-Noise test.

Results

Individuals who stutter showed lower performance in the gap detection threshold and the percentage of total correct gap identification parameters of the Frequency Pattern Test, Duration Pattern Test, and Gaps-In-Noise test compared to fluent speakers.

Conclusions

The findings indicate a potential relationship between stuttering and central auditory processing. In this context, incorporating central auditory processing measures into the assessment and therapy processes for stuttering may enhance the likelihood of obtaining more accurate results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查口吃患者和非口吃患者的中央听觉处理能力
尽管口吃的确切起源尚不完全清楚,但有人认为口吃患者在声音计时、频率辨别、听觉感知和听觉记忆等核心听觉处理能力方面存在差异。有人认为,这些差异可能在口吃的发展过程中起了作用。我们的研究旨在评估口吃患者的颞叶中枢听觉处理能力,并将其与非口吃患者进行比较,以发现口吃患者与非口吃患者的潜在差异。本研究共纳入了60名年龄在8至17岁之间的右撇子参与者,根据年龄、教育程度和性别分为两个平衡组:口吃患者(n = 30)和非口吃患者(n = 30)。所有参与者都接受了频率模式测试、持续时间模式测试和噪声间隙测试。与讲流利话的人相比,口吃患者在频率模式测试、持续时间模式测试和噪声中间隙测试的间隙检测阈值和间隙识别总正确率参数方面表现较差。研究结果表明,口吃与中枢听觉处理之间存在潜在关系。在这种情况下,将中枢听觉处理措施纳入口吃的评估和治疗过程中,可能会提高获得更准确结果的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Journal of Fluency Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Fluency Disorders provides comprehensive coverage of clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects of stuttering, including the latest remediation techniques. As the official journal of the International Fluency Association, the journal features full-length research and clinical reports; methodological, theoretical and philosophical articles; reviews; short communications and much more – all readily accessible and tailored to the needs of the professional.
期刊最新文献
Reimagining stuttering therapy and outcomes through an acceptance and collaborative lens Stuttering as an act of love The application of non-invasive neuromodulation in stuttering: Current status and future directions Administering the Lidcombe Program to children who stutter with concomitant disorders: Insights from an exploratory retrospective chart review study A pilot study of stuttering treatment for older children (STOC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1